Lumbar Spine Degeneration Clinical Trial
— MASTERS-DOfficial title:
A Prospective, Multicenter Observational Study on MAST™ (Minimal Access Spinal Technologies) Fusion Procedures for the Treatment of the Degenerative Lumbar Spine (MASTERS-D)
NCT number | NCT01143324 |
Other study ID # | MASTERS-D Study |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | June 2010 |
Est. completion date | August 2013 |
Verified date | January 2016 |
Source | Medtronic Spinal and Biologics |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational |
The aim of the study is to observe and document surgical practice and evaluate patients' outcomes following a MAST™ single or double level instrumented fusion procedure using PLIF (Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion) or TLIF (Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion) techniques for the treatment of the degenerative lumbar spine in a "real-world" patient population.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 255 |
Est. completion date | August 2013 |
Est. primary completion date | May 2013 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Patient is >18 years of age (or minimum age as required by local regulations). - Patient has indication for a single or double level instrumented lumbar fusion for the treatment of the degenerative lumbar spine. - Patient agrees to participate in the study and is able to sign the Data Release Form/Informed Consent. - The procedure planned for the patient complies with the labeling of the Devices that may be used in the surgical procedure as described in the section B.2 Device Information. - Patient is planned to be submitted to the fusion procedure using PLIF or TLIF techniques and to receive a CD HORIZON® Spinal System via a MAST™ approach. - The patient is willing and is able to cooperate with study procedures and required follow-up visits. Exclusion Criteria: - Patient that has already undergone an open lumbar spine surgery other than microdiscectomy. - Indications for the procedure other than degenerative spine disease like Osteoporotic vertebral fractures, Spine trauma fractures and Spine tumor. In order to reduce as much as possible bias in this observational study, the study centers should propose the study to all consecutive individuals who meet these in and exclusion criteria to participate in the study in order to comply with the 'real world' population concept. This observational study does not require any specific test or procedure that falls outside a standard surgical procedure and patient follow-up as routinely done in the hospital. Some data was collected only for centers that applied such procedures as standard of care. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Austria | Klinikum Amstetten | Amstetten | |
Belgium | OLV Ziekenhuis | Aalst | |
Canada | Spine, Sports Medicine and Orthopedic Surgery | Saint John | New Brunswick |
Czechia | Karvinska Hornicka Nemocnice | Karvina | |
Germany | Marienhaus Klinikum | Bendorf | |
Germany | Neurochirurgische Universitatsklinik | Freiburg | |
Germany | Klinikum Kulmbach | Kulmbach | Bayern |
Germany | Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg | Magdeburg | |
Greece | Mediterraneo | Glyfada | |
Israel | The Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center | Tel Aviv | |
Italy | Instituto Ortopedici Rizzoli | Bologna | |
Italy | Fatebenefratelli Hospital | Milano | |
Netherlands | Bergman Clinics | Naarden | |
Netherlands | Franciscus Ziekenhuis Roosendaal | Roosendaal | |
Poland | University Clinical Center | Gdansk | |
Portugal | Hospital San Joao | Porto | |
Slovakia | Ustredna Vojenska Nemocnica SNP | Ruzomberok | |
Spain | Hospital Clinic De Barcelona | Barcelona | |
United Kingdom | Guys & St; Thomas NHS Trust | London |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Medtronic Spinal and Biologics |
Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, United Kingdom,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Time From Surgery to First Ambulation. | The primary objective of the study is to access the short term recovery (from surgery to hospital discharge) since the minimally invasive lumbar fusion techniques are expected to be associated with immediate short-term benefits. Patients undergoing minimally invasive procedures are reported to recover earlier from surgery particularly with a shorter time to first ambulation and shorter discharge as compared to the standard open procedures. Outcome measure timeframe for time from surgery to first ambulation is assessed up to hospital discharge as pts are all ambulated before discharge from the hospital. |
From date of Surgery to date of First ambulation, assessed up to hospital discharge. | |
Primary | Time to Surgery Recovery Day. | The primary objective of the study is to access the short term recovery (from surgery to discharge) since the minimally invasive lumbar fusion techniques are expected to be associated with immediate short-term benefits. Patients undergoing minimally invasive procedures are reported to recover earlier from surgery particularly with a shorter time to first ambulation and shorter discharge as compared to the standard open procedures. Surgery recovery day is defined as the day when patients fulfils following criteria : patient no longer needs intravenous infusion of analgesic drugs, there are no surgery related complications (AEs) impending discharge of patient, patient no longer needs nursing care. The objective of the surgery recovery day assessment is to collect the day when the patient could be discharged based on his actual clinical condition because the effective day of discharge may be prolonged by factors other than the patient's clinical recovery such as social factors. |
From date of surgery until date of surgery recovery day assessed up to hospital discharge. | |
Secondary | Back Pain Intensity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score as Compared to Baseline. | Relief of Back Pain intensity at 12 months compared to the baseline using the Back Pain Intensity Score assessed on a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The endpoint is the difference between baseline and 12 months of the patient's back-pain intensity score on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). A standardized visual analogue scale (0cm-10cm; with 0cm meaning 'no pain' and 10cm meaning 'worst possible pain') was used. Large values of the VAS score represent large degree of pain. Large (negative) change in VAS score (12 months - baseline) represents large relief of pain. |
Baseline, 12 months | |
Secondary | Leg Pain Intensity VAS Score as Compared to Baseline | Leg pain intensity (using VAS intensity score) as compared to baseline. Relief of Leg Pain intensity at 12 months compared to the baseline using the Back Pain Intensity Score assessed on a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The endpoint is the difference between baseline and 12 months of the patient's leg-pain intensity score on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). A standardized visual analogue scale (0cm-10cm; with 0cm meaning 'no pain' and 10cm meaning 'worst possible pain') was used. Large values of the VAS score represent large degree of pain. Large (negative) change in VAS score (12 months - baseline) represents large relief of pain. |
Baseline, 12 months | |
Secondary | EQ-5D Questionnaire (When it is a Routine Practice) as Compared to Baseline. | EQ-5D questionnaire as compared to baseline measurement. EQ-5D Index was calculated based on answers provided in the questionnaire. Applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments, the EQ-5D provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. The EQ-5D-3L consists of the EQ-5D-3L descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. The respondent is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking in the box against the most appropriate statement in each of the 5 dimensions. EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical 20 cm VAS where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' at the top and 'Worst imaginable health state' at the bottom, having numeric values of 100 and 0 respectively. | Baseline, 12 months | |
Secondary | Fusion Rate as Assessed by CT Scan or X-Rays, in Those Sites Where This Assessment is Standard of Care. | Fusion rate as assessed by the CT Scan or X-Rays, in those sites where this assessment is standard of care. | 12 months | |
Secondary | Number of Patients Who Utilized Rehabilitation Programs | The number of patients who utilized rehabilitation programs was documented (when required). | From 6-12 months after the day of surgery | |
Secondary | Proportion of Patients Needing a Second Intervention at the Treated Level(s) (Reoperation Rates). | Proportion of the patients needing a second intervention at the treated level(s) (reoperation rates). | From baseline until 12 months | |
Secondary | Proportion of Patients Needing Intervention at Adjacent Level(s). | Proportion of the patients needing intervention at adjacent level(s). | From Baseline until 12 months | |
Secondary | Document Change in Pain Medication Consumption Over Time as Compared With Baseline. Baseline. | Document the change in pain medication consumption one year after surgery , as compared with baseline. The endpoint is the number of participants taking pain medication at baseline and number of participants taking pain medication in the week before the 12 months follow up visit. | Baseline, 12 months | |
Secondary | Document Adverse Events Occurrence Throughout the Study. | Document the Adverse Events occurrence throughout the study. All adverse events have been included regardless visit windowing. | From Baseline until 12 months | |
Secondary | ODI Difference 12 Months After the Surgery as Compared to Baseline. | Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) 12 months after the surgery as compared to baseline. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) derives from the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire, it is used to measure disability for low back pain. The index is scored from 0 to 100; 0 meaning 'no disability' and 100 meaning 'maximum disability'. | Baseline, 12 months | |
Secondary | Number of Patients That Returned to Work 12months After the Surgery. | Document number of participants that returned to work 12 months after surgery. | 12 months after the surgery |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04140344 -
The NOTICE Study: Neurosurgery and OrThopedIcs Communication Evaluation Study Following Lumbar Fusions
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04914728 -
Mini-invasive Lumbar Arthrodesis in Ambulatory
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05527145 -
Spinal Stenosis and Listhesis Treated With Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer: a Non-surgical Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05630404 -
Efficacy of Surgical Injection Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05452694 -
OpalGenix- Personalized Postoperative Pain Management Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion and Decompression Surgery in Adults
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04823858 -
3Spine Lumbar Fusion Real World Evidence Study
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06154005 -
OsteoAdapt SP Advanced Bone Graft Feasibility Study - Transforaminal Interbody Lumbar Fusion
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04781517 -
Development of a Patient-reported Outcome Instrument for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease After Lumbar Fusion
|
||
Completed |
NCT03977961 -
The Six-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) as a Measure of Functional Impairment in Lumbar Degenerate Disc Disease.
|
||
Completed |
NCT03176303 -
Study Using the SpinalStim Device Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06462729 -
LDGraft in Single Level Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF)
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05438719 -
MOTUS Total Joint Replacement Investigational Device Exemption Study
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05388383 -
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Robot-assisted Spinal Surgery
|
||
Completed |
NCT06316921 -
Epidural PCA on Pain Relief After L-spine Surgery
|
||
Completed |
NCT03452449 -
Physical Activity, Disability and Quality of Life Before and After Lumbar Spine Surgery
|
||
Terminated |
NCT03527966 -
rhBMP-2 Versus Vivigen in Lumbar Fusion Procedures
|
Phase 4 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05408923 -
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Irrisept Versus Normal Saline for Wound Irrigation After Posterior Spine Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT01415908 -
INFUSE®Bone Graft in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Disease of Lumbosacral Spine
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04062942 -
The Six-Minute Walking Test (6WT) and Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) Test as Measures of Objective Functional Impairment in Patients Undergoing Interlaminar or Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD)
|
||
Completed |
NCT03088306 -
Improving Pain and Reducing Opioid Use (IPaRO) in Lumbar Spine Surgery Patients
|
Early Phase 1 |