Clinical Trials Logo

Loop Ileostomy clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Loop Ileostomy.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT03720262 Recruiting - Loop Ileostomy Clinical Trials

Prevention of Hernia After Loop Ileostomy Reversal

PHaLIR
Start date: March 1, 2018
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

PHaLIR is a prospective, double-blinded randomized study in which patients planned for stoma reversal after rectal cancer surgery are randomized between retro muscular mesh Ultrapro Advanced or standard treatment without mesh.

NCT ID: NCT03411096 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Colorectal Disorders

Quadratus Lumborum Block : Local Anesthesia Versus Placebo

Start date: April 8, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Opioid analgesics have many side effects. Quadratus lumborum (QL) block is one kind of regional nerve block that can reduce the side effects of opioid analgesics. The investigators hypothesize that QL block with local analgesics (ropivacaine) can significantly reduce pain intensity in comparison with placebo.

NCT ID: NCT02532478 Completed - Loop Ileostomy Clinical Trials

Fortune of Temporary Ileostomies in Patients After Rectal Cancer Surgery

Start date: February 2007
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The risk factors for stoma reversal failure have been rarely studied, which is probably one of the worst scenarios for a case who has a sphincter preserving procedure for a rectal cancer and is expecting to have regular bowel movements through a functional anus. Several studies have analyzed this particular issue and some have shown that up to 30% of 'temporary' stomas have never been closed. However these data have been criticized to be heterogeneous, since they have included patients with benign and malignant diseases, cases underwent elective or emergent anterior or low anterior resections or restorative proctocolectomy; and those with a colostomy or ileostomy, even an end stoma in some subjects. In addition, some studies have underlined some risk factors for the failure of stoma reversal, but they also have similar limitations as mentioned above. Finally, survival -to the best of investigators' knowledge- has never been separately studied in patients who cannot receive a stoma reversal procedure. Thus, current study aims to present a single-surgeon experience regarding the rate of diverting ileostomy takedown, the factors adversely affecting stoma reversal rate in patients underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer, and accordingly to expose the fortune of these cases.