Laceration of Skin Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Post-Market Study of BandGrip in Traumatic Wound Closure Compared to Suture
an unbalanced (2:1) randomized study comparing two methods of traumatic skin closure in an ER setting: BandGrip vs suture
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 45 |
Est. completion date | February 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Male/Female age 18-65. - Subject presents to emergency room with at least one skin laceration that is assessed as requiring a suture closure on the trunk or extremities (excluding hands and feet). - The length of the laceration is less than or equal to 1.5 inches. - Subject is otherwise in good general health in the opinion of the investigator. - Subject must be willing to follow instructions for wound care provided by investigator and refrain from picking at the treatment device, applying topical medications to the wound, and swimming or soaking in a tub until BandGrip or the sutures are removed. - Subject agrees to return for follow-up evaluations. - Subject (or guardian) is able to comprehend and give informed consent for participation in this study. Exclusion Criteria: - Significant multiple trauma (merely multiple wounds are allowed). - The wound involves a lower limb with critical limb ischemia. - Concurrent acute infection requiring intravenous or oral antibiotics. - Bleeding, coagulation and or clotting disorders. - Subject is on dialysis. - Inflammatory and or allergic diseases or conditions of the skin: for example, psoriasis, eczema or dermatitis. - History of drug abuse. - Chronic use of oral steroids or immunosuppressants. - Known personal or family history of keloid or hypertrophic scarring. - History of abnormal wound healing. - Burst stellate lacerations due to a crush or hard blow. - Animal or human bite or scratch. - Wound is in the head, hands or feet or in a high skin tension area or across an area of increased skin tension on a joint. - Investigator objects to a patient's involvement in the study protocol. - Known allergy to components to BandGrip or suture material. - Known cognitive or psychiatric disorder. - Wound requiring debridement of devitalized or contaminated tissue. - Wound at site of active rash/skin lesion making evaluation difficult. - Previously treated wound or has failed to heal. - Puncture wound. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | University of Irvine | Irvine | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
BandGrip |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Complete wound closure | defined as continuous approximation of skin margins without need for reintervention . | 30 days post treatment | |
Secondary | Wound comesis | a 100mm visual analog scale (with 100 representing complete satisfaction with comesis) assessing wound cosmesis using the Comesis Visual Analog Scale. | 10 and 30 days post closure | |
Secondary | Pain/discomfort | The subject will complete a 100mm visual analog scale with 100 representing worst pain level. | index procedure and 10 days post closure | |
Secondary | Infection | incidence of clinical infection requiring antibiotic treatment. | 10 and 30 days post closure | |
Secondary | Subject satisfaction | subjects will complete a 100mm VAS (with 100 representing complete satisfaction) to evaluate their overall assessment of their scar, | 30 days post closure | |
Secondary | Physician satisfaction | a 100mm VAS ( with 100mm representing complete satisfaction) to evaluate the overall ease of wound closure. | index procedure | |
Secondary | Time to wound closure and device removal | Time to closure and removal of closure device | index procedure and 10 days post wound closure | |
Secondary | Subject Satisfaction | indication of subject preference for method of sound closure | 30 days post closure | |
Secondary | Wound Evaluation | assessment of the quality of wound healing by the physician. | 10 and 30 days post wound closure |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Terminated |
NCT03528512 -
IN Ketamine vs IN Midazolam and Fentanyl for Laceration Repair
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT06274073 -
Double-dorsal Versus Single-volar Digital Block
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05934669 -
IN Midazolam vs IN Dexmedetomidine vs IN Ketamine During Minimal Procedures in Pediatric ED
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04122859 -
Evaluation of Zip Device to Conventional Sutures for Laceration Repair in Pediatrics in an Emergency Department
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04091672 -
RECELL® System Combined With Meshed Autograft for Reduction of Donor Skin Harvesting in Soft Tissue Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04617041 -
Assessment of DAFILON® Suture Material for Skin Closure
|
||
Completed |
NCT04536493 -
Comparison of 2 Application Techniques for LET Gel Used Prior to Simple Laceration Repair
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05383495 -
Anxiolysis for Laceration Repair in Children
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03475901 -
Virtual Reality for Anxiolysis During Laceration Repair in the Pediatric Emergency Room
|
N/A |