Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03370068
Other study ID # SHEBA-17-4531-TEM-CTIL
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 1, 2018
Est. completion date July 1, 2020

Study information

Verified date July 2020
Source Sheba Medical Center
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The use of Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has increased in the last decades regardless of the cause of infertility. Despite the increased use there is no clear evidence that ICIS is more effective than conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) for non-male factor infertility. The investigators therefore aim to perform a prospective randomized controlled study to compare between ICSI and conventional IVF in women between 39 to 44 years of age with non-male factor infertility.


Description:

ICSI is a method used in IVF in which a single sperm is injected directly into an oocyte. Originally ICSI was developed as a method for the treatment for couples with severe male factor infertility. In the last decades the use of ICSI has increased dramatically, especially for non-male factor infertility. In certain fertility clinics in the world ICSI is conducted in 100% of IVF cycles.

Despite the increased use of ICSI, there is no clear evidence that ICIS is more effective than conventional IVF for non-male factor infertility. There are currently few randomized controlled studies that compared the two modalities in the case of non-male factor infertility. In a randomized controlled trial that included 415 couples with non-male factor infertility and women younger than 37 years of age, conventional IVF was associated with better fertilization and implantation rates than ICSI but with comparable live birth rates. In addition, studies have not shown an advantage for ICSI over conventional IVF in the case of unexplained infertility, low oocyte yield or routine use to decrease the incidence of fertilization failure.

The proportion of women after the age of 35 undergoing IVF is constantly on the rise. Oocytes retrieved from older women are often of lower quality then oocytes retrieved from younger women. It is believed that due to the lower quality the fertilization rate is decreased in this population. However a recently published retrospective study including 745 women did not show an advantage for ICSI over conventional IVF. Contrary to what is believed, the conventional IVF group had a higher number of zygotes formed, more cycles with embryos transferred at the blastocyst stage and more cycles where embryos were available for cryopreservation.

The investigators therefore aim to perform a prospective randomized controlled study to compare between ICSI and conventional IVF in women between 39 to 44 years of age with non-male factor infertility. Male-factor infertility will be diagnosed according to the accepted semen analysis values included a semen concentration of 200 million/mL, progressive motility of 40% and a strict morphology of 4%. Patients will undergo standard clinical and hormonal investigation as usual for IVF. The treatment protocol will be in accordance with the decision of the attending physician, regardless of the research. Randomization will be between the ovaries of each patient. Following an informed consent a computer based randomization will allocate either ICSI or conventional IVF for each ovary so that for each study participant oocyte from one ovary will be randomly allocated to insemination by ICSI and the oocytes from the other ovary will be allocated to insemination by conventional IVF. As is customary in our IVF unit, 24, 72 and 96 hours after oocyte retrieval, the embryos will by studied by an embryologist for the number of cells and embryo quality.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 69
Est. completion date July 1, 2020
Est. primary completion date July 1, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender Female
Age group 39 Years to 44 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Women between 39 to 44 years of age undergoing IVF treatments for non-male factor infertility.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Women undergoing IVF treatments for male factor infertility.

- Cases where PGD is planned.

- Women with a BMI above 40.

- Women younger then 39 years of age or older then 44 years of age.

- Women with a rate of fertilization bellow 50% in previous IVF cycles.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
ICSI
Oocytes retrieved from one ovary will undergo insemination by ICSI.
Conventional IVF
Oocytes retrieved from the second ovary will undergo insemination by conventional IVF

Locations

Country Name City State
Israel IVF Unit, Sheba medical Center Tel HaShomer

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Dr. Tal Miller-Elkan

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Israel, 

References & Publications (8)

Bhattacharya S, Hamilton MP, Shaaban M, Khalaf Y, Seddler M, Ghobara T, Braude P, Kennedy R, Rutherford A, Hartshorne G, Templeton A. Conventional in-vitro fertilisation versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of non-male-factor infertility: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001 Jun 30;357(9274):2075-9. — View Citation

Boulet SL, Mehta A, Kissin DM, Warner L, Kawwass JF, Jamieson DJ. Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. JAMA. 2015 Jan 20;313(3):255-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17985. — View Citation

Check JH, Yuan W, Garberi-Levito MC, Swenson K, McMonagle K. Effect of method of oocyte fertilization on fertilization, pregnancy and implantation rates in women with unexplained infertility. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(3):203-5. — View Citation

Fishel S, Aslam I, Lisi F, Rinaldi L, Timson J, Jacobson M, Gobetz L, Green S, Campbell A, Lisi R. Should ICSI be the treatment of choice for all cases of in-vitro conception? Hum Reprod. 2000 Jun;15(6):1278-83. — View Citation

Korkmaz C, Tekin YB, Sakinci M, Ercan CM. Effects of maternal ageing on ICSI outcomes and embryo development in relation to oocytes morphological characteristics of birefringent structures. Zygote. 2015 Aug;23(4):550-5. doi: 10.1017/S0967199414000197. Epub 2014 May 29. — View Citation

Luna M, Bigelow C, Duke M, Ruman J, Sandler B, Grunfeld L, Copperman AB. Should ICSI be recommended routinely in patients with four or fewer oocytes retrieved? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011 Sep;28(10):911-5. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9614-9. Epub 2011 Jul 27. — View Citation

Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992 Jul 4;340(8810):17-8. — View Citation

Tannus S, Son WY, Gilman A, Younes G, Shavit T, Dahan MH. The role of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-male factor infertility in advanced maternal age. Hum Reprod. 2017 Jan;32(1):119-124. Epub 2016 Nov 16. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Fertilization rate The rate of fertilized oocytes 1 day
Secondary Embryos Number of embryos day 2/3 3-4 day
Secondary Top quality embryos Number of top quality embryos day 2/3. Embryos will be defined as top quality if they will have four cells on Day 2 and/or 7 or 8 cells on Day 3, contain <20% fragmentation, and exhibited no apparent morphological abnormalities. 3-4 days
Secondary Pregnancy Pregnancy is defined as positive ßhCG blood test 11-14 days after embryo transfer. Approximately 2 weeks
Secondary Clinical pregnancy Clinical pregnancy is defined as gestational sac seen on vaginal ultrasound scan by 6 weeks gestation. Approximately 6 weeks
Secondary Pregnancy above 8 weeks gestation Pregnancy above 8 weeks gestation with the appreance of a fetal pulse Approximately 8 weeks
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05969574 - Is Decreased Ovarian Reserve Related to an Increased Number of Previous Early Miscarriages?
Recruiting NCT05358483 - PROspective Study of Mothers' and Infants' Social and Epidemiologic Determinants of Health
Recruiting NCT05969795 - Comparison of Live Birth Rate in Natural Cycle Single Euploid FET Versus Without Luteal Phase Support Phase 1
Recruiting NCT06051201 - Innovation for Small-scale Experiments: ReceptIVFity Test N/A
Completed NCT03177538 - Corifollitropin Alfa Combined With Menotropin Versus Follitropin and Lutropin Alfa in Expected Suboptimal Responders Phase 4
Completed NCT03638856 - Comparing Effectiveness of Oral Misoprostal for Cervical Priming in Hysteroscopy N/A
Completed NCT04052464 - The Study of the Implantation Window From Endometrial Biopsy With Gene Expression Methods
Withdrawn NCT04753736 - Immunophenotypage of RIF and RM Patients and Intrauterine Administration of PBMC N/A
Completed NCT03349905 - Deferred Versus Fresh Embryo Transfers N/A
Completed NCT05076981 - Progesterone Levels During Ovulation and Luteal Phase
Completed NCT04096027 - Cabergoline Before or After Oocyte Collection for Follicular Resolution Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05980091 - Optimal Timing of Euploid Day 6 Blastocyst Transfer in Frozen HRT Cycles, Day 6 or Day 7 of Progesterone Administration. Phase 1
Terminated NCT01933633 - Improved Fertility After Exercise in Overweight/Obese Women N/A
Terminated NCT01202643 - Effect of Colony Stimulating Factor on Poor Endometrial Development During IVF Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT01202656 - Effect of Colony Stimulating Factor on Implantation and Pregnancy Rates Following IVF (in Vitro Fertilization) Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT01408615 - A Post Marketing Observational Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Elonva (Corifollitropin Alfa) in General Practice (P08165)
Enrolling by invitation NCT05698550 - The Role of Erzhi Tiangui Formula in Expected POR Women Undergoing IVF-ET Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT03910582 - Personalized FET in RIF Patients With Displaced Dating N/A
Completed NCT05440019 - Evaluation of the Safety and Usability of the M3T Fertigo System and Its Calibration
Completed NCT05130125 - Retrospective Cohort Observational Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Fresh or Frozen Embryo Transfer