IUD Insertion Clinical Trial
Official title:
Self-Administered Lidocaine Gel for Pain Management With IUD Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial
For intrauterine device (IUD) insertion, currently there are no standardized clinical guidelines for pain management. The investigators aim to explore whether adequate pain relief is possible through self-administered, non-invasive means alone. Reducing pain associated with IUD insertion may benefit patients and providers. When patients are comfortable during their procedure, it is likely the provider can more quickly and with fewer complications perform the insertion. The investigators propose to explore the effect of a locally applied vaginal lidocaine gel in place of the standard of care pain management, no intervention, prior to IUD insertions. This is a superiority, blinded, randomized controlled trial.
n/a
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed |
NCT02708251 -
Glyceryl Trinitrate Versus Lidocaine Cream for IUD Insertion
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT02141321 -
Sub Lingual Misoprostol Before IUD Insertion in Women With Only Previous Cesarean Section
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT03473717 -
Comparison of Pain Level During Intrauterine Device (IUD) Insertion Between Conventional and Direct Method
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05204979 -
Vaginal Vs Subling Misoprost Before Iud Insertion in Women With Previous CS
|
||
| Completed |
NCT04441333 -
Usability, Safety and Efficacy of AspivixTM
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02904915 -
Paracervical Block Versus No Paracervical Block During IUD Insertion
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT04046302 -
Vaginal Dinoprostone Administration Prior to an Intrauterine Device Insertion in Multiparous Women.
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT04441281 -
Usability, Safety and Efficacy of AspivixTM (Comparative Study)
|
N/A |