Clinical Trials Logo

Invasive Mechanical Ventilation clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.

Filter by:
  • Completed  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT04383730 Completed - Clinical trials for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Inhaled Sedation in COVID-19-related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ISCA): an International Research Data Study in the Recent Context of Widespread Disease Resulting From the 2019 (SARS-CoV2) Coronavirus Pandemics (COVID-19)

ISCA
Start date: June 26, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The authors hypothesized that inhaled sedation, either with isoflurane or sevoflurane, might be associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS, compared to intravenous sedation. The authors therefore designed the "Inhaled Sedation for COVID-19-related ARDS" (ISCA) non-interventional, observational, multicenter study of data collected from the patients' medical records in order to: 1. assess the efficacy of inhaled sedation in improving a composite outcome of mortality and time off the ventilator at 28 days in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS, in comparison to a control group receiving intravenous sedation (primary objective), 2. investigate the effects of inhaled sedation, compared to intravenous sedation, on lung function as assessed by gas exchange and physiologic measures in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS (secondary objective), 3. report sedation practice patterns in critically ill patients during the COVID-19 pandemics (secondary objective).

NCT ID: NCT04199273 Completed - Intensive Care Unit Clinical Trials

Assessment of Human Diaphragm Strength by Magnetic and Electric Stimulation After Ultrasonography Phrenic Nerve Tracking

SONOSTIM
Start date: October 30, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Development and validation of a new affordable and easy-to-use phrenic nerve stimulation tool for diaphragm strength assessment in intensive care unit

NCT ID: NCT03955874 Completed - Critical Illness Clinical Trials

Mechanical Ventilation Discontinuation Practices

IOS
Start date: November 4, 2013
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Background: The requirement for ventilator support is a defining feature of critical illness. Weaning is the process during which the work of breathing is transferred from the ventilator back to the patient. Approximately 40% of the total time spent on ventilators is dedicated to weaning. The extent of practice variation in how this complex and expensive technology is discontinued from critically ill patients is unknown. Meanwhile, practice variation has been shown to adversely impact upon patient safety and clinical outcomes. Purpose: To characterize practice pattern variation in weaning and the consequences of weaning variation by implementing an international, prospective observational study in Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe, India and Australia/New Zealand. Primary Objectives: To describe 1. weaning practice variation among regions in 5 domains (the use of daily screening, preferred methods of support used before initial discontinuation attempts, use of written protocols, preferred methods of evaluating spontaneous breathing, and sedation and mobilization practices). 2. the assocation between selected discontinuation strategies and important clinical outcomes (length of stay, mortality, duration of ventilation). Methods: The investigators propose to conduct a large scale, observational study involving critically ill adults requiring ventilator support for at least 24 hours to evaluate practices in discontinuing ventilators in 150 centres. The investigators will classify each new admission over the observation period according to the initial strategy that precipitated or facilitated ventilator discontinuation. Relevance: This novel study will build collaborations with critical care investigators from around the world and industry

NCT ID: NCT02877524 Completed - Clinical trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Trial to Study Intubation Rates of Non-invasive Ventilation Using Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) Versus Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) Mode in Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

PSV vs ASV for
Start date: September 1, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The clinical course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with recurrent episodes of exacerbation that results in respiratory failure. The treatment of respiratory failure is supportive and involves inhalation bronchodilators along with systemic steroids. In few cases the management of acute respiratory failure requires positive pressure ventilation (non-invasive or invasive). The use of NIV in acute exacerbation of COPD has resulted in significant reduction in morbidity and mortality. Although pressure support ventilation (PSV) allows the patient to influence the breathing pattern, ventilator-cycling criteria may worsen the patient-ventilator interaction, and severe asynchronies occur in up to 43% of patients undergoing NIV for ARF. Adaptive support ventilation (ASV) is a newer mode of ventilation that incorporates feedback mechanisms and thus provides a stable minute ventilation. We hypothesize that the use of ASV as a mode during ventilation using NIV in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD may result in reducing the duration of ventilatory support, need for intubation, and duration of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, when compared with PSV mode of NIV ventilation.

NCT ID: NCT02877498 Completed - Clinical trials for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

A Study to Compare Adaptive Support Ventilation vs. Volume Controlled Ventilation for Management of Respiratory Failure in Patients With Neuroparalytic Snake Envenomation

ASV vs VCV in
Start date: December 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Neuroparalytic snake envenomation results in severe muscle weakness and respiratory failure. Treatment requires administration of anti-snake venom and supportive care in the form of invasive mechanical ventilation. Whether using adaptive support ventilation (a closed loop mode of ventilation) in comparison to volume controlled ventilation will shorten the duration of ventilation remains undetermined. The current study is planned to compare adaptive support ventilation (ASV) mode of ventilation versus volume controlled ventilation (VCV) during invasive mechanical ventilation for the management of respiratory failure secondary to neuroparalytic snake envenomation.

NCT ID: NCT02380547 Completed - Critical Care Clinical Trials

Sonographic Evaluation of Diaphragmatic Function in Critical Care Patients With Use of Non Invasive Ventilation

ECHODIA
Start date: June 19, 2015
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Usefulness of non invasive ventilation in patients extubated after more than 48 hours of invasive ventilation is still in debate except for specific patients (chronic pulmonary disease and chronic heart failure). Many experimental and clinical studies have shown that diaphragmatic function is depressed by mechanical ventilation in intubated patients. The investigators will test the hypothesis that non invasive ventilation after extubation may improve diaphragmatic function