View clinical trials related to Low Back Pain.
Filter by:The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the safety and effect of bone marrow-derived stem cells for the treatment of low back pain.
Despite advances in intervention, many patients presenting with nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) fail to have recovery from symptoms and activity limitation. Evidence suggests that interventions commonly used by physical therapists, may be effective for some but not all subsets of people with low back pain. Posterior anterior vertebral mobilizations (PAVMs) followed by prone press up (PPU) exercise are commonly used in clinical practice without a firm evidence. Research has shown this intervention decreases nonspecific low back pain on immediate effects but there is still limitation.The objective of this study is to determine the effects of posterior anterior vertebral mobilization followed by prone press-up exercise in comparison to conventional physiotherapy in nonspecific low back pain. The hypothesis is that the PAVMs followed by PPU exercise is more effective as compared to conventional physiotherapy to improve pain, lumbar range of motion, disability and quality of life in NSLBP. So, a randomized controlled trial will be conducted at Sindh Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. One hindered and twenty patients with 18-40 years old having NSLB will be included on the basis of non-probability and purposive sampling technique and consent will be taken. Participants will be allocated into two groups through computer random sampling software. Experimental group will receive posterior-anterior vertebral mobilization followed by prone press up exercise and control group will receive conventional therapy (thermotherapy with general stretching exercises). All participants will be assessed using assessment form. After taking demo-graphical information, pain (in standing, sitting and walking), lumbar flexion and extension, functional disability and quality of life will be assessed before and after the treatment. All the data will be analysed for descriptive and inferential analysis.
The transverse abdominis (TrA) is the deepest muscle layer of lateral and anterior abdominal wall and also known as a significant component of core stability. Abdominal draw-in maneuver (ADIM) is the main for the strengthening of the deep muscle, however, sufficient activation of TrA by ADIM is limited. Blood flow restriction (BFR) training is a technique combined with low intensity exercise that produces similar results to high intensity training. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore whether BFR-assisted ADIM can become a new auxiliary way to train TrA, and whether it can better activate their TrA in patients with low back pain. Low back pain (LBP) is a major health problem with huge economic and social costs. Core muscle weakness is a risk factor for LBP. Past studies have also pointed out that the biggest cause affecting the quality of life and activities of modern people is lower back pain. In modern life, low back pain can be said to be a very common disease. According to past research, there is a 50% to 70% chance that people may have lower back pain in their lifetime, and non-specific low back pain accounts for the majority (90%), the reason why the influence of non-specific low back pain is so great is not only physically but also psychologically. When people perform many functions of daily life, people need the help of the waist. But once the wrong way of effort or posture will lead to more pressure on the spine, leading to greater pain, a strong sense of discomfort will haunt them for a long time. Therefore, the activation and control of TrA is very important because of the relationship between the lateral direction of TrA, so when TrA contracts, it will result in a decrease in waist circumference, an increase in thoracolumbar fascia tension and an increase in intra-abdominal pressure, so it is regarded as the most important stable muscle in the core.In addition, TrA is a special presence in the core muscle group, it can independently contract and like the presence of waist protection to stabilize our spine, but because it is located in the deepest layer, coupled with less muscle activity, it is difficult to effectively activate correctly, so if TrA is not activated or contracted correctly, it may cause non-specific lower back pain.
The purpose of this research study is to gain a better understanding of how people's racial background and socioeconomic status (e.g., income, education, and employment) impact their experiences of chronic low back pain (cLBP).
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effects of spinal manipulative therapy in individuals with chronic primary low back pain and determine the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying pain relief. The main questions it aims to answer are: • Is pain relief produced by spinal manipulative therapy in patients with chronic primary low back pain caused by a reduction of C-fiber-related nociceptive processing? • Are these effects greater when spinal manipulative therapy is applied to the whole spine where it is clinically indicated compared with lumbar spine only? • Are these effects greater after 36 treatments over 3 months compared with 12 treatments over 1 month. Participants will receive spinal manipulative therapy (all clinically indicated spine segments or back only) or a control intervention. A group of healthy volunteers will be recruited to assess secondary outcome measures over the same time period, as reference data for comparisons. Researchers will compare the two groups receiving spinal manipulative therapy to the group receiving the control intervention to see if clinical pain relief and the reduction of temporal summation of second pain (produced experimentally) is significantly greater with spinal manipulative therapy.
The purpose of the chronic pain master protocol is to compare independent pain interventions and establish an overarching structure for the disease-state addenda (DSA) and intervention-specific appendices (ISAs). The ISAs may start independently of other ISAs as interventions become available for clinical testing.
60-70% of pregnant women suffer from pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain. In the general population, patient education is the first line of treatment. For pregnant women with LBP, the guidelines are the same as for the general population. In fact, prenatal education programs specifically collect recommendations and educational strategies for managing this pain. Within educational strategies, education in the neuroscience of pain has gained special relevance in recent years due to its positive results in reducing pain in patients with low back pain. Despite the beneficial effects shown in patients with low back pain, its use has not yet been explored, to our knowledge, in women with pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain.
The goal of thisclinical trial is to observe and quantify the impact of our massage methods on the human body based on B-mode ultrasound, Vas score, and ODI score, and to compare our massage methods with traditional Chinese massage treatment. The main questions it aims to answer are: - To set up our standard operating procedure of massage therapy to adjust the stress line of psoas myofascial chain, and provide a more simple and effective therapy for Chronic low back pain. - try to establish a kind of ultrasonic standard to evaluate the curative effect of treating chronic low back pain. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups, the experimental group and the control group, the experimental group was given our characteristic massage treatment, the control group was given traditional Chinese massage treatment.Both groups were treated once every other day, 3 times a week, 2 weeks as a course of treatment, 2 courses of treatment.
The present feasibility study aims to evaluate the feasibility and adequacy of a multidisciplinary treatment program as a therapeutic option for patients with chronic low back pain referred to the pain unit of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona. Secondarily, the present study will also evaluate the effect on pain-related outcomes to estimate the number of needed participants for a full trial. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Is the proposed multidisciplinary treatment feasible and adequate for chronic low back pain patients? - Is the proposed multidisciplinary treatment effective in improving pain-related outcomes? Participants will receive either usual care (pharmacological control) or eight multidisciplinary sessions within two months, composed of therapeutic patient education, mindfulness relaxation, cognitive-behavioural therapy and therapeutic exercise. Besides, participants will be assessed using written questionnaires before and after treatment and two months after treatment. Researchers will assess the feasibility of the multidisciplinary treatment group and will compare both groups to see if there is any difference in several pain-related outcomes.
This is a prospective, sham-controlled, randomized, single-blinded, multi-center study comparing two different modes of the NexWave device, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and interferential current (IFC), with an identical non-functioning NexWave sham device or self-defined standard of care for improvement of pain intensity of non-specific CLBP.