View clinical trials related to Kidney Transplantation.
Filter by:Solid Organ Transplantation (SOT) is made possible by the use of a lifelong immunosuppressive treatment. This treatment limits the response of the immune system, enabling long-term survival of the transplanted organ, but also leading to weaker anti-infectious responses. In this study, we will compare the response to a booster Hepatitis B vaccination (HBV) in SOT patients, either after kidney or liver transplantation. We will also compare the immune response depending on the immunosuppressive treatment. In order to provide a detailed picture of the immune response, we will investigate the usual serological response (anti-HBs antibodies), but also the cellular memory (both T and B) using ELISpot assays and flow-cytometry, over a 6 months period following booster vaccination.
Antibody mediated rejection (ABMR) is a major cause of graft loss after kidney transplantation (KT) and is mainly associated with preformed anti-HLA donor specific antibodies (DSAs) (phenotype 1) or de novo DSAs (dnDSAs) (phenotype 2). Preexisting DSA-associated ABMR have superior graft survival compared with dnDSA-associated ABMR, which could partly be explained by the fact that patients with de novo DSA-associated ABMR have biopsy later, when graft dysfunction and/or proteinuria are already present. ABMR is a progressive process with an early stage called subclinical ABMR (sABMR), in which histological lesions are present in the kidney graft without clinical graft dysfunction. These early lesions are now well recognized as risk factors for transplant glomerulopathy and poor graft survival in phenotype 1 ABMR (ref 5). The impact of sABMR associated with dnDSA at any time post-transplant has been less studied and reported. Recently, we published a retrospective multicenter study within the Spiesser Group that included 123 patients without graft dysfunction who underwent graft biopsy because of the presence of dnDSA (One Lambda, MFI > 1000). Performing a kidney graft biopsy after dnDSA indentification without renal dysfunction leads to the diagnosis of active sABMR in 35 % of cases. Nevertheless, we did not observe any effect of standard of care treatment in active sABMR. Very recently, an expert consensus for the recommended treatment for ABMR after KT was published. They concluded the clear lack of evidence but a standard of care for ABMR was nevertheless defined. Therefore, we propose to evaluate a new strategy for active sABMR, testing a conversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to belatacept associated with the recently recommended standard of care (SOC) compared to continuing CNI. Belatacept might help to manage nonadherence, decrease the toxicity of CNI on an endothelium already affected by microvascular inflammation, and reduce DSA titers. The monitoring of dnDSA after KT and an indication graft biopsy in case of appearance, even in the absence of graft dysfunction, is not part of a routine clinical practice in all KT centers. This strategy could be a valuable option, in order to begin treatment of ABMR before graft dysfunction occurs, and therefore to improve prognosis associated with phenotype 2 ABMR. Parajuli et al.4 suggested that early diagnosis and treatment of sABMR with SOC, using DSA monitoring may improve outcomes after KT, but this is a retrospective and no-randomized study. This study will be the first prospective randomized study in the context of de novo DSA. We will evaluate a new combination of treatment for ABMR in the context of dnDSA with subclinical lesions and in the same time may help to determine the real incidence of sABMR in KT recipients with subclinical dnDSA. The use of belatacept in the context of sABMR to improve the non-adherence and to decrease the endothelial toxicity had never been evaluated in a prospective way.
End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a significant clinical problem for which dialysis or transplantation is required. The current need for kidneys for transplantation vastly exceeds the supply available from live donors, necessitating the use of kidneys from deceased donors. However, kidneys from deceased donors are associated with reduced viability, as lack of blood supply upon cardiac death increases tissue damage. In addition, the standard protocol for cold preservation of donor kidneys between procurement and transplantation increases the risk of delayed donor kidney function by 23% for every 6-hours of storage. Moreover, compared to other organs, the kidney is particularly prone to transplantation-induced injury due to its high metabolic activities and oxygen consumption. Hence, any minor disturbances in blood supply can easily lead to kidney injury. Therefore, it is not surprising that deceased donor kidneys have a low tolerance for damage associated with lack of blood supply. The focus of the investigators research has been to pioneer the development and supplementation of existing kidney preservation solutions with novel hydrogen sulfide (H2S) donor molecules to improve kidney viability for clinical transplantation. Specifically, the investigators demonstrated that supplementation of standard kidney preservation solutions with non-clinically viable H2S donor molecules significantly increased donor kidney protection and prolonged transplant recipient survival in murine and porcine models of kidney transplantation. Having shown the same salutary effect using sodium thiosulfate (STS; a clinically viable H2S donor drug) in rat kidney transplantation, the investigators aim to repeat this work using STS in porcine and clinical kidney transplantation. This single-blind study will enroll participants receiving a kidney transplant. Through randomization, half of the participants will receive STS through administration into the pump the kidney is placed on after procurement from the donor and before transplant to the recipient. Participants will be followed for 1-year post transplant where blood and urine will be collected to determine graft function.
While robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) offers potential benefits such as minimal postoperative pain, better cosmesis, fewer wound infections, and shorter hospital stay, its efficacy in ABO-incompatible (ABO-i) KT compared to open KT (OKT) remains understudied. This study aims to compare ABO-i KT outcomes between RAKT and OKT. The study utilized data from 29 ABO-i RAKT and 210 ABO-i OKT cases performed at Asan Medical Center from October 2020 to February 2023. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with a composite of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA), and overall graft failure.
Divided into two groups based on acute kidney injury: non-acute kidney injury group vs. non-acute kidney injury group. Acute kidney injury group, Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN), Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE), or Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) I would like to divide it according to the definition. After testing the normal distribution of patients, donors, grafts, types of immunosuppressants, surgery/anesthesia factors, and blood test findings between the two groups through the Shapiro-Wilk test, continuous data was tested using the student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. Sizes are compared using , and categorical data is compared with proportions using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. Analysis of factors related to acute kidney injury will be performed through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.
This multicentre two-phased RCT aims to evaluate implementation potential, cost-effectiveness, effectiveness, and the role of exercise intensity of a home-based exercise and physical activity intervention to improve de novo kidney transplant recipients' physical fitness, cardiovascular health, gut microbiome characteristics, and health-related quality of life. The first phase of this study comprehends a six-month exercise training intervention. Patients will be randomized into (i) a sham intervention consisting of low-intensity balance and stretching exercises (LIT), (ii) a moderate-intensity aerobic and strength training intervention (MIT), or (iii) a moderate- and high-intensity aerobic and strength training intervention (MHIT). The second phase of this study comprehends a physical activity maintenance intervention provided to MIT and MHIT but not LIT. A total of 147 de novo kidney transplant recipients will be recruited from two independent Belgian transplant centres i.e. UZ Leuven and UZ Ghent.
The i-KITCaT study aims to harness cellular therapies to favourably alter the immunological response to in AKI in transplantation. Kidney transplantation offers the best survival and quality of life outcomes for patients with end-stage kidney disease but requires life-long immunosuppression. Efforts to increase the donor organ pool means accepting kidneys which have been subjected to medical and surgical factors culminating in acute kidney injury (AKI). There is no treatment to modify the maladaptive injury process following an AKI insult, and this subjects the new kidney to increased risk of needing dialysis in the first 7 days of transplantation, rejection, and shortened transplant survival. Tolerogenic dendritic cells (TolDC) are currently used in phase I/II clinical trials and are safe for patients receiving a kidney transplant from the same donor as these cells. These trials focus on transplant tolerance, but we will re-purpose TolDCs to favorably alter the disease course following AKI and limit injury following transplantation. Furthermore, if the patient's own cells (rather than from a third-party donor) can be used, this avoids supply limitations and potential sensitization risk. We will compare the functional characteristics of TolDC generated from control (healthy) and kidney disease (chronic kidney disease (CKD), dialysis and transplantation).
Cardiovascular disease (for example, heart attack, stroke, heart failure) is the commonest complication of kidney failure. Kidney transplantation reduces cardiovascular risk but cardiovascular disease remains the commonest cause of death in patients following transplantation. Current strategies to assess patient's cardiovascular risk prior to kidney transplantation do not identify those at highest risk and do not improve outcomes. This study will use a heart scan known as computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) to see whether this scan can identify patients at highest risk of future cardiovascular disease prior to transplantation. Studies have shown it is able to do this in patients with normal kidney function. The aim of this study is to develop CTCA as an effective tool to risk stratify patients prior to kidney transplantation.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of the MoveMend Health software program as an integrated supplement to traditional acute care/in-hospital occupational therapy for patients following liver and kidney transplants, as determined by recruitment rates, program completion, intervention adherence, safety incidence, and patient feedback on device/program performance.
There has been no effective predicting tool to accurately predict BKV reactivation after kidney transplantation. The aim is to elucidate the use of flow cytometric analysis for both intracellular cytokines and surface activation markers for BKV-specific T cell response in kidney transplant recipients.