View clinical trials related to Intracranial Aneurysm.
Filter by:The scope of this trial is the collection and analysis of effectiveness and safety endpoints, related to the use of the Bioabsorbable/Nufairy Coil Embolization System in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the most effective timing for clipping in adults with ruptured intracranial aneurysms. It will also assess the safety of performing the surgery at different times of early period after the aneurysm has ruptured. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does ultra-early surgical intervention ( less than 24 hours of rupture) improve survival rates compared to delayed surgery (24 to 72 hours after rupture)? 2. What are the complication rates associated with early versus delayed surgical intervention? Researchers will compare clipping in ultra-early period to surgery in early period to see if timing affects the outcomes for treating ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Participants will: - Be randomly assigned to undergo surgical clipping either within 24 hours of rupture or between 24 hours to 72 hours after the rupture. - Visit the clinic for follow-up assessments at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-surgery. - Keep a diary of their symptoms, neurological function, and any complications they experience post-surgery.
This is a retrospective, hospital-based and multi-center study aiming at investigating the potential exposures associated with the formation, progression, and rupture of intracranial aneurysms in Chinese population.
Since its launch in China in 2014, Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) has been widely used in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. It is necessary to collect data on the long-term safety and efficacy of the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, analyze its long-term effectiveness, and provide guidance for clinical practice.
DTFI is a single-center, prospective cohort study aimed at evaluating the hemodynamics of in-stent stenosis after flow diverter implantation, seeking to identify the threshold effect of blood flow in stenosis.
This study aims to collect clinical, laboratory, and imaging data from patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms, and collect blood or urine samples for cotinine testing. The enrolled patients underwent Pipeline implantation. The purpose is to study the effect after Pipelineline implantation.
The prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) in the population is about 2%-7%, and once it ruptures and bleeds, the rate of disability and death is extremely high, with 10%-15% of patients dying suddenly before they can seek medical attention, 35% of first-time bleeders, and 60%-80% of second-time bleeders. Survivors are often disabled. Therefore, there is a broad consensus that UIA with surgical indication should be aggressively intervened. The efficacy and safety of flow diverter (FD) in the treatment of UIA has been confirmed by many large clinical trials. Currently, FD placement for UIA is performed under general anesthesia (GA) in most centers, however, some studies have observed that FD placement under local anesthesia (LA) is not as effective as FD placement under general anesthesia and have demonstrated the feasibility of FD placement under local anesthesia (LA) with high technical success rates and low perioperative complication rates and mortality. However, the retrospective design and relatively limited sample size of the above studies may introduce significant bias and affect the confidence of the conclusions. Therefore, the present trial was designed as a randomized controlled trial with the aim of comparing the safety and efficacy of GA and LA in UIA patients undergoing FD placement. The results of this study will help inform future multicenter trials to validate the impact of anesthesia choice on the safety and efficacy in UIA patients undergoing FD placement.
Most intracranial aneurysms are found accidentally in neurovascular imaging. And these inspection methods are limited by the problems of instrument fixation, radiation, time-consuming, contrast agent toxicity and so on. At present, blood test is an ideal alternative method for early diagnosis. Compared with imaging examination, it is economical, general screening and convenient. Blood test is simple to operate, easy to be accepted by patients, and less invasive. Early screening of aneurysms can be performed.
The Jacobs Institute is participating in a study designed to collect prospective clinical evidence to evaluate the approved use of the Pipeline™ Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology™ for the endovascular treatment of adults (22 years of age or older) with wide-necked intracranial aneurysms
Prospective, post-registration, interventional, randomized, in parallel groups, multicenter Eurasian clinical study of DERIVO®/DERIVO® mini Aneurysm Embolization Device, Europe-Asia