View clinical trials related to Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.
Filter by:The objective of the study is to pilot a parent-to-parent coaching model with experienced family members of children with Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (IMV) as parent coaches.
Invasive mechanical ventilation is one of the most important and life-saving therapies in the intensive care unit (ICU). In most severe cases, extracorporeal lung support is initiated when mechanical ventilation is insufficient. However, mechanical ventilation is recognised as potentially harmful, because inappropriate mechanical ventilation settings in ICU patients are associated with organ damage, contributing to disease burden. Studies revealed that mechanical ventilation is often not provided adequately despite clear evidence and guidelines. Variables at the ventilator and extracorporeal lung support device can be set automatically using optimization functions and clinical recommendations, but the handling of experts may still deviate from those settings depending upon the clinical characteristics of individual patients. Artificial intelligence can be used to learn from those deviations as well as the patient's condition in an attempt to improve the combination of settings and accomplish lung support with reduced risk of damage.
Invasive mechanical ventilation is a life-saving treatment in critically ill newborns with respiratory failure. However, continuing this treatment for a long time may have negative consequences, especially bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) secondary to mechanotrauma. For this reason, it is essential to terminate the mechanical ventilation treatment at the most appropriate time. About half of the extremely preterm babies may fail extubation even if the clinical criteria traditionally used for extubation are met. Unsuccessful extubation is associated with increased intraventricular bleeding, death, BPD, death or BPD, longer duration of ventilator support. When respiratory failure and lung pathologies of extremely preterm babies begin to improve, the target for mechanical ventilation should be early and successful extubation. Currently, the decision to extubate a preterm baby is primarily based on clinical judgment. Only a few studies that showed the low predictive value and limited utility using different measures have evaluated readiness for extubation. Lung ultrasonography (USG) is a noninvasive bedside technique that has been found useful for predicting the success of weaning from the ventilator in adults; however, very little data are available in neonates. In a recently published study, it was proposed an extubation readiness estimation tool based on clinical and demographic data of preterm babies who were attempted elective extubation. The researchers' hypothesis is that the use of a model based on extubation success scoring and lung USG scoring before extubation reduces the failure of the first extubation attempt in very low birth weight infants. The aim of the study is to evaluate the value of using an integrated model based on pre-extubation "extubation readiness predictor" and lung USG scoring to predict extubation success in preterm babies undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation.
Some ICU ventilated patients might present with large tidal volume despite very low or inexistant presser support. Patient-Self Inflicted Lung Injury (P-SILI) might appear related with large alveolar stretch an distension. Two clinical presentations are observed: patients with or without respiratory distress signs such as supra-clavicular depression and thoracic-abdominal asynchronies. The aim of this study is to compare the pulmonary physio(-patho)logical parameters of these two types of patients (eupneic or with respiratory distress signs), and presenting important TV in spite of a minimal adjustment of the ventilatory support, except for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS).