View clinical trials related to Inferior Vena Cava Abnormality.
Filter by:Fluid expansion in critically ill patients following high risk surgery may induce fluid overload and worse outcome. Several tools have been developped to predict fluid responsiveness in such situation in order to avoid inappropriate fluid administration but with several limitations. Inferior vena cava (IVC) distensibility is one of those tools which has the advantage to be non-invasive, dynamic and safe, is usually measured by subcostal (SC)approach. In post surgical setting this acess is limited du to practical reasons (scar, dressing...), therefore a transhepatic (TH) approach is used but has not been validated as a fluid responsiveness prediction tool. The correlation between SC approach with the TH approach vary according to studies. Therefore the performances, the threshold identified for SC approach can not be translated to the TH approach. Further, fluid congestion status measured before IVC analyses, may be a useful confounder and safety endpoint for fluid responsiveness interpretation. The primary objective of this study is therefore to study the performance of the IVC measured using TH approach (IVCth) in predicting of fluid responsiveness defined as an increased of 10% and over of stroke volume. Secondary objectives intend to analyse the correlation between TH and SC approaches, to compared their performances for fluid responsiveness prediction, and to analyse the weight of venous congestion on fluid responsiveness prediction.
Currently, in order to visualize the inferior vena cava (IVC) of the heart using ultrasound, physicians traditionally place the ultrasound probe onto the "Subcostal" area which is located below the chest in the upper abdomen area. In this location, the pressure from the ultrasound probe is often uncomfortable for adults, and even more so for pediatric patients. Previous research and physician experience have demonstrated that it is possible to visualize the heart in the "transhepatic" area which is located under the arm on the side of the chest. By placing the ultrasound probe in this location, it is more comfortable for the patient when applying pressure, and this study aims to prove the effectiveness of visualizing the heart through this new location.
Study Protocol: Outcome Measurements Primary Outcome The main outcome will be the preoperative performance of the dIVCmax/IVCCI ratio to foresee the incidence of hypotension after spinal anesthesia in a greater extent to that of the established IVCCI measurements. Secondary Outcomes To identify other echocardiographic or clinical measurements that can predict an intraoperative spinal-induced haemodynamic instability. Sample Size Calculation A pilot study of 20 patients revealed a detected area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0,91 for dIVCmax/IVCCI and for dIVCmax 0,82 with rank correlation between the two assays being 0.87 in both positive and negative cases. Based on this result, a sample of 56 patients will achieve 80% power to detect significant difference (at a level 0.05) between dIVCmax/IVCCI and dIVCmax. Potential Benefits of the Study The results of this study will allow us to determine which clinical or US-measurement can yield better performance so as a preoperative prediction of spinal-induced hypotension can be achieved; that way these measurements can permit and guide a targeted preoperative fluid challenges prior to the implementation of spinal anesthesia Potential Side Effects of the Study Participation in this protocol will not put patients at higher risk for complications since we do not perform any intervention (either pharmacological or surgical) There will be no occupational risks to researchers or assistants. Proposed Timetable According to the exclusion criteria and taking into account the number of cases performed in our department per monthly basis, it should take us approximately 6 months to recruit 60 patients.