View clinical trials related to Low Back Pain, Recurrent.
Filter by:to investigate the effects of placebo in patients affected by low-back pain.
Proposing ways to effectively counter chronic low back pain through non-drug intervention is a major public health issue due to the prevalence and health costs of this condition. The back school (BS) is based on spinal economics and a biomechanical model. A convergence of evidence indicates that this type of program does not bring any mid- or long-term benefit. Faced with this observation, a Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) has been developed based on a biopsychosocial model. Chronic low back pain is the consequence of a complex dynamic of multifactorial origin where the body lesion is no longer the only cause of the pain. Studies have shown that PNE has a positive effect on pain perception. One of the limitations of these studies is that they do not allow objective measurement of physical activity performed at a distance from a therapeutic program for patients who have benefited from these educational programs. Yet, physical activity is an essential variable in health and more specifically in the fight against pain in patients with chronic low back pain. The investigators believe that physical activity is a key factor in improving the condition of patients with chronic low back pain. Consequently, physical activity is an indicator of success but also a guarantee for a lasting effect of educational treatment. In order to measure this physical activity, the use of activity monitor (connected watch) developed in recent years now makes it possible to collect data in an ecological manner that is more objective than the data collected via self-questionnaires. The main objective of the study is to measure the effectiveness of a PNE on physical activity three months after the intervention compared to BS in patients with chronic low back pain receiving a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. The secondary aims are to compare effectiveness of PNE versus BS on pain, quality of life, kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, central sensitization at 3 months and at one year after the intervention. In addition, an exploratory analysis will be conducted to determine predictors of physical activity maintenance. The investigators expect to observe greater physical activity in patients who have received a PNE program compared to the physical activity of patients who have completed an BS program.
Exercise therapy has been shown to be effective in decreasing pain and improving function for patients with recurrent low back pain (LBP). Research on the mechanisms that trigger and/or underlie the effects of exercise therapy on LBP problems is of critical importance for the prevention of recurring or persistence of this costly and common condition. One factor that seems to be crucial within this context is the dysfunction of the back muscles. Recent pioneering results have shown that individuals with recurring episodes of LBP have specific dysfunctions of these muscles (peripheral changes) and also dysfunctions at the cortical level (central changes). This work provides the foundation to take a fresh look at the interplay between peripheral and central aspects, and its potential involvement in exercise therapy. The current project will draw on this opportunity to address the following research questions: What are the immediate (after a single session) and the long-term effects (after 18 repeated sessions) of exercise training on: (1) back muscle structure; (2) back muscle function; (3) the structure of the brain; (4) and functional connectivity of the brain. This research project also aims to examine whether the effects are dependent on how the training was performed. Therefore a specific versus a general exercise program will be compared.
Previous studies showed that some back pain patients (with specific characteristics) present less days with pain when treated with chiropractic maintenance care. A clinical instrument (called MAINTAIN instrument) was developed to identify those patients who would benefit from chiropractic maintenance care. This study will investigate the impact of using the MAINTAIN instrument in clinical practice. This study will help to improve clinical care of patients with back and neck pain by providing them with more individualized care.
Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Impaired postural control is a key factor in the development and maintenance of LBP. Moreover, the prevalence of LBP is associated with impairments in diaphragm function, symptoms of dyspnea, and dysfunctional breathing. However, the association between LBP (and more specifically postural control) and hyperventilation remains unknown. The main objective of this project is to investigate whether the presence of recurrent non-specific LBP is related to the presence of hyperventilation, when classified either objectively by decreased carbon dioxide values (demonstrating hypocapnia) or by symptoms while showing normal carbon dioxide values. Moreover, the investigators will explore whether psychosocial factors play a role in this relation. Subsequently, the investigators will examine whether hyperventilation in LBP patients is related to impaired postural control, and more specifically to a decreased postural contribution of the diaphragm.
Background: Low back pain, mainly nonspecific (NSLBP) is a major cause of pain and disability worldwide. Exercise therapy (ET) is considered as the first line treatment, and it is one of the treatment modalities most commonly used by physiotherapists. Yet, ET is reliant on the adherence of patients to its various components. Research has demonstrated a positive relationship between adherence to rehabilitation programs and recovery from a variety of musculoskeletal conditions. Therefore, factors that strengthen adherence to ET may increase its efficacy for NSLBP. Converging evidence from recent studies suggest that control and choice may increase adherence to various treatments. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of patient choice and preference on adherence and efficacy of exercise for recovery from NSLBP. Design: Matched case control study. Participants: Fifty subjects with chronic (>3 months) NSLBP. Twenty-five participants will be allocated to exercise by preference group, and 25 aged and gender controls will be allocated to exercise group. Inclusion criteria: 1. Non-specific low back pain (pain or discomfort in the lumbosacral area, with or without symptoms to the lower extremities), diagnosed by general physician or orthopedic surgeon. 2. Age 18-35 3. Chronic pain (greater than 3 months' duration). Exclusion Criteria: 1. Specific cause for LBP (rheumatic diseases, tumors, fractures, fibromyalgia, previous spinal surgery, pregnancy, low back pain after car or work accidents). 2. Previous (last three years) ET treatment for NSLBP. 3. Regularly performing exercise more than WHO's recommendation: - 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic physical activity throughout the week or at least 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity throughout the week or an equivalent combination of moderate- and vigorous-intensity activity. - Muscle-strengthening activities should be done involving major muscle groups on 2 or more days a week. Procedure: After initial assessment, participants in the intervention group will be asked to choose 3-4 items from a list of 10 general exercises - intended for treatment of low back pain. Each matched participant in the control group will receive the same exercise (without the option to choose). Participants will be instructed to perform their exercises three times a week, for a period of four weeks (12 sessions total). Outcomes: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Henry-Eckert Performance Assessment Tool (HEPA) Both measurements will be taken on the first and last meeting. Additionally, each participant will fill a personal weekly exercise log (selecting between complete \ incomplete \ lack of execution) - sent by e-mail.
The central scientific premise of the proposed study is that sleep disruption (SD) will influence individuals' subjective response to blinded medication administration. The investigators further believe these responses will vary among patients who have chronic low back pain (CLBP) vs. healthy controls, and that sex will moderate effects. The proposed study evaluates whether CLBP patients' subjective responses to study medication administration are altered by SD. The investigators focus on two outcome domains: abuse liability (i.e., drug liking and valuation) and response to pain testing. The investigators propose a mixed between-within randomized crossover human-laboratory experiment that investigates placebo-controlled effects of study medication on 1) abuse liability metrics (Drug Liking and Monetary Valuation) and 2) response to laboratory-evoked standardized pain measures, after one night of uninterrupted sleep (US) and again after one night of SD. The investigators will recruit both CLBP patients(*) and healthy controls (N = 60). (*) We originally aimed to accrue 60 subjects with CLBP. However, we have been granted approval by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) to reduce expectations for the target N for the CLBP cohort. We are no longer expected to recruit N=60 CLBP participants; this is a COVID-19 modification, and we are not required to re-do a power analysis.