Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

There is need for evidence-based and reproducible data comparing the safety, longevity and patient satisfaction propensity of the various HA soft tissue filler products. Among cosmetic HA soft tissue filler procedures, especially the lip augmentation has become common. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine whether a statistically significant difference can be detected in the safety, longevity and/or patient satisfaction related to four HA soft tissue filler products widely used for cosmetic lip augmentation. Specifically, the aim of this study is to determine whether superiority of one or more product(s) over the others can be detected.


Clinical Trial Description

Rationale: Currently, hyaluronic acid (HA) soft tissue fillers are widely employed in cosmetic medical practice for facial contouring and rejuvenation. Among these procedures, especially the lip augmentation has become common. To this end various products have become commercially available, however to date no robust evidence is available to support the safety, longevity or patient satisfaction propensity superiority of one product over the others. Objective: To assess whether superiority in safety, longevity and patient satisfaction propensity can be shown of one of four most frequently used FDA-approved and/or CE marked HA fillers worldwide, used to augment the lip, over the others. Study design: Multi-center, randomized, controlled, four group, parallel, triple-blind clinical trial of 160 adult participants. Study population: Consecutive healthy individuals with no history of previous lip treatment and a self-reported wish for lip augmentation, who present at one of the private cosmetic medicine clinics in the Netherlands, will be recruited. Intervention (if applicable): After giving informed consent, participants will be randomized to receive a protocoled lip augmentation procedure by the injection of either 1 mL of brand A, B, C or D. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome measure will be the absolute lip volume augmentation as measured by the Lemperle Lip Index from baseline to 3-months follow-up. Secondary outcomes will include the incidence of serious adverse reactions and side effects related to the procedure, the absolute volume augmentation from baseline to 2-weeks follow-up and self-reported quality of life and satisfaction with aesthetic results from baseline to 2-weeks follow-up as measured by validated FACE-Q questionnaire scores. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04362891
Study type Interventional
Source Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date July 5, 2021
Completion date January 12, 2022

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT03529422 - Durvalumab With Radiotherapy for Adjuvant Treatment of Intermediate Risk SCCHN Phase 2
Completed NCT04540913 - RHA® 3 Versus Restylane-L® for Lip Augmentation
Completed NCT04839692 - Assessment and Augmentation of Lip Appearance in Specific Study Populations Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT06052501 - 3D Evaluation of the Lip Support in a Full-arch Implant-supported Rehabilitations
Completed NCT04753866 - Facial Scanning for Lip Support Assessment in Full Arch Implant Rehabilitations N/A
Completed NCT03109873 - Metformin Hydrochloride in Affecting Cytokines and Exosomes in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Early Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT03854032 - Nivolumab and BMS986205 in Treating Patients With Stage II-IV Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT03076281 - Metformin Hydrochloride and Doxycycline in Treating Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma That Can Be Removed by Surgery Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT05610293 - T1 Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Lip