Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to assess whether the loss of motor response to supraorbital pressure can be an alternative to that of jaw thrust to predict optimal condition for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion in children.

METHODOLOGY

Fifty children (ASA I-II), aged 2 to 10 years, scheduled to receive general anesthesia that required LMA insertion were randomized to receive either supraorbital pressure (SOP) (n = 25) or jaw thrust (JT) (n = 25), after the loss of verbal response and body movements with a standard anesthetic. When motor response to the study intervention was absent, the LMA was inserted.


Clinical Trial Description

The investigators enrolled fifty consecutive participants (aged one to ten years) with ASA physical status I or II scheduled to receive general anesthesia for various surgical procedures. Participants were allowed to have solid food, formula milk or cow's milk up to six hours, mother's milk up to four hours and clear fluid up to two hours before surgery.

On reaching the pre-operative room, when the participant was still on mothers lap or on the bed baseline measurements of non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP), pulse oximeter (SpO2) and electrocardiography (ECG) were taken. Fifteen minutes before induction of anesthesia, all participants were premedicated with ketamine, either 4mg/kg intramuscularly into the gluteal region with 26 G needle, or with 0.5mg/kg intravenously if intravenous (IV) cannula was in place.

Devices for ECG, SpO2 and NIBP monitoring were attached to the participant after arrival in the operating room. IV line was then inserted, if not already present. Pre-oxygenation was done with 100% oxygen using an appropriate size face mask. Anesthesia was induced with IV fentanyl (2mcg/kg), and propofol (2-4 mg/kg) until the loss of response to verbal contact or loss of eyelash reflex. Spontaneous ventilation was first assisted and then controlled manually to maintain an end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure of 33-40 mmHg. No neuromuscular blocking agent was administered.

Supraorbital pressure or jaw thrust was performed after loss of response to verbal contact, or absence of body movements. In group SOP, supraorbital pressure was applied over the supraorbital notch for five seconds. In group JT, the jaw thrust was applied gently by lifting the angles of the mandible vertically upward for five seconds. An IV bolus dose of propofol (1 mg/kg) was added if there was a motor response to the supraorbital pressure or the jaw thrust and the test was repeated after ten seconds. A second bolus dose of propofol was repeated if positive motor response was still present. A negative physical response to the test was considered as the end point of induction to perform LMA insertion. A classic LMA of appropriate size was inserted immediately. Ease of insertion and mouth opening, development of coughing, swallowing, movement, laryngospasm, or gross purposeful movements during or within one minute of LMA insertion and additional dosage of propofol if required were recorded. The LMA insertion was considered unsuccessful if LMA could not be inserted after administration of second bolus dose of propofol. The number of attempts and the insertion conditions were recorded using a six variable three points scoring system(31)

- Mouth opening: 1 - Full, 2 - Partial (not ideal but permits easy opening of mouth), 3 - Nil

- Ease of LMA insertion 1 - Easy, 2 - Difficult, 3 - Impossible.

- Swallowing: 1 - Nil, 2 - Mild, 3 - Severe

- Coughing: 1 - Nil, 2 - Mild, 3 - Severe

- Laryngospasm: 1 - Nil, 2 - Mild (relieved by positive pressure ventilation), 3 - Severe (desaturation<90%)

- Movement: 1 - Nil, 2 - Mild (Finger) (some movement but did not affect positioning of LMA), 3 - Severe (Arm/leg) (holding of LMA was required and additional dose of induction agent given).

The investigators summed all the five scores to give a LMA insertion condition summed score which ranged from 0 to 12, a lower summed score indicating more favourable LMA insertion conditions.

Table: Laryngeal mask airway insertion score.

Variables 0 1 2

Mouth opening Complete Partial Impossible Ease of insertion Easy Difficult Impossible Swallowing Nil Partial Complete Coughing Nil Partial Complete Laryngospasm Nil Partial Complete Movement Nil Partial Gross

LMA cuff was inflated with air and was connected to Jackson-Rees modification of the Ayre's T-piece. Effective ventilation was determined by observing chest wall and bag movement, auscultation, and capnography.

Blood pressure, heart rate and percentage saturation of oxygen were recorded in the pre-operative room, immediately after LMA insertion, five, ten and fifteen minutes after LMA insertion.

Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. After the closure of skin incision, removal of LMA was done when the participant was still in deep plane of anesthesia. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT02618525
Study type Interventional
Source B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date February 2016
Completion date September 2017

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03619057 - Voice Tessitura and Size of the Required Laryngeal Mask
Completed NCT04206592 - Comparison of the Ambu AuraGain and Intersurgical i-Gel Laryngeal Masks in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy N/A
Recruiting NCT03725540 - Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure Monitoring Using Baska Versus I-gel Laryngeal Mask Airway
Recruiting NCT03528590 - Ventilation Efficacy of Size 3 or Size 4 I-gel in Female Patient Weighing 50 to 60 Kilograms N/A
Completed NCT03118596 - Fibre-optic Guided Tracheal Intubation Through SADs N/A
Completed NCT03139292 - Comparative Evaluation of Ambu AuraGain Laryngeal Mask and Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway N/A
Completed NCT02938039 - I-Gel vs Ambu Laryngeal Mask Airways in Infants and Children Undergoing Surgical Procedures N/A
Completed NCT01592760 - Air-Q® SP Versus Air-Q® and I-gel N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04872881 - Comparison of Effectiveness of Different Airway Management Methods During Percutaneous Tracheostomy Phase 4
Completed NCT03852589 - The Effect of Placement of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway With C-Mac Videolaryngoscopy N/A
Completed NCT02816463 - RCT:Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP) - Ambu AuraGain vs LMA Supreme N/A
Completed NCT03140228 - Postoperative Sore Throat in Children: Comparison Between Two Supraglottic Devices, Ambu® AuraOnceâ„¢ Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) and I-Gel®. N/A
Completed NCT03247803 - Air-Q® SP Versus Williams Intubating Airway for Single-Operator FOI N/A
Completed NCT03257800 - Laryngeal Mask Insertion Conditions And Hemodynamic Effects N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03502590 - IGEL Laryngeal Mask Airway Device Effectiveness in Irradiated Necks N/A
Completed NCT01704118 - Comparison of Size 1 I-gel and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask N/A
Completed NCT04229862 - Effect of Head Elevation on LMA Insertion N/A
Recruiting NCT03931122 - Comparison of Weight-based Versus External Ear-size Based Technique for Selection of Laryngeal Mask Airway in Pediatric Surgical Patients. N/A
Recruiting NCT03006250 - The Effect of Desflurane vs Sevoflurane on Perioperative Respiratory Complications in Laryngeal Mask Airway Anesthesia Phase 4
Completed NCT03028896 - 90° Rotation Technique for LMA FlexibleTM Insertion N/A