View clinical trials related to Lichen Sclerosus Et Atrophicus.
Filter by:This is a randomized placebo-controlled trial design to determine whether combining FxCO2-laser with the traditional therapy of clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment (combined treatment) as compared to FxCO2-laser and placebo ointment (FxCO2-laser only) will improve treatment response in women undergoing FxCO2-laser for vulvar lichen sclerosus. Primary objective: To evaluate if women with LS who undergo FxCO2 laser therapy and concomitant TCS (clobetasol group) have higher treatment success (defined as a MCID of a ≥16 point improvement in Skindex-29 questionnaire) than those who undergo FxCO2 laser and placebo ointment (placebo group). - Hypothesis: A higher proportion of women randomized to clobetasol will achieve treatment success as compared to those randomized to placebo. - Approach: The proportion of women in each cohort who obtain a ≥16 point improvement in Skindex-29 validated questionnaire score from baseline to final visit will be compared. Secondary objectives: To compare change in pre- and post-treatment scores on validated questionnaires measuring vulvovaginal symptoms, sexual function, lower urinary tract function, and genital self-image between the clobetasol group compared to the placebo group. - Hypothesis: Women randomized to clobetasol will demonstrate an equal or greater improvement on validated quality of life questionnaires measuring vulvovaginal symptoms, sexual function, lower urinary tract function, and genital self-image as compared to women randomized to placebo. - Approach: Change scores will be calculated to determine change per participant over the treatment period and mean change scores will be compared between cohorts.
Primary aim of the trial is to compare improvement of lichen symptoms according to a composite VAS scale (burning, itching and pain) between women with vulvovaginal laser therapy vs. sham laser therapy at three months.
Subjects with vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) will undergo fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser treatment to the vulvar area. Subjects will be evaluated for changes in clinical signs and architectural changes associated with VLS at designated follow-ups to 1-year post treatment series.
The object of this non-randomized, prospective study is to assess the effectiveness of ablative fractional 2940 nm laser treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus. Aim 1: To assess physical and histological changes related to vulvar lichen sclerosus before and after laser treatment. Aim 2: To evaluate participant satisfaction for laser treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus. The results of this study will determine whether fractional 2940 nm laser is an effective treatment option for lichen sclerosus, particularly for those participants not eligible for high-dose topical steroids or who have failed prior treatment with topical steroids.
Aim of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic effect of the laser treatment in vulvar LS, mainly the reduction of existing symptoms. As measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) symptoms as itching, burning, pain will be determined six weeks after the last laser treatment. Secondary endpoints will be sexual function measured with the female sexual function index (FSFI) and the vulvar skin changes measured by the Lichen score (LS). Regular photo-documentation of the treated skin will demonstrate a potential change of the tissue.
The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Er:YAG laser for treatment of different gynecological indication, e.g. genital lesions, Bartholin's cyst, condyloma, episiotomy scars, lesions of hydradenitis suppurativa and use of laser in genital surgery used in private practice.
LIQUENIA clinical trial is a phase II, controlled, prospective and unicentric study to assess vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) treatment using adipose tissue associated with autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) coming from the inner side of the patients' thighs, which aims to restore the structure and elasticity of the affected vulvar subunits, and to improve vulvar subunits lesions and symptoms, therefore, patients' quality of life from the early phases of the treatment.
The aim of this study is to test a new, minimally invasive dual laser technique to treat vulvar lichen sclerosus. Efficacy and safety of the thermal non-ablative Nd:YAG laser and the ablative Er:YAG laser is determined and compared to the current standard treatment with high dose steroids. The hypothesis is that laser therapy is effective and similar to standard steroid therapy.
This explorative investigation will assess the adhesion and tolerability of the Rivelin® plain patch when applied directly on lesions in subjects with Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus (VLS).
Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a skin condition of the external genitals (vulva) of women. LS causes vulvar itching, pain, and burning. In addition, LS causes scarring of the vulva which may cause significant sexual dysfunction or pain. Lastly, 4-6% of women with LS will develop vulvar cancer. The current "gold standard" treatment for lichen sclerosus is potent steroids creams. When used correctly, steroid creams help to decrease the symptoms of itching and burning and can prevent further vulvar scarring. In addition, proper treatment reverses the underlying inflammation of LS, and may lower the risk of getting cancer. While useful, steroid creams may have serious side effects that include thinning of the skin, fungal infections, and lowering the immune system. Recently, microablative fractional CO 2 laser treatment (FxCO 2 ) (SmartXide 2 V 2 LR laser system, for MonaLisa Touch, DEKA, Florence, Italy) has been proposed for the management of LS. Specifically, two small studies demonstrated that FxCO 2 therapy appears to be a promising treatment modality to treat lichen sclerosus. These studies demonstrated that FxCO 2 treatment may stimulate tissue healing in LS. Furthermore, by reducing inflammation, the clinical symptoms of LS, such as intense itching and burning, were improved. While these studies showed good success, these studies were limited because of their small size and lack of sham (fake treatment) control. The purpose of this study is to look at the efficacy (how well it works) and the safety of the FxCO 2 laser treatment (laser energy emitted) for LS as compared to a sham treatment (very minimal laser energy will be emitted).