View clinical trials related to Irreversible Pulpitis.
Filter by:this study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of full pulpotmy after application of Biodentine, or MTA, or Portland cement above PRF membrane In permanent molars with irreversible pulpitis
To evaluate in a comparative way the perception of the patient who comes with pain due to irreversible pulpitis in a tooth and who receives two types of treatment: complete pulpectomy (or control group) or pulpotomy (or experimental group). Prospective randomized and multicenter study. It will be carried out in 4 centers of similar socio-professional characteristics, with the same operative protocol. On a significant sample of emergency patients with a concrete clinical manifestation of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, one type of intervention or another will be performed randomly. The data will be collected by means of a visual numeric scale (NRS). The null hypothesis is that both interventions provide the same reduction of pain in patients who present symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. All the patients who come to one of the private centers with irreversible pulpitis and who meet the defined criteria for inclusion and exclusion will be selected. The type of procedure that will be performed in the control group will be the complete removal of the pulp by means of a defined instrumentation technique, also called Pulpectomy. The procedure to be performed in the experimental group will be the removal of the pulp only at coronal level, also called Pulpotomy. The interventions will be assigned randomly and the "List Randomizer" (random.org) will be used for the randomization.
Inferior alveolar nerve block using either 0.5% bupivacaine alone or in addittion to mannitol in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars.
The aim of this randomized, double-blinded, controlled study is to evaluate the effect of pre-operative oral aceclofenac on the success of the inferior alveolar nerve block with 2% Mepivacaine containing 100,000 Epinephrine for patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of iRoot SP as a root canal sealer in comparison with AH Plus sealer within 1-year follow up.Patients needing root canal treatment were enrolled and allotted into either iRoot SP group or AH Plus arm randomly. After root canal shaping and cleaning, the teeth were obturated according to their arms. Assessment of postoperative pain was done 1 week after root canal obturation using visual analog scale. After 1-year follow-up, clinical and radiographic evaluations were carried out. Statistical analysis at P < 0.05 was conducted to measure difference between the arms.
Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate premedication with ketorolac infiltration on post endodontic pain in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Design: Randomized double blind clinical trial Setting and conduct: Sixty adult volunteers with including criteria will be divided into two groups (n=30) based on random table. All patients will receive standard inferior alveolar nerve block of 2% lidocaine with 1:800000 epinephrine and supplemental buccal infiltration of 0.9 mL 2% lidocaine with 1:800000 epinephrine. After five minutes one group will receive supplemental buccal infiltration of 30 mg/mL of Ketorolac Tromethamine and the control group will receive buccal infiltration of normal saline. Endodontic access preparation will initiate after 15 minutes of initial IANB with two negative responses to the electric pulp test. The pain level will be recorded immediately and at the 2,4,6 and 24 hours following the treatment using Heft- Parker Visual Analog Scale (HP- VAS). Data will be evaluated using Repeated measured test (if possible) and otherwise non-parametric tests such as rival Friedman and X2 test. Participants including major eligibility criteria: all patients age ranged 18-65 with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (HP VAS ≥54) and without pain on percussion on a mandibular molar tooth who need root canal treatment and are without systemic diseases; nonsmoking; non pregnant, non breast feeding without any medicine consumption or analgesic and sedation Intervention: Ketorolac infiltration Main outcome measures: Pain level at immediately after the treatment, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours following the root canal treatment using HP VAS.
This study compared the anesthetic efficacy between Lignocaine and articaine administering it intraligamentarly using ligajet in twenty five female patients having irreversible pulpitis on bilateral mandibular molars. At 5minutes of post injection, the teeth were isolated with rubber dam and access performed. Patients were instructed to definitively rate any pain felt during endodontic procedure. If patient felt pain, the treatment was immediately stopped and the patient rated their discomfort using Heft Parker VAS. The extent of access achieved when the patient felt pain was recorded as within dentin, entering the pulp chamber or initial file placement. The success was defined as the ability to access and instrument the tooth without pain (VAS score of zero) or mild pain (VAS rating<54mm).
The aim of this study is premedication efficacy of analgesics on post endodontic pain. Sixty-six healthy adult volunteers including criteria, are participating. The patients will be divided into 3 groups and will be randomly given one of pre medications including 1) 10 mg Ketorolac, 2) 10 mg Ketorolac plus 1000mg Acetaminophen, and 3)Placebo, 45 minutes before applying the injection. All patients will receive standard root canal treatment. Patients will record their post treatment pain using a Heft parker Visual Analog Scale(VAS). Success will be considered as no or mild pain (VAS≤54)with no need to take analgesic. Data will be analysed using Mann-U-Whitney and Kruskal-wallis tests.
The aim of this study is effect of premedication on success of inferior alveolar nerve block injection. Sixty healthy adult volunteers including criteria, are participating. The patients will be divided into 3 groups and will be randomly given one of premedications including 1) 10 mg Ketorolac, 2) 10 mg Ketorolac plus 1000mg Acetaminophen, and 3)Placebo, 45 minutes before applying the injection. All patients will receive standard Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block injection . Patients with no lip numbness and positive responses to cold and electric pulp tests would be excluded from the study. Endodontic access preparation will be initiated 15 minutes after Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block injection. Pain during treatment will be recorded using a Heft parker Visual Analog Scale(VAS). Success will be considered as no or mild pain (VAS≤54) during caries/dentin removal, access cavity preparation and working lengths measurements. Data will be analysed using Mann-U-Whitney and Kruskal-wallis tests.
Root canal therapy will ideally eliminate post-endodontic pain but occasionally analgesics are needed to diminish the pain [1]. Development of pain after completion of root canal treatment may undermine patients' confidence in the procedure and the clinician [2]. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are one of the most frequently taken analgesic medications for dental pain. Their popularity attributed to their efficacy in relieving pain and fever and low side effect profile at therapeutic doses [3]. Mono-therapy analgesic has a low effect on dental pain. Improvement was performance by combining analgesics with different mechanisms of action without raising any adverse effects [4], was effective in controlling moderate to severe pain. The combination of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and paracetamol has shown additive analgesia for treating dental pain in several studies [5,6]. Endodontic treatment with a lower prevalence of postoperative pain is usually the treatment of choice. There have been no controlled dental studies evaluating the additive effects of combining a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug with paracetamol. Breivik et al [6] & Menhinick et al [7] found that a combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen was more effective than ibuprofen alone in managing postoperative pain. Aim of the present study, to evaluate the efficacy of the paracetamol when used alone and in combinations with three groups of drugs to control postoperative endodontic pain.