View clinical trials related to Infection Viral.
Filter by:The purpose of the pivotal study is to collect blood specimens and clinical data from pediatric (>90 days old) and adult (≥18 years old) patients presenting with signs and symptoms suggestive of acute bacterial or viral infection. These samples will be used to establish the diagnostic performance of MeMed BV™ for differentiating bacterial from viral infection using method comparison and/or method concordance.
The aim of the present study is to determine if a regular oral supplementation of xanthohumol attenuate the severity of symptoms and duration of´viral infections.
Objectives: 1. To compare the immune response of patients with or without sepsis presenting to the ED with a(n) (suspected) infection. 2. To determine immune response aberrations that are associated with an increased risk of developing sepsis in patients presenting to the ED with a(n) (suspected) infection without sepsis. 3. To determine the long term cognitive and physical sequelae of sepsis after admission.
The goal of this prospective, interventional, single-center study is to assess whether the early detection of Influenza with smartwatch algorithms and alerting, rapid testing, and subsequent Baloxavir treatment demonstrate better post-infection outcomes versus publicly available- and Centers for Disease Control (CDC)-derived national statistics for equivalent household populations as well as pediatric kidney, heart, liver, lung transplant recipients and waitlisted patients.
Vapendavir (VPV) is a drug being developed to treat human rhinovirus (RV) infection, one virus responsible for the common cold. Vapendavir prevents the virus from entering cells and making more infectious copies of itself. A study is being planned to investigate VPV in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung disease making it difficult to breathe) who develop a rhinoviral infection; however, VPV has not been approved for use in treating any indication (disease) by the FDA or any other global regulatory agency. Therefore, VPV is considered investigational, and the study doctor is conducting this investigational research study. Safety will be monitored throughout the entire study.
This Phase 1, randomized, observer-blind, dose-ranging clinical study is evaluating 6 different formulations of MF59-adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted H2N3 influenza vaccine. Approximately 600 healthy adult subjects are to be randomized into 1 of 6 possible treatment groups with 100 subjects per group, stratified by age group (born after or before 1968). Each subject will receive an influenza vaccine injection on Day 1 and Day 22. Subjects will be followed up for approximately 12 months after the second vaccine injection. The primary immunogenicity analysis is based on the Day 1, Day 8, Day 22, Day 29, and Day 43 serology data. The primary safety analysis is based on solicited local and systemic adverse events (AEs) reported within 10 days after each vaccination, unsolicited AEs reported within 3 weeks after each vaccination, and serious AEs (SAEs), medically attended AEs (MAAEs), AEs leading to withdrawal from the study, and AEs of special interest (AESIs) reported throughout the study.
This Phase 2, randomized, observer-blind clinical study is evaluating 3 different priming and booster regimens with MF59-adjuvanted H5N8 and/or H5N6 cell culture-derived influenza vaccine (aH5N8c; aH5N6c). Approximately 480 healthy adult subjects are to be randomized into 1 of 3 possible treatment groups, stratified by age group (18-64 years and ≥65 years) and by poultry worker status (yes/no). Each subject will receive a priming influenza vaccine injection on Day 1 and Day 22 and a booster vaccination on Day 202. Subjects will be followed up for approximately 6 months after the booster injection. The primary immunogenicity analysis is based on antibody responses against H5N8 and H5N6 as measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay on Day 1, Day 22, Day 29, Day 43, Day 202, Day 209 (H5N8 only), and Day 223.
Hospital-Acquired Influenza (HAI) is closely linked to the intensity of influenza in the community. HAI is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and extra costs due to prolonged hospital stay. The incidence of laboratory confirmed HAI has been reported rarely. The proportion of HAI among influenza cases was 11.38% (95% Confidence Interval: 5.19%-19.55%) in a meta-analysis of 14 studies. In France, a prospective surveillance study of adults with Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) over 11 years, reported that 35.6% of the influenza cases diagnosed at hospital were hospital-acquired. HAI is transmitted via respiratory droplets and by hand contacts. The spread is facilitated by Health Care Professionals (HCPs), patients and visitors. Prevention and control of HAI is of upmost importance to preserve patient safety and limit the related economic costs. While vaccination of HCPs has been shown to contribute to the reduction of HAI, less is known on the impact of patient vaccination on the risk of HAI during hospitalization. The aim of this study is to describe the hospital-acquired influenza in a french university hospital.
The clinical trial studies the human pathogen of SARS-CoV-2, with a specificity in the circulating Spike 2 protein in the human system. The clinical trial hypothesizes that SARS-CoV-2 human pathogen arises from immune attacks, underlying the severe physiological symptoms that can be lethal. It further hypothesizes that the vaccines do not deal with the Spike 2 protein that causes the immune attacks.
Background: CT has been used on a massive scale to help identify and investigate suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19 pneumonia. This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of the chest findings MSCT of Covid-19 patients and to determine if prognosis can rely on the initial CT imaging. Methods: The study design was retrospective cohort study. It was carried out on 300 patients presented to the chest outpatient clinics in Benha university hospitals and Elabbasyia chest hospital with clinical picture suggestive of COVID 19 infection. The CT finding were then compared to the short-term clinical outcome of the patients (1-3weeks), acquired from the hospital patient data archive. According to the progression of the respiratory symptoms (include; dyspnea, respiratory rate and O2 saturation), the short-term clinical outcome of the patients was classified into 4 groups; Group A: (mild cases), Group B: (moderate cases), Group C: (sever cases), and Group D: (fatality cases).