Laparotomy Clinical Trial
— PIBDOSEOfficial title:
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Postoperative Analgesia After Laparotomy: Determining the Optimum Dose Using a Biaised Coin Up-and-down Sequential Allocation Protocol
Pain control after surgery is a crucial component of postoperative recovery. Thus, in open abdominal surgery, the use of TEA (Thoracic epidural analgesia) has become a gold standard. However, analgesia may still remain a challenge, especially in patients with large incision abdominal incisions. To address this problem, the use of the PIEB (Programmed intermittent epidural bolus) mode has been proposed, because it offers a better spread of the epidural medication. Only a few studies have evaluated the superiority of this PIEB mode in open abdominal surgery, yielding conflicting results. However, PIEB showed to be at least as effective in controlling pain as CEI, and clinical experience shows that it can be a valuable tool, especially in patients with a large laparotomy incision. However, the optimal dosage of the PIEB mode has never been determined, Furthermore, it is known whether men and women have the same dosage needs to achieve adequate analgesia since most studies have failed to account for sex-based differences in postoperative analgesia. Hence, the main objective of this study will be to determine the optimal volume dose of the PIEB delivered at a fixed interval of 60 min in patients undergoing surgery using a large midline laparotomy incision. The optimal dose for male and female patients will be determined separately by evaluating men and women in two independent groups. We hypothesize that the optimal dose of the PIEB that will provide effective analgesia in 90% of patients on the first postoperative day will range between 5 and 10 mL, for both groups. The primary outcome in both groups is successful analgesia. It is defined as a requirement of 5 or less patient-controlled epidural boluses between 8 AM and 8 PM on the first postoperative day. Secondary outcomes will be the incidence of motor block and hypotension, comparison of the level of sensory block according to group, comparison of patient satisfaction according to group and comparison of Quality of Recovery-15 score at 48h post-op according to group.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 60 |
Est. completion date | April 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 85 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - 18-85 years old - ASA I to III Exclusion Criteria: - Contraindication to TEA: Coagulopathy, sepsis or local infection at the epidural insertion site, patient refusal - Inability to site the epidural catheter - Inability to use PCEA/Communication barrier - Daily opioid use - Planned postoperative admission to the intensive care unit - Patient refusal - Predefined criteria for exclusion after inclusion: Failure to obtain a sensory block to ice in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)(see Methods), Reoperation within 1 postoperative day |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital | Montréal | Quebec |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal |
Canada,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Successful analgesia | Defined by a requirement of a maximum of 5 Patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) boluses on postoperative day 1 | from 8 AM until 8 PM on the first postoperative day | |
Secondary | Incidence of motor block according to group | Incidence of Bromage Scale score of at least 3 (bromage motor blockade score from 1-4 where 1: complete motor blockade and 4: absence of motor block) | At 24h postoperatively | |
Secondary | Incidence of hypotension according to group | Systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg | At 24h postoperatively | |
Secondary | level of sensory block to ice according to group | Comparison of the level of sensory block to ice according to group (measured using loss of sensation to cold using an ice cube) | At 24h postoperatively | |
Secondary | Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score | Comparison of Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score according to group (scale of 0-150 where 0: very poor recovery and 150: best possible recovery) | At 48 h postoperatively | |
Secondary | Pain score at rest-24h | Intensity of pain at rest at 24h postoperatively using a verbal numeric pain score (0-10: 0 : no pain, 10: worst imaginable pain) | at 24h postoperatively | |
Secondary | Pain score with movement-24h | Intensity of pain with movement at 24h postoperatively using a verbal numeric pain score (0-10: 0 : no pain, 10: worst imaginable pain) | at 24h postoperatively |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT03234543 -
Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Abdominal Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03827291 -
QL Block With Exparel in Colectomy
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01719796 -
Effect of TAP Block on Ventilatory Function Following Abdominal Surgery
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02596269 -
Nefopam/Fentanyl Postoperative Intravenous Patient-Controlled-Analgesia
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01723280 -
Supplemental Oxygen - Effect on Occurrence of Subsequent Cancer After Abdominal Surgery (Follow-up of the PROXI Trial)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00364741 -
Supplemental Oxygen and Complications After Abdominal Surgery (The PROXI-trial)
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT00514566 -
PDS vs Polyamide for Midline Abdominal Closure
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06089551 -
Early vs Postponed Parenteral Nutrition After Emergency Abdominal Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03966768 -
DuraMesh Laparotomy Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04985695 -
Influence of Analgesic Technique on Post Operative Rehabilitation After Median Laparotomy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03739944 -
Different Surgical Approaches in Patients of Early-stage Cervical Cancer
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT01890408 -
Continuous Preperitoneal Infusion of Ropivacaine After Open Liver Resection: Effect on Post-operative Recovery and Morbidity.
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00544583 -
Continuous Versus Interrupted Abdominal Wall Closure After Emergency Midline Laparotomy
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04256798 -
Perioperative Respiratory Care and Outcomes for Patients Undergoing High Risk Abdominal Surgery
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03738969 -
Longitudinal Study of Different Surgical Approaches in Chinese Patients of Uterine Cervical Cancer
|
||
Completed |
NCT03989570 -
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04266535 -
TCI vs Manually Controlled Infusion of Propofol
|
||
Completed |
NCT04065607 -
Indications and Outcome of Laparostomy
|
||
Completed |
NCT00637936 -
Respiratory Effects of Perioperative Oxygen During General Anaesthesia
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01040013 -
Gut Oxygenation and Laparoscopy
|
Phase 2 |