Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Background: Different methods for lumbar pedicular screw insertion have been advocated, however each technique has its cons and pros. Due to limited resources for O-Arm and navigation in our locality, the investigator was enforced to use the surgical skills to minimize the need for such advanced modalities.

Aim of the study: Is to clarify the benefits of the use of free hand technique using direct visualization of the pedicles and disc space as the only guide for pedicular screw insertion using postoperative CT for evaluation of the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion.

Patients and methods: One hundred and forty four screws were inserted in 32 patients using direct pedicle visualization and disc space orientation as a single intraoperative reference guide. The study was conducted in Zagazig University Hospitals from May, 2014 to June, 2015. CT was done for all patients as a direct postoperative evaluation tool.


Clinical Trial Description

Patients and methods: This study was conducted in Zagazig University Hospitals in the period from May 2014 to June 2015 after approval from the Zagazig University Institutional Review Board (Zu-IRB). All patients were subjected to complete history talking, clinical evaluation and adequate radiological and laboratory investigations.

The radiological studies included plain X-Ray lumbosacral spine, anteroposterior, lateral neutral, and lateral dynamic views (lateral with flexion and lateral with extension), MRI lumbosacral spine sagittal and axial views, and in some cases CT lumbosacral spine with sagittal reconstruction. All these modalities give us a good idea about both soft tissue and bony pathology in the area of interest. Selection of the patients for surgery was based on clinicoradiologic items.

All the cases of pedicular screw insertion were preceded by full laminectomy with discectomy for interbody fusion. In all cases the medial and inferior aspects of the pedicle are clearly visualized, so selection of the entry point and direct observation of medial and inferior pedicle violation are two main advantages of this technique. On the other hand after discectomy the disc space with the two parallel endplates are available for use as a guide for screw craniocaudal angulation.

After the removal of the whole lamina with its inferior articular processes and removal of fibrocartilagenous tissues overlying the exiting roots and removal of the intervertebral disc, the anatomy of the pedicle and its relation to the exiting roots is clearly evident.

Starting pedicular screw insertion, part of the cortical bone at the inferolateral edge of the superior facet is removed. This entry point lies exactly along the transverse plane passing through the middle of the corresponding transverse process.

At the same time the inferior and medial surfaces of the pedicle along with the exiting nerve root are clearly visualized, so all factors needed for correct pedicle screw insertion are available including the correct entry point, the mediolateral and craniocaudal orientation in addition to the visual protection provided from inside the canal to observe any medial or inferior pedicle violation.

The investigator used to insert a dissector inside the disc space as an additional guide to craniocaudal orientation of the screw which should be parallel to the disc space.

The process of pedicular screw insertion is completed as usual and the disc space is properly curetted using the suitable shavers then the prepared autologous bone graft is impacted in the disc space. The remaining screws are inserted and the rods are installed and secured as usual.

The time needed for each screw insertion was calculated. During the previous steps neither fluoroscopic guidance nor neuronavigation were used.

After completion of the previous steps, a single lateral and anteroposterior film was used to confirm the correct screw position.

The surgery is completed as usual and the patient is discharged for follow up after two weeks, during which a complementary CT scan lumbar spine is routinely performed and analyzed for the accuracy of the screw position.

Pedicle violation was assessed whether medial, inferior, lateral or superior. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03327298
Study type Interventional
Source Zagazig University
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date May 10, 2014
Completion date June 5, 2015

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05527145 - Spinal Stenosis and Listhesis Treated With Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer: a Non-surgical Trial N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05480267 - A RCT of UBE vs. MIS-TLIF in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03271060 - Comparative Study Between Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion(PLIF) and Intertransverse Process Fusion in Treatment of Spodylolithesis N/A
Terminated NCT03570801 - SLIP II Registry: Spinal Laminectomy Versus Instrumented Pedicle Screw Fusion N/A
Recruiting NCT05023733 - Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of TLIF w/3D Printed Cellular Implant
Recruiting NCT02972190 - Clinical Study of Bilateral Decompression With Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis N/A
Completed NCT04520334 - A Zhineng Qigong Intervention for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain and/or Leg Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT05405374 - OSTEOAMP Lumbar Fusion Intra-Patient Controlled Study N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05464134 - Incidence of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis in Patients Candidate for TKR
Recruiting NCT06154005 - OsteoAdapt SP Advanced Bone Graft Feasibility Study - Transforaminal Interbody Lumbar Fusion Phase 1/Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT06255366 - Analysis of the Clinical Efficacy of Intravenous Application of Hemostatic Drugs in Improving the Clarity of Vision Under Endoscope, Perioperative Bleeding Volume and Anti-inflammatory Effect of Spinal Endoscopic Lumbar Fusion Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT03733626 - Clinical Outcomes Associated With the Use of ViviGen® for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05993195 - Re-operation Rates of Concorde Bullet Device Versus Conduit Titanium Interbody Graft for Lumbar Fusion
Active, not recruiting NCT03879447 - Effectiveness and Safety of Korean Medicine for Low Back Pain or Sciatica Due to Lumbar Stenosis/Spondylolisthesis
Not yet recruiting NCT05691062 - Titanium vs. PEEK Fusion Devices in 1 Level TLIF Phase 4
Completed NCT05345249 - Erector Spinae Plane Block as Pain Management After Lumbar Fusion Surgery Phase 4
Completed NCT05959343 - Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion N/A
Recruiting NCT03745040 - Liposomal Bupivacaine in One-level Instrumented Posterior Spinal Fusion Phase 4
Recruiting NCT03969602 - Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) After Lumbar Spinal Fusion in Patients With High Pain Catastrophizing N/A
Completed NCT04886557 - Retrospective Image Analysis of Degenerative Lumbar Disease Patients