Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The main purpose of this study is to increase the pool of organs available for donation by performing ARP to recondition donation after cardiac death (DCD) organs prior to transplantation. We will compare the outcomes of our ARP DCD liver transplants with historical data to determine the efficacy of this treatment compared to transplantation with standard DCD and donation after brain death (DBD) organs. We will also analyze biological samples from donors and recipients and compare them with outcome data in an effort to determine if any biological markers are able to predict the quality/success of the grafts.


Clinical Trial Description

Liver Transplantation and Limitations of DCD Transplantation:

Liver transplantation (LT) is the sole curative therapy for end stage liver disease and has emerged as the treatment of choice for hepatocellular carcinoma. Recent evidence has also demonstrated efficacy in a growing number of malignancies including intra/extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma, metastatic neuro-endocrine tumors, and colorectal liver metastases. Despite these advantages, LT is limited by the availability of suitable donor organs resulting in lengthened LT waitlist times. However, during this waiting period patients may deteriorate making them ineligible for LT. In the US, 16,000 patients are listed for LT, and approximately 2000 die annually while waiting for suitable organs. In 2017, over 500 Canadians were on a waiting list for LT and nearly 200 died or withdrew from the transplant list while waiting. Additionally, while LT secondary to hepatitis C is declining, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, alcoholic liver disease and transplant oncology indications are growing, increasing the overall demand for liver transplant.

One strategy to expand the donor pool has been to optimize utilization of organs from donation after cardiac death (DCD). While outcomes of DCD kidney, pancreas and lung transplants show similar patient and graft survival to donation after brain death (DBD) transplants, DCD livers have worse patient and graft survival, higher complications, and costs, along with worse quality of life. DCD liver grafts have twice the rate of early complications including primary non-function (PNF) and early allograft dysfunction (EAD). EAD is a transient condition with the potential for graft function recovery whereas PNF is a more severe complication leading to graft failure requiring emergency re-transplantation. In the long term, the use of DCD liver allografts is associated with a 10 fold increase in biliary complications, typically resulting in graft loss or death. Moreover, there is a high cost associated with complications and readmissions following LT, which can be upwards of $50,000 per patient. Studies investigating factors contributing to these costs have revealed that DCD allografts had the greatest impact on transplant costs. Consequently, initial enthusiasm for the use of DCD livers for LT has waned such that utilization is restricted to only ideal DCD livers from younger donors with short warm and cold ischemia times. Developing methodologies to reduce the complications associated with DCD organs and improve overall outcomes would have an immense impact on the lives of transplant patients while concurrently reducing costs on the healthcare system.

Abdominal Regional Perfusion and Limitations of Normothermic Machine Perfusion:

Conventional DCD recovery utilizes a rapid recovery technique which flushes abdominal organs with cold preservation solution to slow cellular metabolism and evacuate blood/clots to preserve the integrity of the microvasculature. This is preceded by the agonal phase between withdrawal of life support and cessation of cardiac function. During this period, abdominal organs are subject to warm ischemia resulting in accumulation of toxic metabolites, depletion of intracellular energy and anti-oxidant stores, leading to exacerbation of ischemia reperfusion at the time of implantation.

Abdominal Regional Perfusion (ARP) is a technique that has been developed to recondition DCD organs prior to transplantation through the perfusion of abdominal organs in-situ with re-oxygenated blood. This process reverses the effects of ischemia and hypoxia by restoring cellular energy stores and reducing oxygen free-radicals. Additionally, this period of restored abdominal perfusion also allows for functional evaluation of organ viability prior to graft use through measurement of donor serum/bile biochemistry throughout the perfusion process, thereby maximizing the yield of high quality grafts and avoiding the use of grafts that have impaired function.

In the few studies published to date, ARP has demonstrated a decrease in biliary complications by 86%, a decrease in ischemic cholangiopathy rates from 27% to 0% and a drop in EAD from 32% to 12%. Most importantly, graft loss at 30 days was only 2% in ARP compared with 12% in conventional DCD LT. Emerging evidence suggests that with ARP, transplants performed using DCD organs can result in outcomes similar to conventional DBD donors. In addition, other investigators have successfully used ARP to further expand the DCD donor pool by including donors beyond the traditional age limit of 50 years to patients greater than 75. This approach has the potential to dramatically increase the donor pool and has even been demonstrated to improve the quality of other organs used for transplant including kidney and heart transplantation.

Although normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) systems have demonstrated non-inferiority compared to static cold storage in LT by dropping perfusate lactate, improving intraoperative mean arterial pressure, reducing vasopressor requirements and reducing blood product transfusions, the majority (80%) of these donor livers were procured from DBD donors in which static cold storage continues to be the standard of care based upon three decades of favorable outcomes. There remains a paucity of data demonstrating the benefit of NMP in the setting of expanded criteria livers from donors with advanced age, steatosis, and DCD livers where ARP has been of proven benefit. In addition, ARP may also be advantageous due to its in-situ nature with preservation of the neurohormonal axis and communication with other abdominal organs. Few clinical studies have investigated the role of measurable variables in predicting ARP-DCD transplant outcomes; however, some correlation has been found between the effects of lactate levels, transaminase levels and the level of fibrosis on donor organ function. To address these unknowns, an additional goal of this study will be to identify possible mediators for the improved outcomes with abdominal-regional perfusion, and evaluate the utility of biomarkers to predict graft function. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03946852
Study type Interventional
Source London Health Sciences Centre
Contact Crystal Engelage, PhD
Phone 519-685-8500
Email crystal.engelage@lhsc.on.ca
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date June 2019
Completion date June 2026

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03213314 - HepaT1ca: Quantifying Liver Health in Surgical Candidates for Liver Malignancies N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04931420 - Study Comparing Standard of Care Chemotherapy With/ Without Sequential Cytoreductive Surgery for Patients With Metastatic Foregut Cancer and Undetectable Circulating Tumor-Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid Levels Phase 2
Terminated NCT00788125 - Dasatinib, Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, and Etoposide in Treating Young Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Malignant Solid Tumors Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT03756597 - PAN-study: Pan-Cancer Early Detection Study (PAN)
Recruiting NCT05160740 - Indocyanine Green Molecular Fluorescence Imaging Technique Using in Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer N/A
Completed NCT01906021 - Study of New Software Used During Ablations N/A
Terminated NCT04589884 - Intraoperative EXamination Using MAChine-learning-based HYperspectral for diagNosis & Autonomous Anatomy Assessment
Recruiting NCT05953337 - Radioembolization Trial Utilizing Eye90 Microspheres™ for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT04466124 - Prospective Cohort Study of Liver Cancer Patients Treated With Proton Beam Therapy
Not yet recruiting NCT04053231 - Hepatocarcinoma Recurrence on the Liver Study - Part2
Active, not recruiting NCT02869217 - Study of TBI-1301 (NY-ESO-1 Specific TCR Gene Transduced Autologous T Lymphocytes) in Patients With Solid Tumors Phase 1
Completed NCT03059238 - Parecoxib Versus Celecoxib Versus Oxycodone in Pain Control for Transcatheter Chemoembolization Procedure Phase 3
Recruiting NCT02632188 - Radical Surgery Followed by Immunotherapy Using Precision T Cells Specific to Multiple Common Tumor-Associated Antigen for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT01388101 - Real-time Diagnosis of Serum LECT 2 in Patient With Liver Cancer Using Electronic Antibody Sensor (e- Ab Sensor) N/A
Completed NCT01042041 - Sorafenib Tosylate and Chemoembolization in Treating Patients With Unresectable Liver Cancer Phase 1
Completed NCT00980239 - HAI Irinotecan + IV Bevacizumab, Bevacizumab & Oxaliplatin or Bevacizumab & Cetuximab in Advanced Cancers Metastatic to Liver Phase 1
Terminated NCT00903396 - Palonosetron Hydrochloride in Preventing Nausea and Vomiting Caused by Radiation Therapy in Patients With Primary Abdominal Cancer Phase 2
Completed NCT00790569 - Varenicline or Nicotine Patch and Nicotine Gum in Helping Smokers in a Methadone Treatment Program Stop Smoking N/A
Completed NCT00543777 - Magnetic Resonance Elastography and 2-Point Dixon MR Imaging Techniques in Diffuse Liver Disease Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated NCT00896467 - Psychological and Emotional Impact in Patients Undergoing Treatment For Metastatic Cancer Either in a Clinical Trial or as Standard Off-Trial Therapy N/A