Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this interventional crossover study, in intubated and mechanically ventilated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) patients, is to compare two positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration techniques regarding: respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, changes in aeration, ventilation/perfusion matching its impact on cardiac function, especially the right heart (RH). The PEEP titration techniques are: PEEP selection based on low PEEP/high FiO2 table ("PEEPARDSnet") and lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) plus PEEPdec titration based on the best compliance of the respiratory system("PEEPLRM").


Clinical Trial Description

A recent large observational study published on JAMA showed that Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is associated with high mortality and developed in 10.4% of 29,144 patients admitted to the intensive care unit from 50 countries across 5 continents. Mechanical ventilation is the cornerstone for lung treatment during ARDS. Lung protective ventilation improved ARDS outcome significantly. However, it is still unclear what method should be used to select levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). In the current study proposal, the investigators hypothesized that, when ARDS lungs are recruitable, a lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) and PEEP titration ("PEEPLRM") improve ventilation/perfusion matching and decreased right heart workload when compared to the actual standard of care PEEP selection based on low PEEP/high FiO2 table ("PEEPARDSnet"). The investigators will test this hypothesis in an interventional crossover study. 50 patients with ARDS will be enrolled in a physiological and lung and heart imaging study. The protocol is divided in the following phases: A) "PEEPARDSnet": setting PEEP according to the ARDSnet table (low PEEP/ high FiO2) B) Recruitability assessment sequence: P-V curve tool (Hamilton ventilator): evaluate patient recruitability, among three criteria, two must be positive to consider a subject recruitable: (1) Presence of a lower inflection point (2) Linear compliance measured more than 2 times higher than the dynamic compliance (3) Increase in volume of more than 300mL during the descendant limb of the PV curve at a same given pressure (20 cmH2O)(Hysteresis property). C)"PEEPLRM": LRM plus PEEP decremental trial guided by best compliance. Lung and heart response to "PEEPLRM": we will compare the driving pressure (DP) value (DP = Plateau pressure - PEEP) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with the values at PEEPARDSnet. In the advent of an increased DP and/or new onset of abnormal values at the TTE, we will resume the PEEPARDSnet settings during the 48h follow-up phase. Before and after the lung recruitment maneuver and decremental PEEP trial, we will collect: 1. Respiratory system mechanics 2. Lung volumes 3. Gas exchange 4. Hemodynamic parameters 5. Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) ventilation and perfusion data 6. Transthoracic echocardiographic indices of RH function Follow-up phase: In 24 and 48 hours, if the subject did not present a negative response to "PEEPLRM" as described above , we will repeat the recruitment maneuver and the decremental PEEP trial and and we will collect: 1. Respiratory system mechanics (i.e. driving pressure) 2. Lung volumes 3. Gas exchange 4. Hemodynamic parameters 5. EIT ventilation and perfusion data 6. Transthoracic echocardiographic indices of RH function before and after the aforementioned intervention. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03202641
Study type Interventional
Source Massachusetts General Hospital
Contact Lorenzo Berra, MD
Phone 6176437733
Email lberra@partners.org
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date June 19, 2019
Completion date August 2024

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05030337 - Optimising Ventilation in Preterms With Closed-loop Oxygen Control N/A
Completed NCT05144607 - Impact of Inspiratory Muscle Pressure Curves on the Ability of Professionals to Identify Patient-ventilator Asynchronies N/A
Recruiting NCT03697785 - Weaning Algorithm for Mechanical VEntilation N/A
Completed NCT05084976 - Parental Perception of COVID-19 Vaccine in Technology Dependent Patients
Active, not recruiting NCT05886387 - a Bayesian Analysis of Three Randomised Clinical Trials of Intraoperative Ventilation
Completed NCT04429399 - Lowering PEEP: Weaning From High PEEP Setting N/A
Completed NCT02249039 - Intravenous Clonidine for Sedation in Infants and Children Who Are Mechanically Ventilated - Dosing Finding Study Phase 1
Recruiting NCT02071524 - Evaluation of the Effects of Fluid Therapy on Respiratory Mechanics N/A
Completed NCT01114022 - Prevention Inhalation of Bacterial by Using Endotracheal Tube Balloon Polyvinyl Chloride or Polyurethane N/A
Completed NCT00893763 - Strategies To Prevent Pneumonia 2 (SToPP2) Phase 2
Terminated NCT05056103 - Automated Secretion Removal in ICU Patients N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04558476 - Efficacy of CONvalescent Plasma in Patients With COVID-19 Treated With Mechanical Ventilation Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05295186 - PAV Trial During SBT Trial
Active, not recruiting NCT05370248 - The Effect of 6 ml/kg vs 10 ml/kg Tidal Volume on Diaphragm Dysfunction in Critically Mechanically Ventilated Patient N/A
Completed NCT04818164 - Prone Position Improves End-Expiratory Lung Volumes in COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Completed NCT04589910 - Measuring Thickness of the Normal Diaphragm in Children Via Ultrasound. N/A
Completed NCT04193254 - LPP , MP and DP:Relation With Mortality and SOFA in Mechanically Ventilated Patients in ER, Ward and ICU
Not yet recruiting NCT03259854 - Non Invasive Mechanical Ventilation VERSUS Oxygen MASK N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03245684 - Assisted or Controlled Ventilation in Ards (Ascovent) N/A
Completed NCT06332768 - NIV Versus HFO Versus Standard Therapy Immediately After Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation in ARDS Patients N/A