View clinical trials related to Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
Filter by:This pilot study will be a randomized parallel trial comparing Mindfulness-Based Irritable Bowel Syndrome Eating Awareness Training done over an 8 week period to a standard low Fermentable Oligosaccharides, Disaccharides, Monosaccharides and Polyols diet.
This is a retrospective study designed to gather outcomes data from existing medical charts from patients who have taken EnteraGam for management of their IBS-D for at least eight weeks. Data from two study periods will be collected: (1) the time during which the Standard of Care (SOC) therapy (i.e., prescribed or over-the-counter as well as FDA-approved or non-approved agents) that is used immediately prior to prescribing EnteraGam; and (2) the time during which EnteraGam is used as therapy.
The study was quasi-experimental including patients in two intervention and control groups. Three measurements were done: pretest, post-test, and a two-months follow-up. The study population included patients with irritable bowel syndrome(diagnosed by specialists and based on the criteria of Rome III), who referred to a general Hospital. Fifty two irritable bowel syndrome patients were selected and assigned to two experiment (26 cases) and control (26 cases) groups. The criteria below were considered in selection of patients. Inclusion criteria: 1) Patients should not have participated in other psychological interventions concurrently; 2) Participants had not reported diagnosis of non-functional gastrointestinal illnesses. 3) Women patients had not been in pregnancy; 4) Participants had not met diagnosis of schizophrenia and bipolar disorders. Exclusion criteria: Three or more absences in the group sessions Co-variate variables: 1) demo-graphical variables (age, birth order, and education); 2) clinical variables (global psychological status, mind-body attribution, and duration of disease).
Abstract Background & Aims: Abdominal N line tenderness for diagnosis and shigyakusan for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome ( IBS ) and medically unexplained physical symptoms ( MUPS ) were studied. K1 is point of one quarters of distance from center of navel to right anterior superior iliac spine. K2 is one quarters of distance from center of navel to upside of the symphysis pubis. K3 is center of line from xiphoid process to navel. There are three relevant lines; K1-K3 line, K2-K3 line, and line of identical length to K1-K3 line originating from K2 and running parallel to K1-K3 line. Author collectively named these 'N line'. There was not the study under author's investigation that effects of shigyakusan and other medicines were compared. Author confirmed existence of mild IBS, for whose patients existing largely, various expensive examinations are spent. Method: The author put pressure on N line by deep palpitation and judged of abdominal N line tenderness positive or negative. Shigyakusan, a Kampo medicine, was administered to each of N line positive patients, of IBS by Rome III, of no IBS by Rome III, and of MUPS. The change of symptoms of IBS and MUPS by shigyakusan was showed with an arrow by self-declaration. Conclusions: Shigyakusan was more effective for IBS than previous medicines. IBS was diagnosed by Rome III and N line tenderness and author confirmed the existence of mild IBS which was diagnosed by N line tenderness with help of RomeIII. MUPS showed N line tenderness though patients complained of no abdominal symptoms. Shigyakusan was very effective for IBS, mild IBS and MUPS.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy as well as safety of rifaximin combined fecal microbiota transplantation(Gut microbiota reconstruction) in the treatment of IBS-D.
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders. It has prevalence in general population of 5-20% and is more common in women and young adults. Despite being one of the most frequent reasons for consultation many patients are undiagnosed. There are no reliable biomarkers. The diagnosis is clinical, based on the Rome III criteria. IBS is characterized by chronic or recurrent abdominal pain associated with changes in bowel frequency and consistency, when other etiologies are excluded. The combination of the Rome III criteria with the absence of alarm symptoms have a sensitivity of 65%, specificity of 100%, 100% positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 76%. Current tests commonly fail to obtain an objective diagnosis, and effective therapies are lacking. There are no specific endoscopic findings that can discriminate IBS patients from healthy patients. Most colonoscopies are performed to rule out other etiologies and in more than 50% of the cases are normal.
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional bowel disorder with recurrent abdominal pain and disordered defecation and is one of the most common gastrointestinal problems. In practice, IBS was frequently diagnosed as an exclusion diagnosis for patients with recurrent abdominal pain without an organic cause. Visceral hypersensitivity is the major contributing factor of abdominal pain in IBS. Accordingly, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are widely used for IBS, especially if abdominal pain is a prominent symptom. Indeed, meta-analysis also exhibits the clinically significant efficacy of low dose TCAs in IBS. Nevertheless, over 40% of IBS patients receiving TCAs had no improvement in symptoms after treatment. Theoretically, if TCAs are used for IBS patients with hypersensitivity, its efficacy could be increased. Although rectal distension test might be used to identify hypersensitive patients with IBS, it has been used only for clinical research because it is painful for the patient. On the contrary, colonoscopy is frequently performed in IBS patients to rule out organic disease and for the purpose of colorectal cancer screening. In a study by Kim and colleagues, IBS patients reported higher pain score after colonoscopy than non-IBS patients. This has prompted the hypothesis that pain scoring during/after colonoscopy could also segregate IBS patients with visceral hypersensitivity showing better treatment response of TCA than those without. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the colonoscopy-related pain perception and the treatment response of amitriptyline in IBS patients and to investigate the predictive values of the colonoscopy-related pain scale in identifying IBS patients with a response to amitriptyline treatment.
This phase 3, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of tenapanor in subjects with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C) as defined by the ROME III criteria and who have active disease as determined after a two-week screening period. Subjects who qualify and are randomized into the study will either receive 50mg BID of tenapanor or placebo BID for 12 week treatment period and then undergo a 4 week placebo controlled randomized withdrawal.
Clostridium Butyricum might be an effective drug in treating irritable bowel syndrome
Background: Breath testing for food intolerances is becoming routine in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID). Both FGID and saccharide intolerances (FODMAPs: fermentable oligo-, di-, polysaccharide and polyols, e.g. lactose, fructose, sorbitol) are common (>10% of any given population) and often respond to dietary modification. The breath tests are based on quantification of gas excretion in breath as a sign of malabsorption and symptom provocation, but are likely subject to considerable psychological bias. The role of expectation and other psychological effects on breath testing has not been reported, but is crucial for the validation of these increasingly wide-spread tests with considerable dietary and potentially deleterious consequences. Fructose has been shown to result in short term pro-inflammatory metabolic responses, but these effects have not been studied as underlying causes for intolerance symptoms in fructose intolerant patients with FGID. Aim: To investigate the psychological component and the short-term metabolic effects of fructose breath testing in patients referred for evaluation of FGID using placebo. Additionally, to assess baseline predictors for a positive breath test result. Methods: Fructose intolerance (defined by a positive symptom index) and malabsorption (defined by increased breath hydrogen/methane concentrations) will be determined in 30 successive male and female FGID in a single centre using breath-testing. Fructose 35g, given double-blind as well as open, a sweet placebo (cyclamate/saccharine; Assugrin®) and a neutral (still water) placebo given double-blind will be compared in a randomized, cross-over sequence and according to our standardised procedure on four separate study days. Symptoms will be recorded using standardised questionnaires and breath concentrations of H2 and CH4 will be measured during testing on the four study days. Somatisation and psychological profiles will be assessed by questionnaires. Blood samples will be obtained before and during provocation testing to assess short-term responses to fructose loading by metabolomics. Fructose, blinded and open, and placebo responses will be compared and baseline predictors for a positive breath tests assessed.