Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03280628
Other study ID # 171108
Secondary ID
Status Terminated
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date September 23, 2017
Est. completion date February 1, 2021

Study information

Verified date September 2022
Source Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

There are several methods of closing a skin cut: stitches, skin glue, and medical tape. Stitches have been used for a long time to close skin cuts. Skin glue (invented in the 1970s) and medical tape (invented in the 1960s) are two newer methods to close skin cuts. The purpose of this study is to find out which method (stitches, skin glue, or medical tape) of closing skin cuts results in the least amount of scarring. Other things the investigators will be looking at are which method is the cheapest, which causes the least pain, which requires the least amount of sedation, and which method patients and parents like the best.


Description:

When a child comes in to the Emergency Room with a skin cut, if the child and their parents consent to being in the study, they will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: stitches, skin glue, or medical tape. There will be about 30 kids in each group, and thus a goal of 90 kids total in the study. In the Emergency Room, a lidocaine ointment will be placed on the child's cut to decrease pain. The cut will be cleaned out with sterile saline. Then, depending on which method is used, the cut will be closed with either stitches, skin glue, or medical tape by their doctor. The participants will be asked to answer a short questionnaire. Finally, they will be given discharge instructions and sent home. At 3 months, the investigators will call parents for a quick questionnaire over the phone and parents will be asked to take a picture of the patient's scar and send it to the study staff. Once all 90 pictures have been collected, two Plastic Surgeons will be asked to rate the scars in terms of how they look. The Plastic Surgeons will not know which method was used to close which cut. Once all of the scars have been rated, the averages of scars will be compared for each closure method. The investigators will also look at how much each method cost, how much extra pain medications or sedation each group used, and which method was liked best.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Terminated
Enrollment 55
Est. completion date February 1, 2021
Est. primary completion date February 1, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group N/A to 18 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Medical complaint of laceration - Single, linear laceration - Laceration less than 5 cm in length and 0.5 cm in width - Laceration less than 12 hours old - Laceration minimally contaminated (no visible dirt in wound) - Parents and child speak English Exclusion Criteria: - Significant medical history that may impact wound healing (hematologic or oncologic diagnosis requiring chemotherapy, ichthyosis, epidermolysis bullosa, etc.) - Use of oral steroids (more than 5 days in the past month) - History of keloid formation - Allergy to skin glue, medical tape, or topical anesthetics - Lacerations requiring deep sutures - Lacerations caused by animal bites or scratches - Lacerations located on the scalp, eyebrow, eyelid, lip, mucosa, joint or nail bed - No access to photographic capabilities (camera or smartphone) and/or e-mail, OR unable to return to the Vanderbilt Children's Hospital Emergency Room to have a picture taken at 3 months

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Absorbable Sutures
The patient's doctor will close the patient's laceration with absorbable sutures.
Steri-Strips
The patient's doctor will close the patient's laceration with Steri-Strips.
Dermabond
The patient's doctor will close the patient's laceration with Dermabond.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Vanderbilt Children's Hospital Nashville Tennessee

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Cosmetic Outcome of Scar at 3 Months Two blinded Plastic Surgeons will rate the cosmetic outcome of the laceration using a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale with a score of 0 corresponding to "worst scar" and a score of 100 corresponding to "best scar" 3 months
Secondary Pain Experienced by Patient as Reported by Parent Parents will each be asked to score how much pain they felt the patient experienced using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale with a score of 0 corresponding to "No pain" and a score of 100 corresponding to "Terrible pain." Baseline
Secondary Satisfaction With Time in the Emergency Department Parents will report their satisfaction with Emergency Department length of stay using a 100-point visual analog scale with "100" meaning completely satisfied and "0" meaning not at all satisfied Baseline to wound closure, up to 30 minutes
Secondary Likelihood That Parent Would Recommend Laceration Closure Method Parents will be asked to rate how likely they would be to recommend the closure method used for their child using a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale with a score of 0 corresponding to "Extremely unlikely" and a score of 100 corresponding to "Extremely likely" Post-wound closure, approximately 30 minutes
Secondary Number of Complications of the Wound Site Parents will be asked by phone at 3 months if there were any complications with their child's cut (infection, opening of the wound, etc.). Investigators will count the number of complications reported. 3 months
Secondary Parental Reported Satisfaction With the Cosmetic Appearance of the Scar Parents will rate the cosmetic outcome of the laceration using a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale with a score of 0 corresponding to "worst scar" and a score of 100 corresponding to "best scar". 3 months
Secondary Presence of Train Tracks at the Scar Site Plastic Surgeons will record if a scar appears to have "train tracks" (or small dots on either side of a scar, all along the scar, usually caused by stitches) as they are rating each photo of the scar at 3 months post-closure. Surgeons will answer "yes" or "no". 3 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT00451724 - Intranasal Ketamine for Procedural Sedation in Pediatric Laceration Repair Phase 2
Completed NCT05240248 - Optilene® Suture Material for Dermal Sutures
Completed NCT02882256 - Video Discharge Instructions (VDI) as Adjuncts to Written Discharge Instructions in the Emergency Department N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02168439 - Intranasal Dexmedetomidine vs Intranasal Midazolam as Anxiolysis Prior to Pediatric Laceration Repair Phase 4
Completed NCT03199456 - A Randomized Post-market Study to Evaluate Zip Device Compared to Sutures for Laceration Repair in Pediatrics and Adults N/A
Completed NCT03080467 - Long-Term Outcome of Pediatric Traumatic Wound Repair: Suture Versus Tissue Adhesive
Recruiting NCT05225714 - Dermal Wound Closure Using Silkam®
Active, not recruiting NCT01911351 - Nitrous Oxide Use in Minor Procedures N/A
Suspended NCT01268670 - The Addition of Oral Analgesics to LET During Laceration Repair N/A
Recruiting NCT04557761 - Comparison of microMend® Devices to Sutures in Closing Lacerations in Children N/A
Completed NCT05812352 - Supporting Laypeople Addressing Prehospital Hemorrhage Study N/A
Completed NCT00834730 - Comparison of N2O Inhalation and Ketamine in Pediatric PSA Phase 4
Completed NCT03053947 - Pain Free Laceration Repairs Using Intra-nasal Ketamine Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03681717 - Virtual Reality vs. Standard-of-Care for Comfort During Laceration Repair N/A
Completed NCT03071601 - Prospective Evaluation of Topical Analgesia for Laceration Repair in the Emergency Department Phase 4
Completed NCT06370910 - Comparison Low-Level Laser Therapy With Cryotherapy in Parturients With Laceration and/or Episiotomy on Pain Reduction N/A
Completed NCT05148390 - Study to Examine Clinical Performance and Safety of Cutimed® Gelling Fiber in Routine Clinical Practice
Not yet recruiting NCT06217081 - 3M™ Topical Tissue Adhesive Versus Commercially Available Tissue Adhesive for the Closure of Lacerations and Incisions N/A
Withdrawn NCT03499002 - Teaching Medical Students How to Suture: Standard Simulation vs in Situ N/A