View clinical trials related to Kidney Stone.
Filter by:This protocol seeks to determine if weight reduction with the Optifast VLCD program leads to reduced contribution of endogenous oxalate synthesis to the urinary oxalate pool in obese calcium oxalate stone formers.
The purpose of this basic research study is to determine the contribution of endogenous ascorbic acid (AA) turnover to urinary oxalate excretion in both normal BMI and obese adult non-stone formers and calcium oxalate stone formers. The studies proposed will use diets of known nutrient composition, a stable isotope of ascorbic acid (13C6-AA) and mass spectrometric techniques to quantify ascorbic acid turnover to oxalate.
The desire to reduce complications related to percutaneous access and morbidity related to tract size has led researchers to evaluate PCNL using smaller-caliber instruments. In this context, mini-PCNL has emerged. Its efficacy and safety have been demonstrated at the cost of a lower stone-free rate. The effectiveness of existing Ho: YAG lasers is limited by the need for manual removal of stone fragments and mobilization of them due to the lack of a simultaneous aspiration system. Consequently, this has been associated with long surgical times to achieve stone-free status. This requires multiple insertions and extractions of the nephroscope to facilitate the recovery of all fragments. This repeated step can cause the safety rails to be inadvertently removed or the sheaths to be disinserted. Sometimes compromising surgical results. Faced with this situation, the search for better and more efficient energy sources still continues. With this, modern lithotripters have emerged that combine energy sources and work more efficiently than any of them independently and, consequently, improve stone removal. Cyberwand ™ (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), Swiss Lithoclast® Master / Select (EMS SA, Switzerland / Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) and Shockpulse-SE ™ (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) are some examples; although they have their own set of advantages, none have proven to be superior to any other. As previously discussed, ballistic-ultrasonic lithotripsy combines ultrasonic and ballistic energy together with a suction system with encouraging results in terms of a shorter lithotripsy time and the respective economic impact of fewer surgical events and less operating time required for the stone removal. Therefore, it is convenient to make a comparison between the results of lithotripsy with Ho: YAG laser energy and lithotripsy with LithoClast Trilogy EMS; and thereby determine which is the most effective method in the resolution of kidney stones through a miniaturized percutaneous tract.
This study will assess patients who have recurrent urinary tract infections and kidney stones which are not blocking the kidney or causing other problems. Currently, we don't know if taking out these stones will improve recurrent urinary tract infections or not. Patients will make a decision with their surgeon about removing or monitoring their stone(s). Whether or not their infections continue with surgery or monitoring will be noted, and this information may help to inform future treatment decisions. The purpose of this study is to assess if treatment of these asymptomatic stones affects the rate of recurrent urinary tract infections.
The prevalence of nephrolithiasis is increasing over the last two decades, and kidney stones is a recurrent disorder, with lifetime recurrence risks reported to be as high as 50%. One of the most challenging stones is the lower pole (LP) nephrolithiasis. The standard management of lower pole stones (LPS), is still controversial especially for stones smaller than 20 mm, with retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and mini-PCNL (miniperc) both demonstrated to be safe and effective methods for treating LPS with a diameter of 1-2 cm. Selecting the optimal modality for treating renal calculi is challenging, as both techniques may be associated with different patient benefits and risk profiles. Despite the evolution of mini-PCNL and fURS techniques into clinical practice, there is a lack of comparative clinical data assessing SFRs and complication rates. To the investigators' knowledge, no previous studies have addressed the outcome of ambulatory tubeless miniperc as a same day procedure, which this study will look to assess. The investigators are planning to discharge all participants home the night of surgery, without admission or insertion of nephrostomy tube. This will decrease the morbidity of miniperc and encourage head-to-head comparison with fURS in a prospective randomized protocol.
The authors hypothesize that the RIRS using 150-microm Tm-fiber laser is superior than fiber with larger diameters, as 200-microm Tm-fiber laser or 200-microm holmium fiber laser, in such points as follows: - decreasing surgery time and laser-on time due to possibility of 4.3 fold ablation efficacy increase, which has been shown by Andreeva et al.; - increasing the flexible ureteroscope tip deflection lower pole stones availability; - decreased risk of complications and a better irrigation and visualization due to better irrigation with smaller fiber; - increasing of lithotripsy efficacy and laser beam density by lowering of beam focal spot due to using of lesser fiber diameter
This pilot study wants to determine to which extent SPCCT allows obtaining images with improved quality and diagnostic confidence when compared to standard Dual Energy CT (DECT), both with and without contrast agent injection. Depending on the anatomical structures/organs to be visualized during CT examinations, different scanning protocols are performed with quite variable ionizing radiation doses. Therefore, in order to obtain the most extensive and representative results of the improvement in image quality between SPCCT and DECT that will be performed CT imaging on several body regions and structures, including diabetic foot, diabetic calcium coronary scoring, adrenal glands, coronary arteries, lung parenchyma, kidney stones, inner ear, brain and joints, earl/temporal bone, colorectal carcinosis.
Although a CT scan is required for some Emergency Department patients with signs and symptoms of a kidney stone, recent evidence has shown that routine scanning is unnecessary and may expose young patients to significant cumulative radiation, increasing their risk of future cancers. Shared Decision-Making may facilitate diagnostic imaging decisions that are more inline with patients' values and preferences. By comparing a shared approach to diagnostic decision-making to a traditional, physician-directed approach, this study lays the foundation for a future randomized trial that will reduce radiation exposure, improve engagement, and improve the quality and patient-centeredness of Emergency Department care.
Randomized comparison of patient outcomes following standard PCNL versus mini-PCNL.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the first choice for the treatment of ≥ 2cm renal stones. The positions of PCNL includes supine, prone and lateral. PCNL has been performed in my center for nearly twenty years. The prone position is routinely used. Generally speaking, an abdominal cushion is used to raise the abdominal in the prone position, in order to provide an adequate exposure of kidney, increase the intercostal space, decrease the mobility of kidney and lower the risk of pleura injury. However, there is no consensus and criterion on the height of abdominal cushion. With largely increased PCNL procedures and various BMI, precise evaluation of abdominal cushion is needed. In the preliminary work, the investigators measured the sunken height of waist of 100 patients in the prone position without a abdominal cushion. The results showed that the mean BMI of 100 patients was 23.45 (16.79-36.98) and the range of sunken height of waist was 2-7 cm. Therefore, the investigators are planning to conduct a randomized controlled study to compare the safety and efficacy among no cushion group, 5 cm cushion group and 10 cm cushion group. To clarify the relationship between height of abdominal cushion and BMI, the nurse could prepare the appropriate cushion the day before surgery, which would decrease operating time and accelerate postoperative recovery.