View clinical trials related to Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
Filter by:Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most commonly diagnosed functional bowel disorders (FBD). IBS is diagnosed by symptom-based criteria，while the available literature suggests that symptom-based diagnostic algorithms, which often used for clinical and research studies, have poor sensitivity. Although diagnostic algorithms can discriminate IBS from health or upper gastrointestinal tract conditions, studies do not provide convincing evidence that the criteria can discriminate IBS from organic disease of the colon. Rectal bleeding, anemia, weight loss, fever, family history of colon cancer, and age above 50 years are considered the warning signs of severe gastrointestinal disease. Colonoscopy is the most direct way to rule out organic colonic diseases. There is no consensus so far on whether patients with suspected IBS lacking warning signs need colonoscopy or not. In 2016, the Rome IV criteria was updated and published. However, there are few studies on the clinical practice based on Rome IV. The value of alarm symptoms in discriminating organic disease from functional disorders remains uncertain and further research is needed. To evaluate the predictive value of alarm symptoms of IBS patients based on Roman IV, the investigators designed this cross-sectional study.
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a strategy that infuses a fecal suspension containing a healthy donor's microbiota into a patient's gut to restore his/her intestinal microbiome. FMT has a higher cure rate than standard antibiotic treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile infections,and shows promising results in Inflammatory bowel disease（IBD）.However, few studies have evaluated whether FMT is effective to treat Irritable bowel syndrome(IBS).The investigators propose to determine the efficiency and safety of FMT in patients with Irritable bowel syndrome.
This study of the efficacy and safety of Plecanatide in children 6 to <18 Years of Age with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation (IBS-C)
The purpose of this study Is to evaluate if a 4 weeks probiotic VSL#3 treatment and a strict LFD for 4 weeks are equally good in treating IBS symptoms in IBS patients with diarrhoea or mixed predominance and further evaluate the long term effect. Hopefully this one year individualized web-based IBS study will generate a fundament that could be used as a treatment in the primary care/sector to IBS patients.This one year study will be carried out based on an eHealth platform ibs.constant-care.com. Patients will self-measure on the web-program the first 4 weeks before randomization. The patients will fill out different questionnaires regarding symptom severity, adherence, stool consistency and frequency, quality of life, disease course type, food registration and weight. Nearly all of the questionnaires are illustrated to the patients in a traffic light manner (Green, Yellow and Red). They will also self-measure Fecal calprotectin on their smart phones and send in fecal samples for microbiome analysis. In this randomized cross over study - 104 IBS patients will be randomized to either a diet low in FODMAPs (fermentable, oligo-, di- and monosaccharides and polyols, LFD) or the probiotic product VSL#3® for 4 weeks. The probiotic group will receive 2 sachets a day (450 billions live bacteria in one sachet) for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks intervention (LFD or VSL#3) non responders, defined as a reduction of less than 50 points in IBS-SSS will after two weeks wash out period be crossed over. IBS patients randomized to LFD and responds to LFD will after a reintroduction counselling with dieticians at North Zealand university hospital after 4 weeks on a strict LFD start reintroducing high FODMAP foods until symptom flare (individual defined as either Yellow or Red, >175 in IBS-SSS). Hereafter they will go on a strict LFD again until symptom remission (IBS-SSS below 175, Green zone) - LFD responders will continue with this procedure for 10 months. IBS patients initially randomized to VSL#3 and are after 4 weeks of intervention characterized as responders will not be offered a LFD. Instead they will self- measure on the web with no intervention after the 4 weeks of VSL#3 treatment. When/if they reach a symptom flare ( again individually defined as either Yellow or Red, >175 point in IBS-SSS) they will be offered another 4 weeks VSL#3 treatment.
To evaluate the efficacy on abdominal symptoms (abdominal bloating, abdominal discomfort, and abdominal pain) and safety of linaclotide 290 μg administered orally to patients with IBS-C.
To evaluate the effect of curcumin food supplement on gut microbiota of children with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and to review any correlation between the changes in the microbiota with symptoms.
52 adult IBS patients were recruited. 50% were given a fecal microbiota transplantation in colonoscopy and 50% were given an FMT made of their own feces as placebo. follow up time was 1 year after FMT.
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) carries a high prevalence worldwide and imposes substantial economic burden on patients, healthcare systems and society. In recent years, dysbiosis of the gut microbiota and bile acid (BA) malabsorption have been identified as putative pathophysiological mechanisms. Bile acid metabolism and gut microbiota are closely related. When patients with IBS-D were compared to healthy subjects, total levels of faecal BAs do not differ, but increased faecal primary BAs and reduced secondary BAs have been repeatedly observed in patients with IBS-D, suggesting abnormal BA deconjugation. Rifaximin, a non-absorbable antibiotic, has been shown in a recent meta-analysis to produce a therapeutic clinical gain compared to other treatment options for IBS, including placebo, paralleled by a high safety profile. It is also now known that changes in fecal microbiota have been observed in patients with IBS who have responded positively to Rifaximin. The relationship between microbiota changes, metabolomics changes after Rifaximin is unclear. There is emerging data to suggest duodenal dysbiosis as a putative pathophysiology, which in one study, clustered together with salivary microbiota than with fecal microbiota. However, the oral microbiome in patients with IBS has never been explored, which could possibly explain the downstream observations of duodenal and fecal dysbiosis. The investigators aim to assess the changes in metabolomic and microbiota profile after Rifaximin treatment, between responders and non-responders. The investigators will also explore the oral microbiome in IBS patients, and assess its relationship with fecal microbiome between responders and non-responders.
A placebo controlled study to determine the efficacy and mode of action of ondansetron in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea.
This is an open labeled, one-armed real-world study in IBS-patients. All participants will receive active treatment for 12 weeks. The primary objective of the study is to assess the effect of Human Milk Oligosaccharides (HMOs) on bowel function in adults with IBS. Secondary objectives are to evaluate HMOs' tolerability, effect on participant reported satisfaction with bowel habits, interference with life in general, quality of life, somatic symptoms, and anxiety and depression in all patients and subgroups of patients.