View clinical trials related to Leukemia, Myeloid.
Filter by:In recent years, the curative effect of AML has been greatly improved. However, 20% - 30% of young patients and 40% - 50% of old patients will relapse again. Its re induction response rate is low, the survival period is short, and the prognosis is very poor. At present, there is no standard treatment scheme. Although a small number of patients can benefit from allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo HSCT), most patients lack suitable donors. The choice of high-dose chemotherapy is a rescue treatment scheme, but the treatment-related hematology or non hematology related toxicity and high mortality make the scheme controversial, especially for the elderly. Some studies have proposed a new treatment method combining chemotherapy with peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell infusion after mobilization of HLA mismatched donors. Preliminary clinical studies verified that after more than 70 cases of elderly acute myeloid leukemia were treated with microtransplantation, the complete remission rate reached 80%, the 2-year disease-free survival rate reached 39%, the early mortality rate was only 6.7%, and the median recovery time of neutrophils and platelets was 11 and 14.5 days, respectively, which was significantly different from the control group of chemotherapy alone. After that, the micro transplantation technology was extended to the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome and lymphoma, and good results were also obtained. Compared with peripheral blood / bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells, umbilical cord blood (UCB) hematopoietic stem cells have the advantages of rapid access, convenient source, no harm to donors, and low requirements for HLA matching. The immune cells in cord blood hematopoietic stem cells are mostly Na ï ve and immature immune cells, so the incidence and severity of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after unrelated cord blood transplantation are low, which not only reduces the failure of transplantation due to GVHD, but also avoids a series of complications and high costs brought by complex GVHD prevention and treatment techniques. Because cord blood is rich in CD16 + CD56 + NK cells and CD3 + T cells, cord blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation also plays an important role in GVL.
The CD123-Targeted CAR-NK cell therapy is a new treatment that is being investigated for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of CD123-CAR NK cells given to these patients.
This research study is studying a new drug, uproleselan, to see if it is safe and effective in decreasing relapse after stem cell transplant and improving leukemia-free survival in pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The name of the study drugs involved in this study are: - Uproleselan - Busulfan - Clofarabine - Fludarabine - Tacrolimus - Methotrexate - Mycophenolate Mofetil
This study will evaluate whether processing blood stem cell transplants using an investigational device (the CliniMACS system) results in less complications for patients undergoing transplant for treatment of a blood malignancy (cancer) or blood disorder.
To explore the effect of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) health education standard path on the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A total of 60 patients with acute myeloid leukemia in Shijiazhuang Ping An Hospital were selected and divided into control group (n=30) and observation group (n=30) according to the time of admission. Both groups received the same chemotherapy, the control group received routine nursing, and the observation group received TCM health education standard path intervention. The scores of Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), Spitzer Quality of Life Index (QLI), awareness of TCM health education standard path content and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups.
The purpose of the study is to determine the safety of combining the drugs gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) with CPX-351 in order to treat the disease, as well as to find the maximum tolerated dose level and recommended Phase 2 dose level of GO with a fixed dose of CPX-351.
This phase II MyeloMATCH treatment trial compares cytarabine versus (vs.) cytarabine and venetoclax vs. liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine and venetoclax vs. azacitidine and venetoclax for treating patients who have residual disease after treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Cytarabine is in a class of medications called antimetabolites. It works by slowing or stopping the growth of cancer cells in the body. Venetoclax is in a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. It may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking Bcl-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. Liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine is a drug formulation that delivers daunorubicin and cytarabine in small spheres called liposomes, which may make the drugs safer or more effective. Azacitidine is a drug that interacts with DNA and leads to the activation of tumor suppressor genes, which are genes that help control cell growth. This study may help the study doctors find out if the different drug combinations are equally effective to the usual approach of cytarabine alone while requiring a shorter duration of treatment. To decide if they are better, the study doctors will be looking to see if the study drugs lead to a higher percentage of patients achieving a deeper remission compared to cytarabine alone.
This phase II MyeloMATCH treatment trial tests whether the standard approach of cytarabine and daunorubicin in comparison to the following experimental regimens works to shrink cancer in patients with high risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML): 1) daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome alone; 2) cytarabine and daunorubicin with venetoclax; 3) azacitidine and venetoclax; 4) daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome and venetoclax. "High-risk" refers to traits that have been known to make the AML harder to treat. Cytarabine is in a class of medications called antimetabolites. It works by slowing or stopping the growth of cancer cells in the body. Daunorubicin is in a class of medications called anthracyclines. It also works by slowing or stopping the growth of cancer cells in the body. Azacitidine is in a class of medications called demethylation agents. It works by helping the bone marrow to produce normal blood cells and by killing abnormal cells. Venetoclax is in a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. It may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking Bcl-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. There is evidence that these newer experimental treatment regimens may work better in getting rid of more AML compared to the standard approach of cytarabine and daunorubicin.
This phase II MyeloMATCH treatment trial compares cytarabine with daunorubicin versus cytarabine with daunorubicin and venetoclax versus venetoclax with azacitidine for the treatment of younger patients with intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Cytarabine is a drug that inhibits some of the enzymes needed for deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) replication and repair and can slow or stop the growth of cancer cells. Daunorubicin is a drug that blocks a certain enzyme needed for cell division and DNA repair, and it may kill cancer cells. Venetoclax is in a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. It may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking Bcl-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. Azacitidine is a drug that interacts with DNA to activate tumor-suppressing genes, resulting in an anti-tumor effect. Adding venetoclax to cytarabine and daunorubicin, and adding venetoclax to azacitidine, may work better than the usual treatment of cytarabine with daunorubicin alone. To decide if they are better, the study doctors are looking to see if venetoclax increases the rate of elimination of AML in participants by 20% or more compared to the usual approach.
This is a single-center, single-arm, open-label phase I clinical study to determine the safety and efficacy of LILRB4 STAR-T cells in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia subjects.