View clinical trials related to Induced; Birth.
Filter by:Induced labour is a medical intervention designed to initiate or accelerate the childbirth process when clinically indicated. Induced labour concerns 25.8% of pregnant women in France, according to the latest National Perinatal Survey 2021. This rate is rising steadily, since in 2016 induction concerned 22% of pregnancies. There are many medical indications for induction, both maternal and foetal. Induced labour in hospitals is beginning to reach its limits, given the reduction in the number of nursing staff and the reduction in the number of beds available. In some cases, patients are hospitalised for 24 to 72 hours before going into labour. In this context, the place where the birth takes place, whether at home or in hospital, is essential, with a potential impact on patient satisfaction and the experience of induction. Cervical ripening can be a difficult experience for women, with a feeling of loss of control at this crucial stage. The duration of induction is one of the factors that women would like to see changed when asked about the aftermath of induction. The option of inducing at home might seem to improve women's experience and reduce the length of their stay in hospital.
The goal of this clinical trial] is to compare the outcomes between induction to labour at home versus hospitalized. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Can the induction to labour at home with cervical rippening ballon increase the vaginal delivery rate? - Will the induction to labour at home increase maternal satisfaction - Will the induction to labour at home improve medical circuits and coulb it be cost effective? Participants who meet inclusion criteria will undergo randomization so as to be asignated an induction to labour at home or in the hospital. Researchers will compare both labour induction groups to see if the induction to labour at home has better outcomes as described previously.
The goal of this randomized control trial is to compare outpatient transcervical foley balloon to inpatient vaginal misoprostol in pregnant women for cervical ripening. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does outpatient transcervical foley balloon decreased the time from admission to delivery compared to inpatient vaginal misoprostol 2. Does outpatient transcervical foley balloon will increase risk of c-section during induction of labor compared to inpatient vaginal misoprostol Participants will be randomized to either the outpatient transcervical foley balloon group or to the inpatient intravaginal misoprostol group. The researchers will compare if outpatient transcervical foley balloon decreases the tie from hospital admission to delivery of the baby.
Over the past years, the rates of labor induction have increased steadily, and at present more than one in four births occurs after induced labor in Norway. There is evidence that several groups of women benefit from labor induction, including those with preeclampsia (1), postdate pregnancy, diabetes, a large-for-gestational-age fetus, gestational diabetes, prelabor rupture of membranes at term, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, twin pregnancy and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. At the same time, induction of labor is an independent risk factor for adverse obstetric outcomes, including cesarean section, operative vaginal delivery, chorioamnionitis, labor dystocia, prolonged labor, uterine rupture, and neonatal pH < 7.10. A recent Norwegian nationwide clinical practice pilot evaluation demonstrated that the rate of intervention was high, and that as many as 44% of women with labor induction experienced operative delivery. Given that induction of labor is a common procedure (15 000 women per year in Norway) and increases risk of several major obstetric complications, interventions that may reduce operative births and facilitate safe deliveries are highly warranted. Bicarbonate and butylscopolamine bromide have been used in smaller studies in order to shorten labor. The medications seem to be safe with a low frequency of adverse events. The rationale of the present study is therefore to assess the efficacy of oral bicarbonate and intravenous butylscopolamine bromide on facilitating spontaneous (non-operative) delivery in pregnant female participants with induction of labor.
This study aims to develop a visual aid tool for induction education informed by the experiences and needs of historically marginalized pregnant women, as well as determine the impact of the patient-informed visual aid on patient knowledge, satisfaction, and trust in physicians regarding induction methods.