Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04177888
Other study ID # E-19-4027
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date August 1, 2018
Est. completion date October 30, 2019

Study information

Verified date November 2019
Source King Saud University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The study aimed at determining the effect of hot pack on labor pain reduction and the duration of labor in comparison with routine care. Further, the study also aimed at determining the women's satisfaction with the use of hot pack and with routine care

with hypotheses: H1: Primigravid women who received hot pack in the active phase of labor will have a significantly lower mean labor pain score than those who received routine care.

H2: Primigravid women who received hot pack in the active phase of labor will have significantly shorter mean labor duration than those who received routine care.


Description:

Childbirth pain is the severest type of pain that women experience in their life. Therefore, effective management of labor pain is essential. There are various methods to control childbirth pain: pharmacological and non-pharmacological such as Entonox and heat therapy respectively. In most Saudi Arabian hospitals, Entonox is used as routine care, while non- pharmacological agents are rarely used. Various forms of heat therapy are effective in labor pain reduction and shortening the duration of labor. There is a dearth for studies that compare the effectiveness of the hot pack with routine care that includes use of Entonox.

Objectives

- To determine the effect of the hot pack on labor pain reduction among primigravid women.

- To determine the effect of the hot pack on the duration of labor among primigravid women.

- To determine the satisfaction of primigravid women regarding hot pack and routine care.

Methods The study was conducted in Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region, with randomized sample of 91 primigravidae with normal pregnancy in active phase of first stage of labor, with cervical dilatation of 6 - 8 cm. This randomized controlled trial consisted of two groups: the experimental group (n = 45) who received hot pack. The control group (n = 46) received routine care including Entonox. Labor pain was assessed by Visual Analogue Scale for pain intensity (VAS); duration of labor was measured by the WHO modified partograph, and women's satisfaction was assessed using a satisfaction scale. Following eligibility assessment, participants were selected and allocated to the groups randomly. After obtaining the written informed consent, the initial assessment was done; the experimental group received hot pack, and the control group received routine care until delivery. The baseline pain score was assessed before the intervention and every 30 minutes after the intervention until delivery. The duration of labor was assessed using the WHO Partograph. The women reported satisfaction two hours post-delivery using the satisfaction scale.

Results:

Before the intervention, the experimental and control group did not differ statistically in terms of labor pain score (p = .820). Post-intervention, the labor pain score was significantly lower in the experimental groups (p ≤ 0.05) compared to the control group at 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 210 minutes. The duration of the first, second, and third stages of labor was not significantly different among both groups (p ≥ 0.05). The overall mean satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the experimental group compared to the control group (p ≤ 0.05), the mean scores of two items, one on happiness with the care received, and the other with the delivery experience were not significantly different between both groups (p ≥ 0.05).

Conclusion:

Heat therapy, such as the hot pack is a non-pharmacological method for labor pain management. Heat therapy is effective in reducing labor pain. Although it has been not effective in shortening the duration of labor, women are satisfied with the use of hot pack. This finding could be useful in formulating policies regarding implementation of the non-pharmacological methods for labor pain management. It is essential to educate healthcare professionals regarding the benefits of heat therapy even before implementing a change.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 91
Est. completion date October 30, 2019
Est. primary completion date July 25, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years to 40 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

Saudi primigravid women who:

- Have normal term pregnancy (37 to 42 weeks) and have normal onset of labor.

- Are in the active phase of the first phase of labor with cervical dilatation of 6 cm and above and admitted to labor and delivery unit at Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region (AFHSR).

- Agreed to receive routine care including Entonox inhalation or to hot pack as pain management method during labor.

Exclusion Criteria:

Saudi primigravid women who:

- Are with contraindications for hot packs (fever, area injury or inflammation, skin infection, eczema, bleeding, Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT), edema and poor thermal regulation),

- Have complicated pregnancy (polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios, decreased fetal movement, Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR), Intrauterine Fetal Death (IUFD), Ante Partum Hemorrhage (APH), history of infertility, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, placenta previa, and placental abruption).

- Have medical conditions such as asthma, pneumonia, chest infection, chronic disease; such as cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and diabetes.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Hot Pack
It is a single-use pack filled with magnesium sulfate and water, which was squeezed between the hands to activate their warming effect. The temperature ranges between 40°C to 50°C, which is safe to use. Thus, it provided a consistent heat therapy for up to 30 minutes. They can be used directly on the skin or covered with gauze to avoid direct skin contact. Applied to the lower back area for 30 minutes, followed by 10 minutes rest between each hot pack application, then it was reapplied for another 30 minutes. This procedure was repeated till delivery.

Locations

Country Name City State
Saudi Arabia KSU Riyadh

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
King Saud University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Saudi Arabia, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Partograph The partograph is a universal tool to assess the progress of labor, it included graphical information with three main components; fetal condition, the progress of labor, and maternal condition. The researcher used the progress of labor component in the partograph to calculate the duration of labor in minutes. 1-8 hours during labor
Primary Satisfaction Scale A Likert-type scale with five points. The scale descriptions: (5) very satisfied, (4) satisfied, (3) neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, (2) dissatisfied, and (1) very dissatisfied Used two hours post delivery for both group to assess women's satisfaction regarding the intervention and routine care
Primary Visual Analogue Scale for Pain Intensity (VAS) "change" is being assessed It is a one item scale that involves a horizontal or vertical line which starts either with 0 to 10 cm. Zero is no pain and 10 is the worst or intolerable pain. the interpretation is zero no pain, 1 - 3 cm mild pain, 4 - 6 cm moderate pain, 7 - 9 cm severe pain, and 10 cm intolerable or worst pain possible.
baseline labor pain assessed, then VAS used every 30 minutes to assess labor pain till delivery
1-8 hours during labor
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03539562 - Therapeutic Rest to Delay Admission in Early Labor: A Prospective Study on Morphine Sleep
Withdrawn NCT04662450 - Evaluation and Management of Parturients' Pain Intensity N/A
Completed NCT02885350 - Spinal or Epidural Fentanyl or Sufentanil for Labour Pain in Early Phase of the Labour Phase 4
Completed NCT02550262 - Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Labor Analgesia During First Stage of Labor N/A
Completed NCT01598506 - Intrathecal Hydromorphone for Labor Analgesia Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT01636999 - Comparing Sedara to Butorphanol in Early Labor N/A
Completed NCT00987441 - Epidural Labor Analgesia and Infant Neurobehavior N/A
Completed NCT00755092 - Effect of Doula in Nulliparas and Multiparas N/A
Terminated NCT00787176 - The Association Between Fluid Administration, Oxytocin Administration, and Fetal Heart Rate Changes N/A
Recruiting NCT06036797 - Efficacy and Safety of Hydromorphone-ropivacaine Versus Sufentanil-ropivacaine for Epidural Labor Analgesia Phase 2
Completed NCT05512065 - Changes in Velocimetric Indices of Uterine and Umbilical Arteries Before and After Combined Spinal-epidural Analgesia in Laboring Women N/A
Completed NCT05327088 - Epidural Dexmedetomidine vs Nalbuphine for Labor Analgesia Phase 2
Completed NCT03103100 - Comparing Bupivacaine, Lidocaine, and a Combination of Bupivacaine and Lidocaine for Labor Epidural Activation Phase 3
Recruiting NCT03623256 - Comparison of Intrathecal Versus Epidural Fentanyl on Fetal Bradycardia in Labor Combined Spinal Epidural Analgesia Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT02271100 - Assessment of the Use of Ultrasound for Epidural Catheter Placement and Comparison With Palpation Technique N/A
Completed NCT02926469 - Virtual Reality Analgesia in Labor: The VRAIL Pilot Study N/A
Completed NCT03712735 - Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus For Laboring Obstetrical Women Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT05565274 - Outcome of Combined Tramadol and Paracetamol Versus Pentazocine as Labour Analgesia Among Parturients N/A
Recruiting NCT01708668 - The Effects of Intermittent Epidural Bolus on Fever During Labor Analgesia N/A
Recruiting NCT02575677 - Oxycodone in Treatment of Early Labour Pain Efficacy and Safety