IUD Insertion Clinical Trial
Official title:
SUB LINGUAL MISOPROSTOL PRIOR TO IUD INSERTION IN WOMEN WITH ONLY PREVIOUS CESARIAN SECTION: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Verified date | March 2015 |
Source | Ain Shams University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | Egypt: Institutional Review Board |
Study type | Interventional |
The aim of the work is to evaluate the efficacy of the sub lingual prostaglandin E1 synthetic analogue (misoprostol) before IUD insertion to facilitate the procedure in patients delivered before only by cesarean section.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 124 |
Est. completion date | January 2015 |
Est. primary completion date | January 2015 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years to 45 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Normal size uterus. - Willing to participate. - Candidate for IUD insertion. - Delivered only by cesarean section. - Last delivery is more than 40 days before participating in the study. Exclusion Criteria: - Previous vaginal delivery - Signs of genital infection. - Menopause. - Body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg/m2. - Contraindication to misoprostol. - Copper allergy. - Positive pregnancy test. - Had a prior attempt for IUD insertion. - Uterine anomalies. - Uterine fibroid. |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator)
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Egypt | Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital | Cairo |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Ain Shams University |
Egypt,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Pain | The perception of pain and discomfort as described by the patient assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The scale will be graded from 0 to 10, 0 representing no pain at all and 10 worst possible imaginable pain. | During the procedure | No |
Secondary | Difficulty of Procedure | The degree of difficulty of the IUD insertion judged by the investigator as the resistance met at the internal cervical os. The procedure either graded as (easy), (moderate difficulty) or (difficult) or (failed insertion). | During the procedure | No |
Secondary | Complications | Uterine perforation, excessive bleeding, fever, IUD expulsion or any other unexpected complications will be assessed during the procedure and followed for the next 24 hours. | During the procedure and the following 24 hours. | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02708251 -
Glyceryl Trinitrate Versus Lidocaine Cream for IUD Insertion
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03473717 -
Comparison of Pain Level During Intrauterine Device (IUD) Insertion Between Conventional and Direct Method
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05204979 -
Vaginal Vs Subling Misoprost Before Iud Insertion in Women With Previous CS
|
||
Completed |
NCT02738203 -
Self-Administered Lidocaine Gel for Pain Management With IUD Insertion
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04441333 -
Usability, Safety and Efficacy of AspivixTM
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02904915 -
Paracervical Block Versus No Paracervical Block During IUD Insertion
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04046302 -
Vaginal Dinoprostone Administration Prior to an Intrauterine Device Insertion in Multiparous Women.
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04441281 -
Usability, Safety and Efficacy of AspivixTM (Comparative Study)
|
N/A |