Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Effect of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Decision Aid Tailored for People With Lower Educational Attainment in the Central Denmark Region on Colorectal Cancer Knowledge and Colorectal Cancer Screening Attitude and Participation Rate
The aim of the trial is to test the effect of a web-based decision aid (DA) on colorectal
cancer (CRC) knowledge, decisional conflict, participation rate, and informed choice
(evaluated based on knowledge, attitudes and actual participation).
The study includes three study arms. Citizens to be recruited are identified from the Danish
Civil Registration System based on residence (Central Denmark Region), age (50-74 years old),
and month of birth. A random sample of 15,000 citizens born in December (invited for CRC
screening through October/November/December 2017) (study arm 1+2) and 5,000 citizens born in
October (invited for CRC screening in January/February 2017) (study arm 3) is identified.
Citizens in study arm 1+2 will receive a baseline questionnaire assessing knowledge,
attitudes, worry, and health literacy. Non respondents will receive one reminder after two
weeks and after four weeks non-respondents will receive a phone call, offering them to fill
out the questionnaire via the phone. Baseline questionnaire respondents are included in the
study, and will be randomized into two study arms (intervention group and control group).
Citizens in the intervention group will be identified in the screening IT system. Date of
screening invitation and screening reminder (citizens who do not return a stool sample within
45 days of the screening invitation) is retrieved. Citizens receiving a screening reminder
will receive a link for the DA. Follow-up questionnaire will be sent to all included citizens
in study-arm 1+2 three months after the last screening invitation has been sent out. Citizens
have six weeks to respond to the questionnaire.
Study arm 3 is a historic cohort. The citizens receive only one questionnaire at the same
time as the baseline questionnaires are sent out to the intervention and control groups. The
citizens are included if they respond to the questionnaire within six weeks. Questionnaire
reminders are sent out at two and four weeks.
Data on screening invitation date, screening reminder date, returning a stool sample and
result will be retrieved from the screening IT system for all included citizens (Study arm
1-3). Lastly, data from Statistics Denmark (on socio-demographic and socio-economic factors)
will be included.
Study setting The Danish national colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme was implemented
in Denmark in March 2014. All citizens aged 50-74 years are invited to take up CRC screening
biennially, however, the first prevalence round is carried out during a four year period
(2014-2017). During the this period, citizens are invited according to month of birth, except
citizens aged 49 who are invited just before they turn 50 and citizens turning 75 who are
invited prior to their 75th birthday, if they were not invited earlier in the program.
Politically and organisationally the CRC screening programme is nationally directed, but the
administrative responsibility is placed within the five regions in Denmark. The Department of
Public Health Programmes is responsible for the administration of the CRC screening programme
in the Central Denmark Region (CDR).
The CDR has 1.3 million citizens (23% of the total population) of which roughly 390 000
citizens are 50-74 years of age. The citizens receive an invitation, containing a screening
kit. The screening test (collection of a stool sample) is performed in the citizen's own
home. The stool sample is sent to the clinical biochemical department at the hospital. If the
citizens do not return a stool sample within 45 days after receiving the invitation, a
screening reminder is received. Citizens, who still do not return a stool sample, are
automatically referred to the next screening round, and will receive another invitation two
years later. Citizens with a negative test are automatically referred to the next screening
round. Citizens with a positive test are invited to have a colonoscopy.
Since 2010, national digitisation has occurred in Denmark. Hence, communication to and from
Danish authorities occur via digital mail, in the public email platform E-Boks. Danish
residents are obliged to order a digital signature (NemID) which is used as a shared log-in
for E-boks, public and private online self-services, and online banking. Only disabled
citizens (e.g. physical or cognitive impairment) or citizens unable to satisfactorily
identify themselves (e.g. migrants with no permanent resident permit) can be exempted from
ordering a NemID. As of May 2016 more than 5 million Danish citizens (87.5% of the entire
population including children) have access to E-boks. Exemption from digital communication
has been granted to 9.8% of Danish Residents aged 45-74 years.
All letters in the CRC screening programme are sent by digital mail, except from invitation
letters, which contains a screening kit and are sent by conventional mail. Citizens exempt
from digital communication receive conventional letters via a remote printing system.
All invitations and reminders in the screening program are sent out based on lists generated
in the administrative CRC screening program IT system, which is linked to the daily updated
Danish Civil Registration System, in which all Danish citizens are registered with unique
civil registration numbers (CRN) assigned at birth or at immigration. The department of
public health programmes is administratively responsible for the screening program IT system.
Study flow The study population will be identified based on data extraction from the Danish
Civil Registration System. 10 000 citizens 50-74 years old, living in the Central Denmark
Region born in December (invited for CRC screening through October/November/December 2017)
and 5 000 citizens 50-74 years old, living in the Central Denmark Region born in October
(invited for CRC screening in January/February 2017) are identified.
The 10 000 citizens born in December comprise the population to be randomized (study arm 1
and 2). This group of citizens will receive a baseline questionnaire at the beginning of the
study period (before receiving screening invitations). Non-respondents receive a
questionnaire reminder after two weeks. After four weeks a telephone call is made offering
filling out the questionnaire via telephone. Respondents (at six weeks after receiving the
questionnaire) are included in the study and randomized into two groups (intervention and
control group). All included citizens are monitored in the screening program IT system, in
order to identify date of screening invitation and date of screening reminder. Citizens in
study arm one (intervention group) receive a decision aid (DA) on the same day as the
screening reminder or the next day. Both groups receive a follow-up questionnaire three
months after the date of invitation for the last citizen invited in the study population.
Questionnaire reminders are sent out at two and four weeks, and deadline for questionnaire
response will be after six weeks.
The 5 000 citizens born in October comprise a historic cohort of citizens invited to CRC
screening. This population receives only one questionnaire 3-4 months after they received
their screening invitations. In this survey reminders will be sent out at two and four weeks.
Respondents (at six weeks) will be included in the study.
All contact with the study participants in this study will occur via digital communication or
by postal mail via remote printing system. Hence all questionnaires, survey reminders, and
DAs will be sent out first via digital mail. However, it is crucial to reach a high
questionnaire participation rate in order to obtain generalizable results. The aim is to
reach a survey participation rate of no less than 50% for baseline and 80% for follow-up.
When questionnaire data has been collected, date of screening invitation and screening
reminder will be collected from the screening program IT system along with the date of test
registration laboratory and the test result.
Questionnaire data and IT system data are both uploaded to Statistics Denmark, where
socio-demographic data are appended for the data management and data analysis.
Materials Three different questionnaires will be administered in this trial: The baseline
questionnaire, the follow-up questionnaire, and the questionnaire for the historic cohort.
The questionnaires comprise five different scales. The worry scale, the knowledge scale, the
attitudes scale, the decisional conflict scale, and the health literacy scale, developed by
the European Union consortium (HLS-EU-Q16).
The DA is an online tool. The web-based design opens up possibilities to feature more
advanced functions, e.g. questions for the participant during the process, and a summary of
answers at the end. Further a web-based design has lower running costs, and can be provided
as a link via the E-boks platform. The development of the DA took place in five steps: (1)
scoping of the DA; (2) formation of the steering group (the research group); (3) Design
phase, in which the prototype was developed based on previous research by the research group;
(4) Alpha testing, including citizens and experts evaluating design and usability and a peer
review by experts and citizens, evaluating content and usability; (5) Beta testing, including
citizens, evaluating feasibility, comprehensibility and usability.
The development took place as an iterative process, in which the DA was revise between each
step based on the experiences gained from the previous step.
Background data on educational level, family income, occupation, marital status, and
ethnicity will be obtained from Statistics Denmark when questionnaire data have been
collected.
Statistical methods All statistical analyses are going to be carried out in Stata/SE 14
(STATACorp LP, College Station, Texas, USA), stratifying according to gender. All estimates
will be presented with 95% confidence intervals, and all analyses will be carried out on a 5%
significance level. Since citizens with lower educational attainment (LEA) are the target
group of this study, all citizens with medium or higher educational attainment will be
excluded from the statistical analyses.
Pearson's chi-square test will be used to test differences in demographic characteristic
distribution between respondents and non-respondents as well as between the study arms in
order to test whether the randomisation succeeds.
Differences in distributions of responses to the outcomes (informed choice, yes/no; Adequate
knowledge, yes/no; mean level of decisional conflict; mean level of decisional support; mean
level of effectiveness of decision made; mean level of worries; and participation, yes/no) in
the study arms are being analysed using the independent sample t test for continuous
variables and Pearson's chi-square test for categorical variables. Further, the relative risk
(RR) will be estimated for all dichotomous outcomes using a 2x2 table with study arm 2 and
historic study arm as the reference, respectively.
If randomisation does not succeed in producing groups with similar baseline characteristics,
a logistic regression will be completed for categorical outcomes and a linear regression for
continuous outcomes in order to estimate an adjusted odds ratio (OR) as a value to be
interpreted as a RR.
All analyses will be conducted as intention to treat (ITT) analyses, in which all LEA
citizens will remain in the study arms to which they were first assigned.
Power calculations Every month 9 900 citizens are invited to participate in CRC screening in
the CDR. On average, 47% of these (4 600) do not return a stool sample within 45 days, and
they receive a screening reminder. It is expected that at least 1 200 (26% of the population,
according to Statistics Denmark) have LEA. Power calculations (considering a 5% significance
level and an 80% statistical power) based on being able to detect expected differences of the
outcomes of 22% (proportion making an informed choice), 14% (proportion having a positive
attitude towards CRC screening), 16% (proportion participating in CRC screening) and 2.4
(difference in mean score of knowledge) between the groups (as observed in previous studies)
indicate that 200 citizens with LEA needs to be included in every group thereby a total of
770 citizens who receive a screening reminder. Analyses are stratified by gender; therefore
the study population is doubled to 1 540 participants in every group, so that adequate power
is retained to assess the effect of the DA in both genders.
With an expected participation rate of 58% for baseline questionnaire (study arm 1+2) and an
expected participation rate of 80% in the follow-up questionnaire in study arms 1 and 2, 10
000 citizens who will be invited for screening (5 000 in each study arm and hence an
allocation ratio of 1:1) are included. In the historic study arm a 50% participation rate is
expected (two written reminders, no telephone calls), hence we 5 000 citizens, who will be
invited for screening, are included.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04531761 -
Evaluating the Efficacy of the Parent Support Program
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05623202 -
Pilot Study of Capacity-oriented Intervention to Promote Food Security and Diet Quality Among Hispanics/Latinos
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03740269 -
Oral Health Educational Program for Knowledge,Attitude,Practice of Oral Health Among Agroup of Egyptian School Girls
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05626231 -
Development of a Training Intervention to Improve Mental Health Treatment for Gender Minority Youth
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05297721 -
Nurses' Level of Knowledge on Skin Tears: A Cross-Sectional Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT04096196 -
A Game-based Educational Approach to Promote Child Safety Knowledge and Behaviours
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05454618 -
The Decision To Enroll In Therapeutic Clinical Trials In A Pediatric Cancer Clinical Network
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05036057 -
Turkish Version of the Individual Knowledge Statement Questionnaire of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06100198 -
The Effect of Nutrition and Exercise Program on the Health of Community-dwelling Older Adults
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03287622 -
Evaluation of an Interactive Opioid Risk Education Program (STOMP) for Parents
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05073562 -
Nutrition Intervention to Address Anemia Among Adolescent Girls in Liberia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03673267 -
Nutricity: A Pilot Study to Improve Parental Nutrition Literacy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05244161 -
A Quasi-experimental Evaluation of the Malezi Program in Tanzania
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06441981 -
Public Perception and Policy for SARS-CoV-2 Whole Genome Sequencing and Genomics for All
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04888416 -
Implementing Outcome Measures in Stroke Rehabilitation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03710837 -
The Effect of Pain Education on Multidisciplinary Healthcare Students' Understanding of Chronic Pain
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04128241 -
Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices on Fad Diets of a Panel of Spanish Consumers: Protocol of a Cross-sectional Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT04656522 -
Comic Intervention for Sexual Violence Prevention and Post-rape Care
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04184219 -
Determinants of Knowledge About and Use of Dietary Supplements
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04182282 -
Online Training & Certification for Competency in Dementia Friendly Hospital Care
|
N/A |