Lacerations Clinical Trial
— GLUEOfficial title:
Pretreatment of Lacerations With Topical LET (Lidocaine-Epinephrine-Tetracaine) Reduces Pain During Tissue Adhesive Repair in Children: Double-blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Efficacy
Verified date | April 2013 |
Source | Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | Canada: Health Canada |
Study type | Interventional |
Minor lacerations are a commonly treated injury in the paediatric emergency department . Over the past decade, standard closure of these lacerations has evolved from suture repair to closure with tissue adhesive (also referred to as "skin glue"). Local anaesthetic is not routinely used during application of skin glue as it was with sutures. There are, however, several potential advantages to pre-treating wounds with topical LET (Lidocaine-Epinephrine-Tetracaine), a liquid gel with anaesthetic and vasoconstrictive properties. Some believe LET can improve patient comfort, increase the ease of glue application, and lead to better healing when used on lacerations being repaired with tissue adhesive. This study aims to address the question of whether or not pre-treatment with LET improves outcomes in minor lacerations repaired with skin glue. The primary hypothesis is that pre-treatment of minor lacerations with LET will decrease pain (as measured on a Visual Analog Scale) during repair with tissue adhesive.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 222 |
Est. completion date | April 2012 |
Est. primary completion date | January 2012 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | N/A to 17 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - aged 0 to 17 years inclusive; - with a laceration that is less than 3 cm in length (the upper limit recommended for tissue adhesive repair by the manufacturer). - with said laceration on the face, torso, trunk or extremities; - with said laceration deemed by the treating physician to be appropriate for repair via tissue adhesive Exclusion Criteria: - the wound for study needs debridement or suturing prior to first glue attempt - said wound is an animal or human bite or scratch wound, puncture wound, stellate crush wound, wound crossing mucocutaneous junctions, a scalp laceration, an ear laceration, a wound crossing a joint line, a wound on the fingers or toes, or a wound in an area of concentrated hair such as the eyebrow - the patient has a history of keloid formation or - a known allergy to cyanoacrylates or - is presently taking oral steroids, immunostimulants, anticoagulants or other medications known to impair wound healing or haemostasis; or - has a known diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus or Vascular Insufficiency |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Ottawa | Ontario |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario |
Canada,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Pain of Procedure Rating | Patients will rate the pain experienced during their procedure on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (in paitents age 6 and under, parents will rate what pain they believe their child experienced). | 2 minutes post-procedure | No |
Secondary | Wound Cosmesis | Patients will return 3 months post laceration repair for a photograph on their wound. Plastic surgeons blinded to the treatment arm will rate the wound cosmesis via the photographs on a validated 100 mm Visual Analog Scale | measured at 3 month f/u visit | No |
Secondary | Ease of procedure as measured by treating physician | Immediately after the procedure, the treating physician will rate how easy the repair was on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale. | 5 minutes post-procedure | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT00524888 -
Suturing vs Biological Adhesive in Simple Lacerations of Hand
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03688880 -
A Clinical Study to Compare MAR-CUTIS With Dermabond Advanced
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04203225 -
Comparison of Two Application Techniques for LET Gel
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00328796 -
Acupuncture for Pain Relief During Perineal Repair After Childbirth
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02703233 -
Effectiveness of Nitrous Oxide in the ED
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02333877 -
Comparison of Skinlink With Suture for ED Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02618772 -
Intranasal Midazolam for Treatment of Anxiety in Children Undergoing Suturing in the Pediatric Emergency Department
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01053637 -
Pain and Anxiety Management With Oral Narcotic for Pediatric Suture Repair
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01925898 -
A Randomized, Clinical Trial of Oral Midazolam Versus Oral Ketamine for Sedation During Laceration Repair.
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00547638 -
Study to Show Equivalence of DERMABOND PROTAPE to DERMABOND HVD for Wound Closure
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT00933829 -
Comparison of Cosmetic Outcomes of Lacerations Repaired Using Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Sutures
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00681070 -
Cosmetic Outcomes of Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Sutures in Pediatric Facial Lacerations
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03830515 -
Evaluation of microMend Device to Close Lacerations
|
N/A |