View clinical trials related to Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca.
Filter by:This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of applying pulse Electrical Stimulation around eye after laser keratoplasty (LASEK) in patients with dry eye syndrome.
Clinical Study Evaluating Nordlys™ System with Selective Waveband Technology (SWT)® Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) Applicators for Dry Eye Disease (DED) due to Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD).
The purpose of this study is to observe the effect of 0.05% cyclosporine eyedrops combined with artificial tears in patients with dry eyes after corneal refractive surgery and to observe the changes in ocular surface characteristics and tear inflammatory cytokines before and after treatment.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the preliminary efficacy of the use of insulin eye drops in the control of dry eye disease in patients with topical hypotensors, compared to placebo (artificial tears). The main question aims to answer whether glaucoma patients treated with topical hypotensors could benefit from the use of insulin eye drops for the treatment of dry eye. Participants will be assigned to one of the two treatment arms and will be required to attend four follow-up visits (baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months).
Dry eye disease is a common condition affecting millions worldwide and costing millions in healthcare due to reduced work productivity and quality of life. The disruption of oil glands in our eyelids known as Meibomian glands, which produce the oily layer of our tears to protect it from evaporating, is one of the most common contributors of dry eye disease. Much effort has been put into developing effective treatments for this condition as new treatments are constantly being introduced to the market. The purpose of this clinical trial is to investigate how proven light-based therapies work in treating dry eye disease and oil gland disruption. These therapies include intense-pulsed light therapy (IPL) which uses a series of light flashes on the facial skin surface, and low-level light therapy (LLLT) which uses a mask with a series of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) to warm the body cells. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. What are the short- and long-term changes associated with these treatments on the eyelids and surface of the eyes? 2. Does LLLT alone work better than IPL+LLLT in treating dry eye disease and oil gland disruption? Participants with dry eye disease and oil gland disruption will receive four treatments with these light-based therapies each separated by two to three weeks apart, and followed up two to three weeks and three months after the final treatment session. One eye of the participant will receive intense pulsed light together with low-level light therapy, while the other eye will receive only low-level light therapy with a sham intense pulsed light treatment so that the researchers can compare if clinical signs and symptoms improve in one eye more than the other.
This study will evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of IC265 compared to vehicle in participants with signs and symptoms dry eye disease.
To demonstrate the non-inferiority of T2769 compared to Vismed® Multi in terms of total ocular surface staining (Oxford score) after 35 days of treatment. To evaluate the performance and safety of T2769 versus Vismed® Multi.
Patients who suffer from dry eye disease are often prescribed eye drops containing cyclosporine A that help with reducing inflammation. The newest eye drop containing cyclosporine A is called Cequa (Sun Pharma, Canada). Unfortunately, nearly a quarter of (24.2%) of patients using Cequa have reported some form of discomfort (burning and stinging) when instilling the drops. This potentially discourages patients from continuing the eye drop, which prevents their dry eye disease from being managed effectively. This study is trying to determine if refrigerating the eye drops would allow the drops to feel more comfortable when they are instilled in the eye.
To demonstrate that DMSt + RF improves eye blink quality in subjects with dry eye disease
This study investigates whether the oral intake of a probiotics capsule product may relieve dry eye symptoms. Participants will be aged between 20 - 65 years of age, with confirmed diagnosis of dry eye status. The participants will be assessed for several parameters and asked to take 1 probiotics capsule per day for 35 days. The parameters will include ocular surface health, tear volume, tear quality, intraocular pressure, tear osmolarity and serum biochemical test. After the 35 days are completed, the participants will be assessed again for the same parameters.