View clinical trials related to Intestinal Diseases.
Filter by:Emerging research suggests that physical activity may improve health-related quality of life (HrQoL) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and positively influence physical symptoms, fatigue, stress and anxiety. However, little is known about detailed movement patterns and their specific health effects in IBD patients or about patients' wishes, motivation and preferences for physical activity in their everyday lives. Based on exisiting evidence, the investigators' hypothesis is that an individually tailored, behavioural intervention focusing on reducing sedentary behaviour and increasing daily physical activity is feasible and effective in patients with IBD. Therefore, the overall aim of this randomized feasibility study is to determine the feasibility of the behavioural intervention, including the testing of recruitment procedures, intervention adherence, retention and outcome assessments. Intervention participants will undergo: 1. A group session with information about IBD and the effects and recommendations of physical activity and exercise 2. Four motivational interviews with a project nurse, including goal-setting and action plans 3. An optional part, where each participant will have the possibility of choosing between: - An one-hour individual session with a physiotherapist - Being teamed up with 1-2 'exercise buddies' (other intervention participants) and/or - Access to four short 2-3 minutes videos/'reels' of a physiotherapist explaining and demonstrating beneficial physical exercises Results from the present feasibility study will determine if and how to proceed with a large-scale randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of the intervention.
A 'digital-first' approach is currently under implementation in several Swedish regions. The principles behind implementing an online service as an access way to primary care are based on an expectation that it can make access easier, direct people to appropriate levels of care, and increase both availability of heath care and cost efficiency. However, a recent Swedish report concluded that digital triage in primary care has not been investigated in a clinical real-world setting, including real patients, meaning that the benefits and risks for patients as well as on a system level remain unclear. The aim of this trial is to study the feasibility of a larger trial that will compare digital triage and traditional telephone triage on adherence to triaged health care level, in a randomized controlled study (feasibility study, RCT). The study will recruit a total of 120 patients, of which half will be randomized to telephone triage and half to digital triage.
UCon is a medical device for treatment of the symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB) and bowel dysfunction (BD). It electrically stimulates the DGN through the skin to obtain modulated behaviour of the bladder/bowel musculature e.g., suppress undesired bladder/bowel activity to relieve the symptoms of the patient. This clinical investigation is designed as a single-arm, prospective, multi-centre, and early feasibility study.
The investigators are testing the effect of electrical stimulation of the rectum on colonic motility. Most individuals with spinal cord injury develop neurogenic bowel dysfunction, which includes slowed colonic motility, which means that stools take longer than normal to pass through the colon. This slowed movement may result in chronic constipation and difficulty emptying the bowels. Individuals typically (without or without caregiver assistance) insert a gloved finger into the rectum and gently stretch it to improve colonic motility for a brief period to empty the bowels. The investigators hypothesize that electrically stimulating the rectum, instead of mechanically stretching it, will produce the same beneficial effect of improving colonic motility. Therefore, this study will compare the two methods. If electrical stimulation effectively improves colonic motility, then the investigator shall develop the approach as a therapeutic intervention in future studies.
Bowel urgency is commonly defined as the sudden need to rush to the bathroom to empty one's bowel. In the field of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC)), bowel urgency is part of the top five research priorities for future IBD nursing research, and it is a symptom that patients consider to be most important when prioritizing their disease control. Urgency is a patient-reported outcome associated with compromised quality of life and future risk of hospitalizations, corticosteroids, and colectomy in patients with UC. A meta-analysis of 321 studies examining bowel urgency revealed that only one-third of these clinical studies clearly defined the concept of bowel urgency. Definition of bowel urgency was heterogeneous as 14 different definitions were identified. In most of these studies, non-validated questionnaires were used. They are based on subjective responses of the patients, and they could determine evaluation bias. These data emphasize the lack of standardization in bowel urgency assessment.
Objective: To use clinical, genetic and genome analysis to better understand and define the genetic and environmental factors that contribute to IBD in diverse ancestries: African, African American, Black, Afro-Caribbean, Afro-Latino/a/x, Latino/a/x, Hispanic, or any other Black or Latin or indigenous ancestry.
Anti tumor necrosis factor (TNF agents), particularly infliximab and adalimumab, changed the way chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) refractory to conventional therapies is treated, including in pediatric patients. However, approximately 10-30% of patients do not respond to initial therapy and up to 50% lose response over time. Variability in response to therapy may be influenced by multiple interacting factors at different levels. Recent studies showed that measurement of serum infliximab concentrations during induction therapy predicts treatment effects at one year. Therefore, therapeutic monitoring of infliximab is proposed as a useful strategy to improve clinical outcomes and optimize healthcare resources. Most commercially available methods for infliximab quantification are based on the ELISA assay, which has an assay time of at least 8 hours. Recently, commercial point-of-care devices became available with assay times of less than one hour, enabling real-time therapeutic drug monitoring; however, validation of these devices in clinical settings and comparison with standard assays are still needed, particularly in pediatric patients. In addition, some studies suggest that loss of response in patients treated with anti-TNFs may be partly due to the emergence of specific anti-drug antibodies (AAFs). A limitation of the most widely used ELISA assays is the inability to quantify drug and AAF when they are simultaneously present. Recently, innovative ELISA assays have become available to overcome this problem. However, there is a lack of comparative studies between the classical and the specific method in terms of clinical response in pediatric patients. In patients who do not respond to infliximab, especially if they have high levels of AAF, guidelines call for the use of adalimumab. For this drug, the evidence in the literature regarding therapeutic monitoring of adalimumab concentrations and association with response in pediatric patients is still very preliminary. This study, carried out in in pediatric patients with IBD, aims to: 1. validate the "point of care" infliximab assay by comparing it with reference ELISA assays; 2. evaluate the correlation of infliximab and AAF levels, as measured by the innovative ELISA assays, with response to therapy, compared to traditional assays. 3. evaluate the association between adalimumab and AAF levels and response to therapy
M-TECCU is a study: multicenter, randomized and open. It consists of two parallel groups to compare the efficacy of the TECCU web-based telemonitoring system to achieve and maintain activity remission in patients with moderate-high complexity inflammatory bowel disease compared to usual clinical practice.
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) includes a group of chronic inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal system and is composed of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. As an immune-mediated disease, IBD treatment options include the use of biologic medicines including anti-tumor necrosis alpha factor (also called anti-TNFs) medication. Despite biologic medicines being an important part of IBD management, there is inconsistency in the way these medications are used. Implementation of evidence-based, standardized biologic care pathways (BCP) can improve treatment related outcomes. Previous research has shown that using a clinical care pathway, such as a BCP, is a feasible method to support clinical decision making and may improve disease-related outcomes for patients. The researchers propose a prospective study to determine how well a BCP can be incorporated into clinical practice, improve patient health outcomes, and reduce healthcare system redundancies. Also, the impact of a BCP on outcomes for patients treated with the help of a standardized BCP compared to those in patients treated without the use of a BCP will be studied. The results of this study will inform how best to incorporate evidence-based BCPs into real-world practice and support the wide-spread adoption of BCPs in clinical practice.
Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a progressive disease of the biliary tree, which represents one of the most frequent indications for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx) in developed countries. There are several lines of evidence that dietary gluten/gliadin displays chronic pro-inflammatory, LPS-like properties. Recent evidence demonstrated the protective effect of gluten- free diet (GFD) in autoimmune diseases like type 1 diabetes, irritable bowel syndrome, non-celiac gluten sensitivity and some neurological disorders. This study is intended to explore therapeutic effect of GFD on PSC and IBD in prospective self-controlled mono-centric intervention study. Hypothesis: Avoidance of gluten in diet will reduce progression, symptoms and intestinal inflammation in PSC and UC patients.