View clinical trials related to Kidney Transplantation.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) of FR104 as well as its potential clinical effect on acute rejection prophylaxis and renal function in a de novo renal transplant population receiving an allograft from standard criteria donors.
The use of polyclonal anti-T cell antibodies (ATG) has benefits in kidney transplantation, however, its use is associated mainly with hematological, infectious, and neoplastic complications. Monitoring T cells in patients receiving ATG was first proposed in 1975 to improve efficacy in preventing acute rejection and avoiding excessive immunosuppression. The dose regimen is guided by a daily count of TCD3+ lymphocytes. Monitoring the dose of thymoglobulin through its biological effects on T cells is a rational and safe method of titrating the dose of that antibody. This way, it is possible to reduce the total amount of drug administered to the patient and, consequently, reduce undesirable complications, as well as the cost of treatment, without losing effect on the benefit of immunosuppression. Currently, the usual cumulative dose of ATG for induction in kidney transplant patients is 6mg/kg, in divided doses. However, the ideal dose and duration of therapy are still the subject of studies, with protocols between centers varying from total doses of 3 to 6 mg/kg, either fractionated or single, to achieve the lowest dose with fewer undesirable effects, and with reduced length of inpatient stay. The use of ATG in a single dose of 3 mg/kg was successfully assessed for risks of infection and rejection in patients with low immunological risk. This study proposes evaluating the efficacy and safety of a single 3mg/kg dose of ATG for patients with low and standard immune risk, with TCD3+ lymphocyte monitoring, to assess the duration of the TCD3+ cells in the peripheral blood.
The aim of this study is to assess humoral immune response in kidney transplant recipients after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine.
Vaccination against SARS CoV-2 appears to be the best strategy today to control the COVID-19 pandemic. The first published studies with Pfizer, Moderna and Astra-Zeneca vaccines show very good vaccine protection in the general population and good short-term tolerance. The efficacy of these vaccines ranges from 62 to 95%, which is particularly remarkable, especially for mRNA vaccines. Nevertheless, these studies do not report the vaccine response in organ transplant patients. It is known that transplant patients have lower vaccine responses than immunocompetent patients due to some degree of immunosuppression. Therefore, the investigators are interested in evaluating the vaccine response of organ transplant recipients after vaccination against SARS- CoV-2. For non-responder patients, new strategies can be proposed: 3rd or 4th boost of vaccine or perfusion/injection of antiS monoclonal antibodies. These strategies must be evaluated.
Although the notions that kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease and that simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplant is the only treatment able to restore euglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes and selected patients with type 2 diabetes, are now consolidated, rates of transplantation remain low among potential candidates with high levels of preformed anti-HLA antibodies. Most of the data comes from the experience in kidney transplant but can be easily translated to pancreas transplant. Approximately 30% of patients on the transplant waiting list have evidence of sensitization in the form of alloantibodies, generated from exposure to previous transplants, blood transfusions, pregnancy, or other events. The presence of a panel-reactive antibody level of at least 80% (i.e. a high level of sensitization) creates difficulty in finding matched kidneys from compatible donors, leading to lower rates of transplantation in highly sensitized candidates compared to non-sensitized; the longer waiting times translates in an increased mortality rate. Despite the development of desensitization strategies and the advancement in immunosuppression protocols, it is apparent that transplanting these patients carries an increased risk of acute antibody mediated rejection; 25%-50% of transplants will have an early acute antibody mediated rejection . Most of these rejections can be successfully treated, but a high rate of transplant glomerulopathy and chronic antibody mediated rejection (AMR) leading to accelerated allograft failure is common.
The investigators hypothesise that the adaptation of CYP3A5 genotype-based Tacrolimus (FK) dosing will lead to earlier FK target achievement and consequently, better clinical outcome after kidney transplantation (RTx). This study aims to shed light on the possible impact of CYP3A genotype-based FK dosing on FK target achievement and clinical outcome after RTx in a multi-ethnic population where current evidence is lacking. This data would be helpful to the physicians so that by knowing the genotype of the patient before undergoing transplantation, practitioners would be able to decide on the starting dose of FK so as to avoid low trough levels and risk of acute rejection or high trough levels and risk of nephrotoxicity.
This is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, active control, non-inferiority study to assess the safety and efficacy of AT-1501 compared with tacrolimus in the incidence of BPAR events through 6 months post-transplant.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of TX200-TR101 and its effects on the donated kidney in living donor kidney transplant recipients. TX200-TR101 is a product made from a kidney transplant recipient's own immune cells, which are genetically modified and designed to help the transplant recipient's body accept their donated kidney and prevent their immune system from rejecting it.
The purpose of this study is to compare frequency of UTI, urine leak and need for reoperation in patients after renal transplant with early or delayed Foley catheter removal. The hypothesis of the ELUCATR trial is that there is no need to keep Foley catheter longer than 24 hours after kidney transplant due to lack of significant effect on urological complications (urine leak, ureter strictures). Early removal can also reduce urinary tract infections. Main advantage of urinary catheter placement is continual diuresis monitoring and lower bladder pressure. Some hypothesize that increased pressure can disrupt ureteroneocystostomy with resultant urinary fistula. Clinical practice is to remove the catheter between 1-10 post-transplant day. Only few studies described removal of Foley catheter in the first 48 hours. There is no level 1 evidence for timing of urinary catheter removal after kidney transplantation. Urinary tract infection is a common complication after KTx occurring in about 7-80% patients. Studies suggest direct negative effect of UTI on long-term renal allograft function. There are several independent risk factors for developing UTI: female sex, diabetes and obesity. Duration of catheterization is a modifiable risk factor. Urine leak and ureter stenosis are relatively frequent surgical complications of kidney transplantation. Urine leaks occur in 2-9% of all kidney transplants. Most of them happen within 3 months after surgery. Urinary fistula contributes to mortality and graft loss. Majority of them need intervention with nephrostomy, pigtail ureteral stent or surgery. Anastomotic or ureter stenosis occurs in 3.1% of all kidney transplants and is usually resolved with open ureteroneocystostomy. Diagnosed and treated early, it does not affect patient and graft survival. There are no solid data documenting influence of the urinary bladder catheterization on fistulas, urinomas, ureter strictures and need for reoperation in this set of patients. European Best Renal Practice Guidelines recommend removal of the catheter as early as possible, however a randomized trial on timing and adverse event rates (urinary tract infection, urinary leakage) is needed.
Frailty is common among chronic kidney disease patients who are on the kidney transplant (KT) waiting list. The aim of this study is to assess frailty according to different frailty tools among KT candidates and to establish potential biomarkers of frailty.