Intestinal Behcet Disease Clinical Trial
Official title:
Ntestinal Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Enterography, and Conventional Assessment Tools Before and After Medical Treatment of Intestinal Behcet's Disease: Prospective Observational Study
Background: The "treat-to-target" approach has recently been adopted in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The basic premise is to define specific measurable targets and then adjust treatment until these targets are achieved and maintained. According to the Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE)-Ⅱ statement published in 2021, the long-term treatment targets for IBD are clinical remission, endoscopic healing, absence of disability, restoration of quality of life, and normal growth in children. Symptomatic relief and normalization of serum and fecal markers were determined as short-term targets. Transmural healing in Crohn's disease and histological healing in ulcerative colitis are not formal targets but should be assessed as measures of the remission depth. While endoscopic examination assesses the mucosal inflammatory status of the bowel wall, transmural inflammatory status needs to be evaluated with ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance enterography (MRE). Ultrasound is advantageous as it does not utilize ionizing radiation and is less costly and uncomfortable for patients, allowing more frequent use. Recent studies suggest that intestinal ultrasound is beneficial in treatment response assessment and planning in patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. However, there is a paucity of study regarding the effectiveness of intestinal ultrasound in management of intestinal Behcet's disease. Furthermore, despite its accuracy and comprehensive imaging capabilities without radiation risk, MRE has not been widely used in the diagnosis and follow-up of the patients with intestinal Behcet's disease, and no studies have reported changes in MRE findings after treatment.
Design: Prospective, single-center, cohort, observational study. Methods: The patients with intestinal Behcet's disease who have detectable bowel wall abnormality on baseline ileocolonoscopic examination, CT or MRE, and ultrasound are enrolled before starting the medical treatment. Before and until 26 weeks after the treatment, Disease Activity Index for Intestinal Behcet's disease, intestinal ultrasound, ileocolonoscopic examination, MRE, serum C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin examinations are done. Purpose: To investigate the accuracies of intestinal ultrasound in identifying endoscopic and clinical remissions. Additionally, to investigate the accuracies of MRE in identifying endoscopic and clinical remissions and responses. Further assessment may include cross-sectional correlation analysis between the different examination results and regression analysis to assess whether baseline examination results can predict the long-term clinical outcomes. Sample size: 55 patients. The primary outcome of this study, the diagnostic accuracy of intestinal ultrasound in identifying endoscopic remission, has not been previous studied or reported in patients with intestinal Behcet's disease. Therefore, the investigators adopted the prospective study results published in Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Open in 2020 which reported the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of intestinal ultrasound in diagnosing endoscopically active disease in Crohn disease (Sathananthan D et al. JGH Open. 2020;4(2):273-9). In that study, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 91%, 83%, 91%, and 83%, respectively, in 17 patients with Crohn's disease. In the data, the accuracy must have been either 82% (14/17) or 88% (15/17). Therefore, the investigators expect the accuracy in this study to be approximately 85%. Using confidence intervals for one proportion with Score (Wilson) formula, the sample size was calculated to achieve a 95% confidence interval width of 20% for the primary outcome. This calculation resulted in a sample size of 49. Considering an expected dropout rate of 10%, the investigators aim to include a total number of 55 patients. ;