Clinical Trials Logo

IVF clinical trials

View clinical trials related to IVF.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04522479 Recruiting - IVF Clinical Trials

Prolonged Protocol of Early Follicular or Mid Luteal Phase

Start date: May 13, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Due to the injection of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) before controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH), the scheme of prolonged early follicular period protocol has obvious advantages in achieving ideal egg number, increasing endometrial receptivity to embryo transfer, inhibiting endogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) peak and reducing cycle cancellation rate. The full dose of long acting GnRH-a was also applied before COH in the mid luteal Hypergrowth program, and the mechanism of its lowering tone was similar. But whether the clinical and perinatal outcome of early follicular hyperlengthening is as effective as that of mid luteal hyperlengthening has not been reported at home and abroad. Moreover, there is a lack of prospective randomized controlled studies.

NCT ID: NCT04487925 Recruiting - IVF Clinical Trials

Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Versus Modified Natural Cycles in Poor Responders

MONACO
Start date: January 25, 2022
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

This is a prospective, randomized, single center, phase 4 controlled trial. The study will compare the efficacy of two different strategies for the management of predicted poor response patients under stimulation for IVF/ICSI: up to three MNC cycles (group 1) versus a single GnRH antagonist CFA (group 2).

NCT ID: NCT04477863 Recruiting - Infertility Clinical Trials

Follow-up With Preimplantation Genetic Testing Patients

Start date: July 11, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The main purpose of this study is to perform longitudinal evaluations of clinical outcomes and personal perspectives following utilization of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). Patients indicating willingness to participate in research during informed consent to perform PGT will be eligible for inclusion. A licensed genetic counselor will conduct a recorded interview.

NCT ID: NCT04447872 Recruiting - Infertility Clinical Trials

The LUTEAL Trial: Luteal Stimulation vs. Estrogen Priming Protocol

Start date: September 15, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Ovarian reserve defines the quantity and quality of the ovarian primordial follicular pool. Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) indicates a reduction in the quantity of ovarian follicular pool to less than expected for age. It is an important cause of infertility in many couples. To date, there is no clear consensus in the literature on the definition of diminished ovarian reserve, and it is unclear whether low oocyte yield results from an abnormal atresia rate of the follicle pool, or from a lower follicle pool at birth or whether it can just occur as a normal variation in the population. The ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins (for example, for in vitro fertilization) is largely determined by the ovarian reserve, and there are numerous different ovarian stimulation protocols that are employed to try and increase the oocyte yield of a particular cycle. There is no consensus on which, if any, of these protocols are superior and preferred for patient with DOR. Luteal gonadotropin stimulation is a protocol of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for use in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) that has emerged over the past decade as an acceptable alternative to the classic follicular gonadotropin stimulation. The luteal estradiol patch protocol was introduced in 2005 in patients with poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and to address the phenomenon of early follicle recruitment in patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). Luteal gonadotropin stimulation can potentially achieve the same effect by initiating follicular recruitment for IVF prior to the body's own premature recruitment. Our hypothesis is that the luteal stimulation protocol and estradiol priming protocol are equivalent with regard to the outcome of number of mature oocytes retrieved. Patients who will be undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation and who have a diagnosis of diminished ovarian reserve will be considered for this trial, and enrolled if meeting all inclusion and no exclusion criteria.

NCT ID: NCT04385342 Recruiting - IVF Clinical Trials

FSH Followed by HMG vs FSH Plus HMG in IVF

Start date: June 30, 2020
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of sequential administration of FSH and HP-hMG FSH alone versus concomitant administration of FSH and HP-hMG during controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles.

NCT ID: NCT04371783 Recruiting - IVF Clinical Trials

A Randomized Trial Comparing the Live Birth Rate of Immediate Versus Delayed FET Following a Freeze-all Strategy

FET
Start date: May 4, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This randomized trial we aim to compare the live birth rate of immediate versus delayed FET replacing a single blastocyst in the first FET of the first stimulated IVF cycle following. The hypothesis is that the live birth rate of the immediate FET is higher than the delayed FET replacing a single blastocyst in the first FET of the first stimulated IVF cycle following a freeze-all strategy. Women will undergo IVF/ICSI in the centre as clinically indicated. Standard ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins in a Gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol will be employed. Hormone replacement treatment (HRT) will be used in subsequent FET cycles. On Day 3 of the menstrual cycle, we will measure the anxiety levels using the Chinese State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and serum E2, cortisol levels will be checked on the same day. Recruited women having the first FET cycle following a freeze all strategy will be randomly assigned on the day of blastocyst(s) freezing according to a computer-generated randomization list into one of the following two groups.

NCT ID: NCT04265495 Recruiting - IVF Clinical Trials

Dual Trigger, Urinary HCG or Recombinant HCG, Which is the Best !?

Start date: February 9, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

a comparative study among dual trigger, urinary HCG and recombinant HCG regarding the outcome of ICSI- antagonist cycles

NCT ID: NCT04197167 Recruiting - IVF Clinical Trials

Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy as a Real Time Diagnostic Tool for Chronic Endometritis

Start date: December 12, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The Investigator propose to develop an in-vitro technique for the measurement and analysis of freshly excised biopsies during hysteroscopy procedure in patients with suspected Chronic Endometritis (CE) condition. Furthermore, the investigator propose to develop a discrimination model between the CE and inflammatory CE types using the measured spectroscopic data from freshly excised biopsies.

NCT ID: NCT04044599 Recruiting - IVF Clinical Trials

Lactobacillus for Luteal Phase Support

Start date: March 30, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of vaginal lactobacilli, a regulator of normal vaginal flora, on embryo implantation success during IVF / ICSI cycle follow-up.

NCT ID: NCT03913208 Recruiting - Infertility Clinical Trials

Priority to Cryopreservation Strategy (PCS) in IVF-ICSI Cycles

PCS
Start date: May 1, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This multicentre randomized controlled trial will be done to evaluate a new strategy in IVF-ICSI practice that gives that priority to freeze for the embryos and goes to fresh embryo transfer only if at least one set of same quality embryos is available for cryopreservation.