Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01628874
Other study ID # 12-0542
Secondary ID
Status Terminated
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date September 2012
Est. completion date August 2016

Study information

Verified date June 2019
Source University of Colorado, Denver
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a needle-free jet-injection system with 1% buffered lidocaine for local anesthesia for lumbar punctures compared to a topical anesthetic agent. Our hypothesis is: A needle-free jet-injection system (J-Tip) with 1% lidocaine will provide local anesthesia that is comparable to that of a topical anesthetic agent (EMLA cream) when performing lumbar punctures in children.


Description:

Lumbar punctures are a common procedure performed in children in the emergency department. In febrile infants they are frequently performed as part of a sepsis evaluation, and in older children they are used in the evaluation of possible meningitis, new seizures, altered mental status and other neurologic emergencies.

Several studies in the pediatric emergency medicine literature have found a positive association between lumbar puncture success and the use of local anesthesia in infant lumbar punctures. Despite this data, studies have shown that 70-76% of lumbar punctures in the emergency department are performed without any form of pain management, with up to 95% of infants receiving no form of pain management. Common reasoning for providers to forgo pain management include the time for topical anesthetics to be effective (30-45 minutes), the pain already associated with injectable lidocaine, and obscuring of anatomic landmarks with injectable lidocaine.

A recent development in pain management for pediatric procedures is the use of needle-free jet injection of lidocaine. One such device is the J-Tip, which uses a compressed carbon dioxide (CO2) cartridge to deliver medication to the subcutaneous tissues to a depth of 5-8 mm in 0.2 seconds. It has been shown to be largely pain-free for children. Multiple studies have shown it to be effective in reducing pain associated with peripheral IV placement in children. The J-Tip has recently been approved for peripheral IV starts in the Children's Hospital Colorado emergency department.

Some hospitals anecdotally report using the device for lumbar punctures, but to date no randomized studies have evaluated its effectiveness in pain management compared to other methods. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the J-Tip in lumbar punctures. It offers the advantage of providing much faster anesthesia compared to topical creams, yet does not require the initial skin puncture of injectable lidocaine. If a rapid form of local anesthesia is available, it may increase the overall use of local anesthesia and improve pain management in the pediatric population.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Terminated
Enrollment 66
Est. completion date August 2016
Est. primary completion date August 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group N/A to 18 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- age =4 months or 4-18 years

- ability to report VAS for patients 4-18 years

- require lumbar puncture as part of their clinical care

Exclusion Criteria:

- ages 5-47 months

- developmental delay or inability to complete VAS in older patients

- allergy to lidocaine

- requirement of sedation for procedure

- pre-procedural analgesia treatment except for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
J-Tip
Used once for both arms prior to lumbar puncture. The Experimental arm will receive 0.5 mL (5mg) of 1% Lidocaine. The Active Comparator arm will receive normal saline. This will occur after the cream has been placed for 30 minutes and wiped away and prior to the lumbar puncture.
Drug:
EMLA
In the Active Comparator arm, lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% cream placed over area where lumbar puncture will occur for at least 30 minutes. This same procedure will occur for the Experimental arm with a placebo cream instead. This will occur once prior to the J-Tip injection and lumbar puncture.
Lidocaine
5 mg given via J-Tip once, repeat dosing as needed in the Experimental group. A placebo will be given in the Active Comparator group.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Children's Hospital Colorado Aurora Colorado

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Colorado, Denver Colorado Clinical & Translational Sciences Institute

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (12)

Baxter AL, Fisher RG, Burke BL, Goldblatt SS, Isaacman DJ, Lawson ML. Local anesthetic and stylet styles: factors associated with resident lumbar puncture success. Pediatrics. 2006 Mar;117(3):876-81. Erratum in: Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):1870. — View Citation

Baxter AL, Welch JC, Burke BL, Isaacman DJ. Pain, position, and stylet styles: infant lumbar puncture practices of pediatric emergency attending physicians. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 Dec;20(12):816-20. — View Citation

Fein D, Avner JR, Khine H. Pattern of pain management during lumbar puncture in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 May;26(5):357-60. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181db2026. — View Citation

Grunau RV, Craig KD. Pain expression in neonates: facial action and cry. Pain. 1987 Mar;28(3):395-410. — View Citation

Jimenez N, Bradford H, Seidel KD, Sousa M, Lynn AM. A comparison of a needle-free injection system for local anesthesia versus EMLA for intravenous catheter insertion in the pediatric patient. Anesth Analg. 2006 Feb;102(2):411-4. — View Citation

Kaur G, Gupta P, Kumar A. A randomized trial of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics during lumbar puncture in newborns. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Nov;157(11):1065-70. — View Citation

Nigrovic LE, Kuppermann N, Neuman MI. Risk factors for traumatic or unsuccessful lumbar punctures in children. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;49(6):762-71. Epub 2007 Feb 23. — View Citation

Powell CV, Kelly AM, Williams A. Determining the minimum clinically significant difference in visual analog pain score for children. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Jan;37(1):28-31. — View Citation

Quinn M, Carraccio C, Sacchetti A. Pain, punctures, and pediatricians. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1993 Feb;9(1):12-4. — View Citation

Rushforth JA, Levene MI. Behavioural response to pain in healthy neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1994 May;70(3):F174-6. — View Citation

Spanos S, Booth R, Koenig H, Sikes K, Gracely E, Kim IK. Jet Injection of 1% buffered lidocaine versus topical ELA-Max for anesthesia before peripheral intravenous catheterization in children: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Aug;24(8):511-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31816a8d5b. — View Citation

Tomlinson D, von Baeyer CL, Stinson JN, Sung L. A systematic review of faces scales for the self-report of pain intensity in children. Pediatrics. 2010 Nov;126(5):e1168-98. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1609. Epub 2010 Oct 4. Review. — View Citation

* Note: There are 12 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Pain Score The pain score was assessed using the 5-point Neonatal Coding System (NFCS) on a scale of 0-5, with 0 indicating no pain and 5 the highest level of pain. Immediately Post-Procedure
Primary Pain Score The pain score was assessed using the 5-point Neonatal Coding System (NFCS) on a scale of 0-5, with 0 indicating no pain and 5 the highest level of pain. At Needle Insertion
Primary Pain Score The pain score was assessed using the 5-point Neonatal Coding System (NFCS) on a scale of 0-5, with 0 indicating no pain and 5 the highest level of pain. At time J-TIP is used
Secondary Number of Participants With Lumbar Puncture Success The success of lumbar puncture was defined as obtaining Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) on the first attempt and <1000 Red Blood Cells/millimeter cubed Immediately following lumbar puncture
Secondary Change in Heart Rate Heart rate was measured at 5 points in time (pre-procedure, application of J-Tip, at LP needle insertion, while the needle is in place, and post-procedure) and was compared for significant differences At 5 specific points during the procedure
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT02918149 - Ultrasound Assisted Lumbar Puncture in the Neonate N/A
Completed NCT04070144 - The First Puncture Success Rate of a Novel Injeq IQ-Tip™ System in Pediatric Lumbar Punctures N/A
Completed NCT01606150 - Lumbar Punctures in Neonates: Improving Success Rates and Minimizing Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT05824546 - uSINE-PAMS Artificial Intelligence Driven, Ultrasound-Guided Lumbar Puncture to Improve Procedural Accuracy N/A
Recruiting NCT02243826 - Impact of 50% Nitrous Oxide Inhalation on Pain and Anxiety Induced by Lumbar Puncture: a Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial Phase 4
Terminated NCT03815045 - Ultrasound Guided Diagnostic Lumbar Puncture in Neurology N/A
Recruiting NCT01285531 - Pediatric Lumbar Puncture Success Using the COMPASS N/A
Recruiting NCT05269238 - Improvement of the Performance of Lumbar Punctures After Training Students With an Augmented Reality SIMulator N/A
Recruiting NCT03192423 - Acute Mental Stress During Lumbar Puncture N/A