View clinical trials related to Kidney Transplantation.
Filter by:After a kidney transplant, patients take drugs called anti-rejection drugs (immunosuppressives) to prevent their bodies from rejecting the new kidney. At present it is not possible to have a successful transplant without these drugs. These drugs make it possible for a person who receives the transplant to accept the "foreign" kidney. Most patients who get a transplant need to take anti-rejection medications for the rest of their lives, or for as long as the kidney continues to work. Researchers are looking to learn whether abatacept is as good as belatacept in preventing rejection, whether there are other benefits or harms associated with abatacept treatment, and possibly allows greater flexibility on patient's travel and time since abatacept is self-administered at home. This study is being done to answer these questions: Are weekly abatacept injections under the skin a safe and effective substitute for monthly belatacept intravenous (IV) infusions? and How well does the kidney function after switching from belatacept to abatacept?
The iParent2Parent (iP2P) program is a new, innovative virtual mentorship program that will connect parents one-to-one with other parents of pediatric kidney transplant recipients who are trained to offer vital peer support and mentorship. Parents of children who received a kidney transplant at The Hospital for Sick Children will be invited to participate as mentors and mentees (randomized into the iP2P or control group). The iP2P program can decrease feelings of isolation, improve mental health and have a long-term positive impact on patient health. This research will increase our understanding of one-to-one peer support and leverage eHealth technologies to improve the access to and acceptability of parent peer support interventions.
The study aims to determine the short-term efficacy, mechanisms and safety of 12 weeks of dapagliflozin and semaglutide combination therapy in 20 KTR, with and without T2D.
The aim of this pilot prospective interventional study is to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) in allowing obese subjects (≥35 kg/m2) with end stage renal disease who need of kidney transplantation to reduce their BMI below 35 in order to be inserted in the waiting list BMI. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: Is the procedure effective in reducing BMI to the target level in 12 months? Which is the effect on weight loss, quality of life and obesity-related comorbidities? Participants will undergo ESG as per standard clinical practice and followed up to 12 months before transplantation and for 12 months after transplantation.
800 adult first time kidney transplant recipients will be enrolled in the Observational Study and followed to evaluate their Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-DR/DQ molecular mismatch (mMM) score as a risk-stratifying prognostic biomarker. Six months after transplant the study will identify those who meet the eligibility criteria for the Nested Randomized Control Trial (RCT). 300 eligible subjects will be randomized 2:1 to abatacept or Standard of care (SOC) in the randomization and followed for 18 months monitoring for safety and improvement in renal function, neurocognitive function, and a life participation patient reported outcome measure (PROM). The primary objective of the Observational Study is to test the validity of the HLA-DR/DQ mMM score as a prognostic biomarker for stratification of post-transplant alloimmune risk. Whereas the objective of the Nested RCT is to test whether a superior outcome in kidney function (primary endpoint), as well as secondary endpoints (neurocognitive function, and life participation PROM), will be achieved in patients who are transitioned from Tacrolimus (TAC) to abatacept, while maintaining efficacy (freedom from biopsy proven acute rejection).
Renal transplantation is the best choice for the treatment of end-stage renal disease, but the long-term survival of the graft is still remains a challenge. Chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is the main factor affecting the long-term survival of the graft. There is still no effective treatment for chronic antibody-mediated rejection, even in the active phase (CaAMR). In recent years, new therapeutic drugs based on the generation of DSA and the mechanism of AMR, including protease inhibitor bortezomi, CD20 monoclonal antibody, C5 monoclonal antibody and IL-6 antibody, have not been able to effectively eliminate and inhibit the generation of DSA, nor have they been proved to have a definite effect on AMR. CD38 is a type II transmembrane protein that is highly expressed on plasma cells and NK cells, which are considered to play a key role in the occurrence and development of AMR. Recently, a few cases have reported that CD38 monoclonal antibody combined plasma exchange and/or IVIG may be an effective strategy for the prevention and treatment of AMR, but the effectiveness and safety of daratumumab monotherapy on CaAMR were unknown. This is a multicenter, prospective, single arm clinical study. The study will enroll 15 renal transplant recipients with positive DSA and CaAMR confirmed by biopsy after renal transplantation. According to inclusion and exclusion criteria patients will be screened to participate in the trial.
This study will examine the safety and effectiveness of a bone marrow transplant after kidney transplant (from either a living or deceased donor). An investigational medication and other treatments will be given prior to and after the transplant to help protect the transplanted kidney from being attacked by the body's immune system
The smartNTx trial: Prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate additional interventional telemedical management versus standard aftercare in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). STUDY PURPOSE: To demonstrate that additional interventional telemedical management will lead to a higher chance for long-term graft survival, increase adherence, quality of life (QoL), and reduce complications and healthcare costs after kidney transplantation.
1. Construct a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of tacrolimus in kidney transplant patients, and explore the quantitative relationship between combination drugs and gene polymorphisms on the safety and efficacy of tacrolimus in kidney transplant patients; 2. Based on the established pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of tacrolimus population in kidney transplant patients, combined with combined drugs, gene polymorphisms and other factors for simulation, predict the steady-state trough concentration and efficacy of tacrolimus in kidney transplant patients taking triple drugs (tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenol sodium enteric-coated tablets, glucocorticoids), and apply the model to the real world to explore the optimal initial dose and maintenance therapeutic dose of tacrolimus, so as to achieve individualized and precise treatment and guide the rational clinical use of drugs. 3. Clarify the value of precision medicine guided by population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics models in clinical practice.
Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) suffer from immunosuppression-related adverse events (iRAEs), such as infections and malignancy from chronic immunosuppression exposure but are also at risk of graft loss from rejection with under-immunosuppression. Biomarkers that predict both iRAEs and rejection and allow individualisation of immunosuppression exposure are lacking. While plasma viral DNA levels of Torque Teno Virus (TTV), a widely prevalent, non-pathogenic virus, have been shown to predict both iRAE and rejection in incident KTRs within 1 year after transplant, its role for prevalent KTRs on stable immunosuppression is unclear. The investigators hypothesise that plasma TTV levels can predict iRAEs and rejection in KTRs on stable immunosuppression and propose a pilot study to pursue three specific aims: (1) To determine the TTV levels and its relationship with clinical factors affecting the 'net state of immunosuppression' in prevalent KTRs. (2) To analyse the prognostic value of TTV levels for iRAEs and rejection in prevalent KTRs. (3) To compare the prognostic performance of TTV levels to commonly available biomarkers and composite prognostic scores. The investigators seek pursue these aims by performing a single-centre, prospective, observational cohort study of 172 KTRs on stable immunosuppression for more than 3 months. TTV levels will be measured, using the TTV R-GENE® kit, upon recruitment and when kidney allograft biopsies are performed. Subjects will be monitored for iRAEs and rejection for at least 12 months. The study will provide data on the distribution of TTV levels in a prevalent cohort of KTRs and analyse its relationship with clinical factors and important clinical outcomes. If the study indicates that TTV may be predictive of iRAEs and rejection, the investigators aim to conduct further studies including interventional studies using TTV levels to guide immunosuppression. Ultimately, the investigators aim to use TTV as a biomarker to optimise long-term immunosuppression exposure, reduce the risk of iRAEs without increase in rejection, and improve long-term outcomes for KTRs.