View clinical trials related to Lacerations.
Filter by:The investigators propose a pilot study to examine the feasibility of utilizing immersive virtual reality to reduce procedural anxiety in children undergoing non-facial laceration repair in the Pediatric Emergency Department. The investigators hypothesize that virtual reality will be well-received by patients and their caregivers, and that the anxiety provoked by laceration repair will be mitigated by the immersive virtual reality experience.
Background: TAVR is a common therapy for people with heart problems. It stands for transcatheter aortic valve replacement, TAVR can be a better option than surgery. But it isn t safe for everyone. It may block the arteries that supply blood to the heart muscle by pushing heart valve tissue outward. Researchers want to study a method that may make TAVR safer. It is known as Bioprosthetic or native Aortic Scallop Intentional Laceration to prevent Iatrogenic Coronary Artery obstruction (BASILICA). Objective: To study the feasibility and safety of BASILICA in people at high risk of coronary artery obstruction that complicates TAVR. Eligibility: People at least 21 years old whose heart doctors do not think they can have TAVR safely Design: Participants will be screened by a team of heart specialists. They will have heart and blood tests. They will answer questions. Participants will have TAVR using BASILICA. They will get general anesthesia or they will be sedated. While using x-rays and echocardiography, doctors will cross and split the aortic valve leaflet using an electrified wire. A standard TAVR valve will be implanted. After the procedure, participants will have blood tests and physical exams. They will answer questions. They will have heart tests. Participants will have a scan within 1 month and after 12 months. They will have heart tests during follow-up visits in the first year. Sponsoring Institute: National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute
This is a study evaluating the use of the modified beef tongue model for teaching repair of obstetrical fourth-degree laceration to residents. Participants will be randomized to either an instructional video using the modified beef tongue model or to an instructional workshop using the modified beef tongue model. Primary outcome will be measured as change in technical skills score as measured by change from baseline on a validated objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSTATS) for repair of fourth-degree laceration.
Hand and feet lacerations are common in children with repair often requiring conscious sedation and needle sticks for repair. Growing evidence in adults reveal that many of these small lacerations do quite well cosmetically without intervention. This randomized controlled trial will evaluated the cosmetic outcome at 4 months in two groups of children with hand or feet lacerations <2 cm comparing suturing vs conservative wound management.
There are several methods of closing a skin cut: stitches, skin glue, and medical tape. Stitches have been used for a long time to close skin cuts. Skin glue (invented in the 1970s) and medical tape (invented in the 1960s) are two newer methods to close skin cuts. The purpose of this study is to find out which method (stitches, skin glue, or medical tape) of closing skin cuts results in the least amount of scarring. Other things the investigators will be looking at are which method is the cheapest, which causes the least pain, which requires the least amount of sedation, and which method patients and parents like the best.
The Zip-009 clinical investigation will enroll 26 paediatric and adult subjects requiring laceration repair and fulfilling the eligibility criteria for the clinical investigation. The investigation is designed to evaluate the time and cost savings and the satisfaction and outcomes of the Zip device compared to conventional sutures. The subjects will be randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to either the Zip Surgical Skin Closure Device group or the Standard of Care sutures group. The investigation consists of one screening/baseline visits at day 0 where the subject will be treated with either the Zip device or sutures, and thereafter two follow up telephone calls at day 10 and day 30. The Zip device/sutures will be removed prior the first follow up call day 10. The duration of the investigation is estimated to 5 months, including a 4-month recruitment period and 1-month follow up period.
To evaluate the rates of dyspareunia with rapidly absorbing polyglactin 910 compared to poliglecaprone 25 using a validated sexual function questionnaire. To assess maternal satisfaction with the laceration repair and suture material. To assess overall perineal pain using a visual analog scale. To assess the rate of wound breakdown and the need for suture removal.
We propose a prospective, randomized, single blinded trial with subjects recruited from the WRNMMC Labor and Delivery Unit to study post-partum efficacy of Exparel® for pain control in patients undergoing a vaginal delivery who sustained a second, third, or fourth degree obstetrical laceration. Subjects who meet inclusion criteria and agree to participate in the study will be consented upon admission for active labor or induction of labor and will be randomized to receive either 20mL of liposomal bupivacaine or 20ml of 0.25% plain bupivacaine, infiltrated through the perineum at completion of their obstetrical repair. Current standard of care is to receive no injection of local anesthetic upon completion of the repair. The primary aim of the trial will be to evaluate post-partum pain using a visual analogue pain scale at days 1, 3 and 7 postpartum. All subjects will have acetaminophen, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and narcotic pain medication available for pain control regardless of assignment, which is the usual post-partum pain control regimen. We anticipate a 30% difference in post-operative pain measurements between the Exparel® group and the plain bupivacaine group. Other aims of this study are to evaluate total medication usage, comparing the study group to the control, and compare quality of life measures between the two study groups.
The objective of this project is to compare the sedative effects of intranasal midazolam versus inhaled nitrous oxide (N2O) for minor procedures in the pediatric emergency department. The primary outcome will be length of stay (LOS) in the emergency department (ED) stay for minor procedures. Secondarily the investigators will compare patient/family and provider satisfaction while using either intranasal midazolam or N2O for minimal sedation. The investigators hypothesize that the total length of stay for children undergoing minor procedures in the ED will be lower for N2O, as compared to intranasal midazolam. The investigators also hypothesize that patient/family and provider satisfaction will be higher with N2O and adverse effects will not differ between N2O and intranasal midazolam. Patients will receive either intranasal midazolam or N2O for minor procedures. Following the enrollment period, data will be analyzed and the two will be compared. Total length of stay, patient/family and provider satisfaction will be studied.
This project is an observational trial investigating wound cosmetic appearance after repair of traumatic skin lacerations in the head area of pediatric patients with two different approaches to skin closure: sutures versus tissue adhesive. Photographs will be taken at two follow-up visits after repair and later assessed by external blinded plastic surgeon using standard cosmetic assessment scales. The investigators hypothesize that cosmetic wound outcome will be equivalent in these two wound repair treatment options.