View clinical trials related to LIP.
Filter by:This study aims to learn more about the effects of aging and lip filler treatment on lips and the surrounding skin by comparing, among two different age groups of people, changes in the blood vessels and nerves, volume, color and texture change before and after lip filler treatment and pain tolerance from lip filler treatment.
Lip support plays an important role in facial esthetics, being a relevant factor when realizing full arch implant supported rehabilitations. However, there is a lack of research on the three dimensional impact of such restorations.
This is a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, prospective, controlled clinical study to identify whether RHA® 3 is non-inferior to Restylane-L® for lip augmentation at Week 12 after the last treatment (initial or touch-up). At screening, the treating investigator (TI) will evaluate the subject's lip fullness using the validated Teoxane Lip Fullness Scale (5-grade) for eligibility of the subject for the study. At screening, the blinded live evaluator (BLE) will evaluate the subject's lip fullness using the TLFS to confirm eligibility and to establish a pre-treatment score for assessment of effectiveness. Enrolled subjects will be randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to either the RHA® 3 or the Restylane-L® treatment group. Subjects will be blinded to the study treatment. The TI will administer the fillers, and if necessary, subjects will receive a touch-up treatment 4 weeks after the initial treatment to optimize the results. If the touch-up treatment is administered, the subject will be asked to come to the site for an additional visit 4 weeks after the touch-up injection. The study duration was extended from 36 to 52 weeks once all subjects had already been enrolled. Nearly 60% of the subjects consented to extend the study to 52 weeks before being eligible for repeat treatment. All data are presented up to 52 weeks (as well as 4 more weeks follow-up after retreatment at 36 or 52 weeks). Subjects will be followed for 36 to 52 weeks after their last treatment (initial treatment or touch-up), at which point, they will be offered re-treatment with RHA® 3, regardless of their original treatment, provided that the TI deems the treatment to be appropriate and the subject agrees. Reasons for not administering the re-treatment will be documented. The subject will then be followed for an additional 4 weeks before exiting the study. If the subject or the TI declines re-treatment, this visit (36 or 52 weeks after the last treatment) will be considered the study Exit visit. For subjects with re-treatment, the Exit visit will be 4 weeks after the re-treatment. The TI will conduct safety and effectiveness evaluations at each study visit (up to 36 weeks or 52 (if applicable) weeks after the last treatment, and 4 weeks after re treatment) or until all treatment-related ongoing adverse events (AEs) have resolved or resolved with sequelae as per TI judgment or if follow-up is no longer possible.
There is need for evidence-based and reproducible data comparing the safety, longevity and patient satisfaction propensity of the various HA soft tissue filler products. Among cosmetic HA soft tissue filler procedures, especially the lip augmentation has become common. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine whether a statistically significant difference can be detected in the safety, longevity and/or patient satisfaction related to four HA soft tissue filler products widely used for cosmetic lip augmentation. Specifically, the aim of this study is to determine whether superiority of one or more product(s) over the others can be detected.
This pilot clinical trial studies how well metformin hydrochloride works in affecting cytokines and exosomes in patients with head and neck cancer. Metformin hydrochloride may reduce the metabolic activity of cancer cells and of surrounding supportive tissues.