View clinical trials related to Infection Control.
Filter by:Environmental hygiene is a key component of infection prevention in healthcare, and a driver of healthcare associated infections. Staff who clean in many low resource countries receive no formal training on cleaning, waste disposal and linen handling. This issue has been execrated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The only recommended training on environmental hygiene for low resourced facilities, TEACH CLEAN, uses a training of trainers model. A selected cadre "champions" which in turn train their peers with responsibilities on environmental hygiene at the facility level. Early pilot data to test its effectiveness of this training package are very promising. The main objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of an environmental cleaning bundle to improve microbiological cleanliness in Cambodian hospitals. The latest TEACH CLEAN will be implemented across all hospitals (13) of three provinces in Cambodia. A stepped wedge randomised trial will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of TEACH CLEAN to improve microbiological cleanliness in Cambodian hospitals. All facilities will receive the intervention. Hospitals are arranged in groups of three or four based on the randomisation with staggered commencement dates of the intervention at four distinct time points. The design will include ten months of data collection. We expect one month gap between the training of champions and the training of staff at the facility level. The main outcome is microbiological cleanliness (<2.5 cfu/cm2 = clean ; ≥2.5 cfu/cm2 = not clean) measured using a non-specific agar on one side for measuring total Aerobic Colony Counts (ACC/cm2). With 30 sampling sites in each hospital and with a pre-training cleanliness proportion ranging from 30% to 50% will give us over 85% power to detect a 10% absolute post-intervention increase in cleanliness. Evidence from this trial will contribute to future policy and practice guidelines about hospital environmental hygiene and ultimately reduce healthcare associated infections. This would be the first randomised trial on environmental hygiene in low resource settings.
Whether university teaching on campus with infection control measures in place is associated with higher risk of COVID-19 than online instruction, is unknown. The investigators will assess this by conducting repeated surveys among students at universities and university colleges in Norway, where some instruction is given in-person, and some is provided online (hybrid model). The investigators will ask about the students' COVID-19 status, and how much in-person and online instruction the students are getting. The investigators will estimate the association between in-person instruction and COVID-19-risk using multivariate regression, controlling for likely confounders. The investigators will also assess whether type of instruction is associated with how satisfied the students are with the instruction the students are offered, their quality of life, and learning outcomes.
Effective cleaning of surfaces in the hospital environment is an absolute necessity to reduce pathogen transmission. Multi Drug Resistant Organisms (MDRO) in ICU are among the leading causes of hospital-acquired infections. Today, the growing prevalence of MDRO has made it more important than ever to clean contaminated surfaces with appropriate aseptic cleaning procedures, to protect patients and personnel. Despite the disinfection and sterilization methods, microorganisms that reach a sufficient concentration in the hospital environment survive for long periods and can cause serious transmission via contaminated hands of healthcare workers. In this context, surface cleaning and disinfection procedures in the hospital environment reduce cross-contamination of the health care units and disease-causing pathogens. Recently, environmental cleaning and disinfection have become important as well as the evaluation of cleanliness. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and usability of BCA method, which is a new approach in evaluating the effectiveness of environmental cleanliness in intensive care units. fluoroscan gel marking, microbiological sampling and BCA assay methods will be compared to evaluate the effectiveness and usability of the BCA method. (PRO1 Micro Hygiene Monitoring System that System consisting of protein pen and device that analyzes with BCA method).
The overall aim of the study is to investigate whether routine administration of antibiotic prophylaxis 1 hour prior to implant surgery may prevent postoperative infection and implant loss in healthy or substantially healthy patients (ASA Class 1 and Class 2).
The purpose of this quality improvement study is to measure the effectiveness of surveillance using optimized statistical process control (SPC) methods and feedback on rates of surgical site infection (SSI) compared to traditional surveillance and feedback. The primary objective is to determine if hospital clusters randomized to receive feedback from optimized SPC surveillance methods collectively have lower rates of SSI compared to hospital clusters randomized to receiving feedback from traditional surveillance methods. Secondary objectives are 1) to estimate and compare the number of signals identified using optimized SPC methods and traditional surveillance methods; 2) to estimate and compare the time and effort required to investigate signals generated using optimized SPC methods and traditional surveillance methods; and 3) to estimate the number and proportion of false-positive signals identified using optimized SPC methods and traditional surveillance methods. The Early 2RIS study will be a prospective, multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial using stepped wedge design. The active component of the quality improvement study will be performed in 29 DICON hospitals over three years, from March 2017 through February 2020. Clusters randomized to intervention will receive feedback on increasing rates of SSI identified through optimized SPC methods. This intervention is expected to decrease the subsequent rate of SSIs by closing the feedback loop on SSI outcomes. Participating study hospitals will all be members of DICON, a network of 43 community hospitals in North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, and Virginia that provides community hospitals access to consultative services from infection prevention experts, data analyses and benchmarking, and educational materials designed by faculty from Duke. This study is considered part of routine quality improvement measures and a part of previously established agreements between DICON and the community hospitals. Data flow and communication are outlined in detail in approved protocols determined to be exempt research by the DUHS IRB. Briefly, existing clinical data are extracted from participating hospitals' electronic medical record into discrete files according to DICON specifications. Then a de-identification process removes direct patient identifiers into a limited dataset. The majority of data collection will occur through methods already developed and utilized by study hospitals. In brief, each hospital routinely submits limited datasets to the DICON Surgical Surveillance Database, including the following variables: hospital, type of procedure, patient identifier, date of procedure, age, sex, surgeon identifier, start/stop times, ASA score, wound class, risk index, SSI (Yes/No), date of infection, type of SSI, location at diagnosis and organism. No identifiable patient or surgeon data are transmitted to the DICON Surgical Database. Data definitions and data collection methods are standardized across DICON hospitals. Following signal adjudication, additional data will be collected in a REDCap database to document actions and rationale.
This study evaluates if the implementation of an online platform with procedures and protocols, improve the knowledge of professionals and can have a health impact related to decreased contamination of blood cultures.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether extra cleaning of frequently-contaminated surfaces in intensive care rooms is effective in preventing contamination of disposable isolation gowns and gloves with multi-drug resistant bacteria.