View clinical trials related to Injection Site Discomfort.
Filter by:This is an open-label, single-center, randomized, split-face, controlled study to assess the effect of comfort intervention on pain during treatment injection compared against non-comfort intervention.
The goal of this single-blinded randomized controlled trial is to compare pain perception during buccal infiltration using indirect EC spray and topical anesthesia and BC 20% topical gel, among seven to 10-year-old school children who attended Pediatric Dentistry Department at Dubai Dental Hospital (DDH), Mohammed Bin Rashid University (MBRU) in Dubai, the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The main question[s] it aims to answer are: • How effective is the indirect application of EC topical spray anesthesia on pain perception during intraoral buccal injection in children in comparsion to BC 20%? Researchers will compare efficacy of 20% Benzocaine (BC) gel and indirect application of Ethyl Chloride (EC) spray to see if reducing pain perception during local anesthesia infiltration.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about the effects of vapocoolant spray applied during intraarticular knee injections on pain and anxiety compared to injections without any agent application in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The main questions it aims to answer are: • Contrary to popular belief, does coolant spray application really reduce pain? • Does it have an advantage over patients with placebo or no spray at all? After intraarticular knee hyaluronic acid application, patients will be asked to indicate injection-related pain and anxiety levels on a 100mm visual analog scale. Researchers will compare the patient groups who were applied coolant spray, placebo spray and injection without any spray.
This is a randomized, double-blind, single-center clinical trial comparing normal saline and bacteriostatic saline subcutaneous injection within a single subject. While both normal saline and bacteriostatic saline can be administered intravenously, this study aims to investigate their effects following subcutaneous injection. While benzyl alcohol (the bacteriostatic component of bacteriostatic saline) is known to have local anesthetic properties, it also is an irritant and can cause inflammation at the injection site. Based on clinical experience investigators anticipate that a normal saline injection will cause a mild stinging sensation and no subsequent inflammation. In contrast, subcutaneous injection of bacteriostatic saline will not cause stinging but will cause a mild degree of inflammation which is manifested as mild tenderness and mild ecchymosis at the site of injection.
The aim of this study was the determination of the effect of applying VR and DC distraction methods on patients' pain and satisfaction levels during IM benzathine penicillin injection. The research hypothesis: 1. Are Virtual Reality and Distraction Card effective in reducing pain due to injection of IM benzathine penicillin? 2. Does the use of Virtual Reality and Distraction Card during the injection process of IM benzathine penicillin have an effect on patient satisfaction?
The purpose of this study is to determine whether certain intravitreal injection techniques cause less pain than others and would therefore be beneficial for the patient's well being.
The investigators want to investigate whether specific immunotherapy can be delivered directly into a lymph node. The investigators think that a direct introduction of allergen to the antigen presenting cells in the lymph node a give a strong immune response and that this can change the number of injections needed in allergen immunotherapy. The investigators do measurements of clinical effect and a variety of paraclinical test to see if the investigators can find af biomarker of successful specific immune therapy of grass allergy.