Clinical Trials Logo

Intubation clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Intubation.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04865081 Recruiting - Intubation Clinical Trials

Clinical Evaluation of an Aerosol Protective Intubation Device on Videolaryngoscopic Intubation Difficulty

Start date: April 19, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The VACCIN box, an anti-aerosol intubation box for potential use on COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) positive patients, was designed in order to reduce the transmission risk to healthcare workers. This study will compare the safety and the ease of use of the VACCIN box to a standard intubation in healthy participants undergoing elective surgery. It is expected that intubation times and success rate of intubation in the same circumstances will be similar with and without the use of the VACCIN box.

NCT ID: NCT04802122 Completed - Intubation Clinical Trials

Induction of Anesthesia With Sevoflurane Preserving Spontaneous Breathing: Cardiorespiratory Effects.

Start date: May 24, 2021
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Airway management is of outmost importance in the perioperative period. One of the main questions while making a plan for airway management is whether spontaneous ventilation should be maintained or not. Induction of anesthesia with Sevoflurane is a conventional technique that preserves spontaneous ventilation. It is used especially in non-collaborating patients or when other pharmaceutical agents or sophisticated airway management equipment is out of reach. Inhalational induction of anesthesia with Sevoflurane is well studied. However, there are few studies investigating the effects of Sevoflurane on induction and intubating conditions, on cardiopulmonary physiology, on emergence conditions, when it is used as one and only agent to achieve induction of anesthesia, intubation and maintenance of anesthesia in adult patients. There is also no consensus on the appropriate duration of the inhalational induction or other criteria to guarantee successful intubation conditions, since most studies investigate Sevoflurane administration until induction of anesthesia and not until intubation. From all the above, it appears that there are a few gaps in the management of patients who are to be intubated with Sevoflurane only, without the use of any other anesthetic agents.

NCT ID: NCT04782817 Recruiting - Intubation Clinical Trials

Reducing Reintubation Risk in High-Risk Cardiac Surgery Patients With High-Flow Nasal Cannula

Start date: November 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare reintubation rates and outcomes of patients treated with high-flow nasal canula oxygen therapy (HFNC) and patients treated with provider choice of standard care.

NCT ID: NCT04753515 Completed - Sedation Clinical Trials

Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol for Sedation During Awake Endotracheal Intubation

Start date: March 5, 2021
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare the sedation effect of dexmedetomidine and propofol when they are both combined with midazolam and remifentanil during awake endotracheal intubation.

NCT ID: NCT04745936 Completed - Intubation Clinical Trials

Comparison of Different Stylet Angles for Orotracheal Intubation Using C-MAC® Video Laryngoscopes in Infants

Start date: March 3, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the difference in stylet curvature affects the ease of tracheal intubation using C-MAC videolaryngoscope in infants under 1 year of age.

NCT ID: NCT04701762 Completed - Intubation Clinical Trials

Endotracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy

Start date: March 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The investigators will evaluate the endotracheal intubation using video laryngoscopy versus conventional direct laryngoscopy on intubation success, quantified by the number of intubation attempts. The question is important because video laryngoscopes are more expensive than conventional direct laryngoscopes. The additional cost might be justified if video systems improve intubation success and reduce airway trauma. But if they do not, the extra cost would not be justified

NCT ID: NCT04628611 Completed - Intubation Clinical Trials

Comparison Between Rigid Video Assisted Laryngoscopy vs Flexible Laryngoscopy in Anticipated Difficult Intubation

Start date: March 1, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is a randomized control study where adult patients had been divided randomly into two equal groups using video laryngoscope in group (V) and flexible intubating laryngoscope in group (F)

NCT ID: NCT04620434 Recruiting - Intubation Clinical Trials

Improvement of the Glottic View by Video Laryngoscope

Start date: June 23, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This study aims to compare the exposure of glottis by the use of video and direct laryngoscopy.

NCT ID: NCT04426409 Completed - Intubation Clinical Trials

Nasal Ointment on Epistaxis of Nasotracheal Intubation in Children

Start date: July 8, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Nasotracheal intubation is one of the anesthetic procedures required for oral surgery. It allows the surgeon easier access to the surgical site than the orthotracheal intubation. Therefore, nosotracheal intubation is commonly used for general anesthesia for oral and maxillofacial surgery and dental treatment. However, nasotracheal intubation can damage the nasal mucosa in the course of the tube passing through the nostrils, causing epistaxis which is reported as the most common side effect. In order to reduce these side effects, heating of the tube and use of a tube lubricant immediately before intubation have been recommended in children. However, research on whether the dry state of the mucosa itself contributes to the development of epistaxis is limited. A study in adults reported that pretreatment of the ointment on the mucosa reduced the damage to the mucosa. However, its effect on the incidence of epistaxis in children has not been studied. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of pretreatment of nasal ointment on epistaxis of nasotracheal intubation in children.

NCT ID: NCT04411056 Completed - Intubation Clinical Trials

A Study Comparing Time to Intubate With and Without a Barrier Box

Start date: May 7, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study is for patients who will be having surgery and will have a breathing tube placed during intubation. The purpose of the research is to study the time it takes to use a barrier box for placement of a breathing tube. A barrier box is a clear box that sits over the head and shoulders of a patient as a breathing tube is placed. The box is used to protect the healthcare provider's exposure to coronavirus in patients who have COVID-19. The study will not include patients who test positive for COVID-19 or who are sick with COVID-19 symptoms. The researchers want to learn how long it takes to use the barrier box before it is used routinely in COVID-19 patients.