Luteal Phase Support clinical trials

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

View clinical trials related to Luteal Phase Support.

Filter by:

Completed
Page 1

NCT ID: NCT03734770 Completed - Clinical trials for In Vitro Fertilization

Patient's Preferences About Subcutaneous or Vaginal Progesterone Administration for Luteal Phase Support

PROPER-1

Start date: January 1, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Luteal phase support in "in vitro fertilization" (IVF) cycles has been shown to improve pregnancy rates and became a standard of treatment, and progesterone is the first choice considering its safety profile and effectiveness. There are many studies demonstrating that vaginal progesterone is equally efficacious and better tolerated compared to intramuscular progesterone for luteal phase support in IVF cycles. Conversely, although different studies showed that subcutaneous progesterone is equally efficacious compared to vaginal progesterone, patient use satisfaction and compliance were less studied with few evidences are available, that may guide the choice of vaginal progesterone instead of subcutaneous progesterone and other way around. Considering the paucity of published data about the patient's preference and use satisfaction about subcutaneous progesterone, the investigators will conduct a prospective randomized study aimed to compared adverse effects rates, impact on quality of life, use satisfaction and administration preference in women undergoing luteal phase support with vaginal progesterone versus subcutaneous progesterone during IVF cycles, that may guide the choice for luteal phase support in IVF cycles.