View clinical trials related to Low Flow Anesthesia.
Filter by:Low flow anesthesia; It is an anesthesia practice in which, after absorbing at least 50% of the exhaled air and carbon dioxide (CO2) using a semi-closed rebreathing system, the unused anesthetic gases are mixed with a certain amount of fresh gas and then completely or partially returned to the patient in the next inspiration. Theoretically, when low flow anesthesia is compared to high or normal flow anesthesia; it is known to have advantages such as using less inhalation agent, preserving mucociliary activity, preventing microatelectasis, preserving the amount of moisture, and reducing temperature loss. In studies conducted in different fresh gas flows, it has been observed that CO, which is thought to accumulate in the body by rebreathing in a closed circuit, increases as a result of the chemical interaction and dry CO2 absorbent. However, there is no evidence in these studies that low-flow anesthesia increases CO accumulation and alters hemodynamics. In our clinic, low-flow and high-flow anesthesia technics are both being used. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of high- and low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia applied with a closed system on perioperative carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) levels and hemodynamic system in pediatric cardiovascular surgery cases.
Postoperative recovery quality is as important as patient satisfaction and clinical results in terms of a fast and high-quality surgical process. This study was conducted to investigate the effect of low-flow anesthesia applications on the quality of patient recovery by evaluating the 'Quality of Recovery' (QoR40) test and the perception tests (PQRS Cognitive test) performed in the early postoperative period.
Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has gained increasing popularity compared to open radical prostatectomy with its advantages such as low blood loss, reduced blood transfusion rate, low complication rate, and shortened hospital stay. Since robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy should be performed in the limited retroperitoneal area, insufflation of the abdomen with carbon dioxide (CO2) (pneumoperitoneum) and steep Trendelenburg position are required to provide better surgical vision. Low-flow anesthesia warms and moistens the inhaled gases, creating a more physiological breathing atmosphere during anesthesia. In addition, it provides cost advantage by reducing inhalation agent consumption and reduces atmospheric pollution. Studies show that long-term minimal flow anesthesia is safe and advantageous for non-laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study is to compare low-flow (1L/min) with normal flow (3lt/min) desflurane anesthesia in terms of hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, inhalation agent consumption and soda lime consumption for robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy surgery. The secondary aim of the study is to compare the effects of low-flow and normal-flow anesthesia in the steep trendelenburg position (45°) used for robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
In the present work the investigators will study the accuracy of the MAAS (Minimal-flow Autocontrol Anesthesia System) method to estimate the percentage of halogenated anesthetic (HA) to be supplied to the anesthetic circuit based on the estimation of HA uptake during the maintenance phase. The investigators will evaluate the accuracy of sevoflurane and desflurane vaporizers to guarantee the administration of that amount of estimated HA, thus guaranteeing the maintenance of the target concentration of HA at the end of expiration: end-tidal target HA% (ettHA%). To do this, the investigators will quantify the number of adjustments that need to be made to each vaporizer to maintain ettHA%. As secondary objectives, the investigators will analyze the time to reach the target concentration of HA, the deviations that occur from that concentration despite the correct application of the method, and the consumption of HA during the procedure. Through the entire procedure, all participants will be ventilated under a tailored open lung approach (tOLA) strategy.
The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of conventional low flow anesthesia (LFA) with initial high fresh gas flow ( 4L/min) for 10 minutes and LFA with fixed fresh gas flow rate (1L/min).