View clinical trials related to Left Ventricle Remodeling.
Filter by:Dapagliflozin is a molecule belonging to the class of sodium-glucose transporter type 2 (SGLT2-i) inhibitors. This type of drug, initially used in the treatment of diabetes mellitus, has in recent years demonstrated significant prognostic benefit in patients with heart failure even in the absence of diabetes mellitus. The new international heart failure guidelines have taken up this evidence by suggesting the use of SGLT2-i therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Given the drug's recent introduction into clinical routine, the evaluation of "field" experience is important to refine the clinical management of patients treated with SGLT2-i. Moreover, SGLT2-i has currently been shown to be effective in some small preliminary studies in improving ejection fraction and some echocardiographic parameters of ventricular remodelling on top of concomitant optimal medical therapy, although further data are needed in this regard. In particular, the potential benefit of SGLT2-i therapy on exercise capacity, respiratory function parameters, biomarkers and left ventricular remodelling in patients with heart failure has not been extensively studied at present. In this regard, the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) allows the derivation of prognostic functional parameters in patients with chronic heart failure such as peak VO2 and the ventilation/CO2 slope. CPET is a valid, recognised and accurate tool for risk stratification in patients with heart failure. In addition, there are no data available on the effect of SGLT2-i on lung diffusion (DLCO) and specific markers of the alveolar-capillary membrane, such as surfactant binding proteins, as well as on the presence of sleep apnoea, a particularly relevant parameter for the prognosis of decompensated patients. The aim of the study is to evaluate changes in exercise capacity, spirometry, DLCO, echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular systolic-diastolic function, Nt-proBNP dosage, ST-2, surfactant binding proteins, sleep apnoea, impedance measurement and quality of life in a single-centre cohort of 70 patients with heart failure with stable reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (functional class NYHA II and III) and guideline candidates for treatment with Dapagliflozin. Patients will undergo, as per regular clinical practice, an initial assessment (baseline) that will include a clinical evaluation, KCCQ questionnaire for quality of life assessment, spirometry, DLCO, impedance measurement, polysomnography, a cardiopulmonary ramp test, blood tests with dosage of Nt-proBNP, ST-2 and surfactant binding protein, and a standard transthoracic echocardiogram. At baseline, the patient will start treatment with Dapagliflozin at the standard dosage of 10mg/day. A similar evaluation with the same study procedures will be performed 6 months after the start of therapy. A re-evaluation of the patient including venous blood sampling is planned between 2 and 4 weeks after the start of Dapagliflozin from clinical practice. In the context of this sampling, the assay of the biomarkers under study will also be repeated.
Heart failure (HF) is the most common nosology encountered in clinical practice. Its incidence and prevalence increase exponentially with increasing age and it is associated with increased mortality, more frequent hospitalization and decreased quality of life. An initial approach to the treatment of HF patients with reduced left ventricular (LV) systolic function and left bundle branch block (LBBB) was implantation of cardioresynchronization device using biventricular pacing. This has resulted in long-term clinical benefits such as improved quality of life, increased functional capacity, reduced HF hospitalizations and overall mortality. However, conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective in only 70% of patients. And the remaining 30% of patients are non-responders to conventional CRT. Subsequently, His bundle pacing (HBP) has been developed to achieve the same results. According to other studies HBP has showed greater improvement in hemodynamic parameters than with conventional biventricular CRT. But, nevertheless, there are significant clinical troubles with HBP. In this regard, in 2017, the left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) was developed, which demonstrated clinical advantages compared to biventricular CRT. This method has become an alternative to HBP due to the stimulation of LBB outside the blocking site, a stable pacing threshold and a narrow QRS duration. A series of case reports and observational studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of LBBP in patients with CRT indications. However, it is not enough data about CRT with LBBP effectiveness in LV remodeling, reducing mortality and complications. According to our hypothesis, CRT with LBBP compared with conventional biventricular CRT will significantly improve the clinical outcomes and reverse LV remodeling in patients with chronic HF with reduced LV ejection fraction and reduce the number of non-responders to conventional CRT.
Heart failure (HF) is the most common nosology encountered in clinical practice. Its incidence and prevalence increase exponentially with increasing age and it is associated with the increased mortality, more frequent hospitalization and decreased quality of life. An initial approach to the treatment of HF patients with reduced left ventricular (LV) systolic function and left bundle branch block (LBBB) was implantation of device for cardiac resynchronization therapy using biventricular pacing. This has resulted in long-term clinical benefits such as improved quality of life, increased functional capacity, reduced HF hospitalizations and overall mortality. However, conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective in only 70% of patients. And the remaining 30% of patients are non-responders to conventional CRT. Cardiac conduction system pacing is currently a promising technique for these patients. Particularly, His bundle pacing (HBP) has been developed to achieve the same results. According to other studies HBP has shown greater improvement in hemodynamic parameters comparing with conventional biventricular CRT. But, nevertheless, there are significant clinical troubles with HBP, especially high pacing threshold. In this regard, in 2017, the left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) was developed, which demonstrated clinical advantages compared to conventional biventricular CRT. Also, since 2019, left bundle branch pacing-optimized CRT (LBBPO CRT) has been used in clinical practice. These methods have become an alternative to HBP due to the stimulation of LBB outside the blocking site, a stable pacing threshold and a narrow QRS complex duration on electrocardiogram. A series of case reports and observational studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of LBBP and LBBPO CRT in patients with CRT indications. However, it is not enough data about impact of CRT with LBBP and combined CRT with LBBP and LV pacing on myocardial remodeling, reducing mortality and complications. According to our hypothesis, CRT with LBBP and combined CRT with LBBP and LV pacing compared with conventional biventricular pacing will significantly improve the clinical outcomes and reverse myocardial remodeling in patients who are non-responders to biventricular CRT with HF, reduced LV ejection fraction and with indications to CRT devices with defibrillator function (CRT-D) or one of the CRT-D leads replacement.
A prospective, multi-center, single-arm study. This study will enroll a maximum of 35 subjects treated with the Revivent TC System.
- To detect long-term effects of left ventricular remodeling in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI. - And to evaluate outcome.
role of different risk scores in acute coronary syndrome to predict left ventricular remodeling