Laryngeal Masks Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of the Supraorbital Pressure and Jaw Thrust as Indicators for Depth of Anesthesia for Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion in Children
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study is to assess whether the loss of motor response to supraorbital
pressure can be an alternative to that of jaw thrust to predict optimal condition for
laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion in children.
METHODOLOGY
Fifty children (ASA I-II), aged 2 to 10 years, scheduled to receive general anesthesia that
required LMA insertion were randomized to receive either supraorbital pressure (SOP) (n = 25)
or jaw thrust (JT) (n = 25), after the loss of verbal response and body movements with a
standard anesthetic. When motor response to the study intervention was absent, the LMA was
inserted.
The investigators enrolled fifty consecutive participants (aged one to ten years) with ASA
physical status I or II scheduled to receive general anesthesia for various surgical
procedures. Participants were allowed to have solid food, formula milk or cow's milk up to
six hours, mother's milk up to four hours and clear fluid up to two hours before surgery.
On reaching the pre-operative room, when the participant was still on mothers lap or on the
bed baseline measurements of non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP), pulse oximeter (SpO2) and
electrocardiography (ECG) were taken. Fifteen minutes before induction of anesthesia, all
participants were premedicated with ketamine, either 4mg/kg intramuscularly into the gluteal
region with 26 G needle, or with 0.5mg/kg intravenously if intravenous (IV) cannula was in
place.
Devices for ECG, SpO2 and NIBP monitoring were attached to the participant after arrival in
the operating room. IV line was then inserted, if not already present. Pre-oxygenation was
done with 100% oxygen using an appropriate size face mask. Anesthesia was induced with IV
fentanyl (2mcg/kg), and propofol (2-4 mg/kg) until the loss of response to verbal contact or
loss of eyelash reflex. Spontaneous ventilation was first assisted and then controlled
manually to maintain an end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure of 33-40 mmHg. No
neuromuscular blocking agent was administered.
Supraorbital pressure or jaw thrust was performed after loss of response to verbal contact,
or absence of body movements. In group SOP, supraorbital pressure was applied over the
supraorbital notch for five seconds. In group JT, the jaw thrust was applied gently by
lifting the angles of the mandible vertically upward for five seconds. An IV bolus dose of
propofol (1 mg/kg) was added if there was a motor response to the supraorbital pressure or
the jaw thrust and the test was repeated after ten seconds. A second bolus dose of propofol
was repeated if positive motor response was still present. A negative physical response to
the test was considered as the end point of induction to perform LMA insertion. A classic LMA
of appropriate size was inserted immediately. Ease of insertion and mouth opening,
development of coughing, swallowing, movement, laryngospasm, or gross purposeful movements
during or within one minute of LMA insertion and additional dosage of propofol if required
were recorded. The LMA insertion was considered unsuccessful if LMA could not be inserted
after administration of second bolus dose of propofol. The number of attempts and the
insertion conditions were recorded using a six variable three points scoring system(31)
- Mouth opening: 1 - Full, 2 - Partial (not ideal but permits easy opening of mouth), 3 -
Nil
- Ease of LMA insertion 1 - Easy, 2 - Difficult, 3 - Impossible.
- Swallowing: 1 - Nil, 2 - Mild, 3 - Severe
- Coughing: 1 - Nil, 2 - Mild, 3 - Severe
- Laryngospasm: 1 - Nil, 2 - Mild (relieved by positive pressure ventilation), 3 - Severe
(desaturation<90%)
- Movement: 1 - Nil, 2 - Mild (Finger) (some movement but did not affect positioning of
LMA), 3 - Severe (Arm/leg) (holding of LMA was required and additional dose of induction
agent given).
The investigators summed all the five scores to give a LMA insertion condition summed score
which ranged from 0 to 12, a lower summed score indicating more favourable LMA insertion
conditions.
Table: Laryngeal mask airway insertion score.
Variables 0 1 2
Mouth opening Complete Partial Impossible Ease of insertion Easy Difficult Impossible
Swallowing Nil Partial Complete Coughing Nil Partial Complete Laryngospasm Nil Partial
Complete Movement Nil Partial Gross
LMA cuff was inflated with air and was connected to Jackson-Rees modification of the Ayre's
T-piece. Effective ventilation was determined by observing chest wall and bag movement,
auscultation, and capnography.
Blood pressure, heart rate and percentage saturation of oxygen were recorded in the
pre-operative room, immediately after LMA insertion, five, ten and fifteen minutes after LMA
insertion.
Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. After the closure of skin incision,
removal of LMA was done when the participant was still in deep plane of anesthesia.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03619057 -
Voice Tessitura and Size of the Required Laryngeal Mask
|
||
Completed |
NCT04206592 -
Comparison of the Ambu AuraGain and Intersurgical i-Gel Laryngeal Masks in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03725540 -
Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure Monitoring Using Baska Versus I-gel Laryngeal Mask Airway
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03528590 -
Ventilation Efficacy of Size 3 or Size 4 I-gel in Female Patient Weighing 50 to 60 Kilograms
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03118596 -
Fibre-optic Guided Tracheal Intubation Through SADs
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03139292 -
Comparative Evaluation of Ambu AuraGain Laryngeal Mask and Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02938039 -
I-Gel vs Ambu Laryngeal Mask Airways in Infants and Children Undergoing Surgical Procedures
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01592760 -
Air-Q® SP Versus Air-Q® and I-gel
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04872881 -
Comparison of Effectiveness of Different Airway Management Methods During Percutaneous Tracheostomy
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03852589 -
The Effect of Placement of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway With C-Mac Videolaryngoscopy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02816463 -
RCT:Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP) - Ambu AuraGain vs LMA Supreme
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03140228 -
Postoperative Sore Throat in Children: Comparison Between Two Supraglottic Devices, Ambu® AuraOnceâ„¢ Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) and I-Gel®.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03247803 -
Air-Q® SP Versus Williams Intubating Airway for Single-Operator FOI
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03257800 -
Laryngeal Mask Insertion Conditions And Hemodynamic Effects
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03502590 -
IGEL Laryngeal Mask Airway Device Effectiveness in Irradiated Necks
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01704118 -
Comparison of Size 1 I-gel and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04229862 -
Effect of Head Elevation on LMA Insertion
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03931122 -
Comparison of Weight-based Versus External Ear-size Based Technique for Selection of Laryngeal Mask Airway in Pediatric Surgical Patients.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03006250 -
The Effect of Desflurane vs Sevoflurane on Perioperative Respiratory Complications in Laryngeal Mask Airway Anesthesia
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03028896 -
90° Rotation Technique for LMA FlexibleTM Insertion
|
N/A |