View clinical trials related to IUD Insertion.
Filter by:Insertion failures of intrauterine devices and cervical problems seem to occur more often among women who have never delivered vaginally. This trial will compare the effect of vaginal versus sublingual misoprostol prior to insertion of an intrauterine device in multiparous women delivered by CS.
Limited mobility of the uterine cervix and alignment with the vaginal canal is often required during insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD). Currently, the available instruments are traumatic tenacula, which could cause pain and bleeding and therefore represent an obstacle for certain patients to pursue their medical follow-up. AspivixTM is a new device, which enables atraumatic traction of the cervix while respecting its specific semi-circular anatomic shape through a system powered by a vacuum chamber. The aim of our pilot study is to assess the usability, safety and efficacy of the device. Note: Study is made of 2 phases (pilot phase followed by a comparative phase). Details regarding comparative study is registered separately.
Limited mobility of the uterine cervix and alignment with the vaginal canal is often required during insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD). Currently, the available instruments are traumatic tenacula, which could cause pain and bleeding and therefore represent an obstacle for certain patients to pursue their medical follow-up. AspivixTM is a new device, which enables atraumatic traction of the cervix while respecting its specific semi-circular anatomic shape through a system powered by a vacuum chamber. The aim of our comparative study is to assess the patient's pain and bleeding using the AspivixTM device in comparison with a commonly used single-tooth tenaculum (Pozzi forceps). Additionally, the comparative study aims to assess and compare the safety of the AspivixTM device with the single-tooth tenaculum (Pozzi forceps). Note: Study is made of 2 phases (pilot phase followed by a comparative phase). Details regarding pilot study is registered separately.
To investigate whether vaginal dinoprostone administered before intrauterine device (IUD) insertion reduces failed insertions, insertion-related complications, and pain in multiparous women.
The so-called "direct" method of intrauterine device (IUD) and intraintuerine system (IUS) insertion is increasingly used. A study has shown that it is technically simpler and assumes less painful than the classic pose. It seems interesting to compare the pain felt by the patients during IUD / IUS insertion in these two methods of placement and also to confirm that there is no more malposition with the direct method.
The purpose of this study is to compare the pain level and level of discomfort with paracervical block versus no analgesia in women who present to the University of Texas (UT) Physicians Obstetrics and Gynecology Continuity Clinic, The UT Physicians Women's Center, and the UT Physicians Women's Center- Bellaire for IUD insertion.
For intrauterine device (IUD) insertion, currently there are no standardized clinical guidelines for pain management. The investigators aim to explore whether adequate pain relief is possible through self-administered, non-invasive means alone. Reducing pain associated with IUD insertion may benefit patients and providers. When patients are comfortable during their procedure, it is likely the provider can more quickly and with fewer complications perform the insertion. The investigators propose to explore the effect of a locally applied vaginal lidocaine gel in place of the standard of care pain management, no intervention, prior to IUD insertions. This is a superiority, blinded, randomized controlled trial.
The intrauterine device (IUD) is a long-acting, highly effective, reversible contraceptive method that may be underutilized due to fear of pain during insertion. Although providers frequently prescribe non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for IUD insertion, there is no evidence for any pain reduction. Women can experience high levels of pain when the IUD is placed inside the uterus, and fear of this pain could be a reason that women decide not to use this method.
The aim of the work is to evaluate the efficacy of the sub lingual prostaglandin E1 synthetic analogue (misoprostol) before IUD insertion to facilitate the procedure in patients delivered before only by cesarean section.