View clinical trials related to Incisional Hernia.
Filter by:Purpose Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a risk factor for incisional hernia, COPD has persistent airflow restriction and pulmonary ventilation dysfunction. The aim of this study was to compare differences in pulmonary ventilation function between primary incisional hernia and recurrent incisional hernia. Method According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,Patients diagnosed with "incisional hernia" in our hospital's electronic medical record system were divided into two groups: primary group and recurrent group based on whether the incisional hernia recurred after incisional hernia repair,who were screened out with abdominal wall incisional hernia.The patient information of the two groups were collected, examined and recorded.The clinical data was analyzed by using statistical analysis software.
Purpose of study is to assess perioperative functional parameters of the anterior abdominal wall muscles and postural control status in patients with large and giant incisional hernias in a controlled diagnostic study. The study involved 95 patients (100% completed) with a large or giant incisional hernia of the anterior abdominal wall. The participants were divided into three groups by type of hernia repair: bridged hernia repair, Rives-Stoppa procedure, or TAR technique. Perioperative functional parameters of the anterior abdominal wall muscles were assessed by tension dynamometry. The postural balance assessments were made by raster photostereography.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of using polypropylene mesh for hernia prevention after stoma closure in patients with colorectal cancer and non-mesh repair. The main question it aims to answer is: can mesh help prevent hernia? Participants will be divided into 2 groups: with and without mesh using. They must be followed up for 2 years after enrollment in the study. Researchers will compare mesh and non-mesh groups to evaluate the benefits and harms of mesh using in hernia prevention.
The goal of our work of optimization of the treatment of postoperative hernias is to improve the results of treatment of patients with median and median-lateral postoperative hernias of medium (W2) and large (W3) sizes by developing new surgical techniques. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. To study the topographic and variant anatomy of vessels and nerves in the retromuscular, preperitoneal, postperitoneal and pre-abdominal cell spaces of the anterior abdominal wall. To determine the most probable sources of blood flow and lymph from the anatomical formations forming the bed of the endoprosthesis. 2. To develop technical, surgical techniques that allow to form an implant bed with minimal traumatization of blood vessels and nerves and reduce the risk of postoperative complications. 3. To develop a technique for plasty of the anterior abdominal wall in mid-lateral postoperative hernias with a combination of retromuscular and subaponeurotic spaces. The researchers will compare an experimental group in which a new method of preparing the implant place will be used and a control group in which standard methods of treating postoperative ventral hernias were used to see whether the new method affects the improvement of the postoperative period and the reduction of complications.
The objective of this study is to develop a predictive model of IH based on machine learning with the use of the XGBoost technique, this will help surgeons in charge of abdominal wall closure to have objective support to determine high-risk patients and in them modify the closure technique or use a mesh according to their choice or the degree of contamination of the abdominal cavity.
Nowadays, two intraperitoneal mesh approaches are commonly used in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair (LVHR): the simple intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (sIPOM) and the intraperitoneal onlay mesh reinforcement with defect closure before placement of mesh (pIPOM). The pIPOM has been introduced to reduce adverse events in incisional hernia (IH) surgery (i.e., seroma formation, recurrences etc ) associated to laparoscopic hernia repair, and satisfactory outcomes has been reported in several studies. In details, sequelae such mesh bulging seems to be less associated to pIPOM than sIPOM, even if the latter topic is matter of intense debate. The pIPOM has been introduced in the guidelines for the laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias published by the International Endohernia Society (IEHS) in 2014. Despite prospective studies on the quality of IPOM-Plus are available, the evidence level for the statements in these guidelines remains low. The aim of this prospective analysis is to compare the postoperative outcomes of patients treated for Incisional hernia (IH) with sIPOM and pIPOM after 36 months follow-up in terms of recurrence and wound events.
The goal of this single arm intervention study is to investigate the safety and performance of a suturing device for closure of the midline incision after open abdominal surgery. The study population consists of 38 patients selected for open abdominal procedures for malignant and benign colorectal disease. The main question it aims to answer is: • If the device facilitates a Suture-Length to Wound-Length (SL/WL) ratio of 4:1 Participants laparotomy wound will be closed with the device at the end of the operation and closure related data as closure time and SL/WL ratio will be calculated. The wound will be assessed for infection during the postoperative stay and the chart will be reviewed for wound dehiscence and wound infection.
The aim of this study is to evaluate safety and effectiveness of a hybrid mesh (GORE® SYNECOR Intraperitoneal Biomaterial) in patients with a BMI of 30 kg/m2 or more undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) with intraperitoneal position of the mesh.
The goal of this clinical trial is to explore the safety and effectiveness of stoma reversal combining bio-mesh placement in patients with high risk of stoma site incisional hernia (SSIH). The main questions it aims to answer are: - Whether bio-mesh placement is safe for patients with a high risk of SSIH. - Whether stoma reversal combining bio-mesh placement is a preventive strategy for patients with high risk of SSIH. - Whether stoma reversal combining bio-mesh placement will trigger other complications. Participants who are eligible and are enrolled in this study will receive stoma reversal combining bio-mesh placement surgery. After that, they will be followed up for one year to evaluate the occurrence of SSIH and other complications.
This observational, retrospective study aims to examine surgical outcomes in non-elective surgery for incisional hernia. The main questions it aims to answer are: - 30-day morbidity - short- and long-term surgical outcomes Data will be retrospectively collected from participating centers and compared. Researchers will compare surgical outcomes of the minimally invasive and laparotomic approaches to see if there are relevant differences in surgical outcomes.