View clinical trials related to Implant Site Reaction.
Filter by:this study was to compare the bone height changes around three implant telescopic, locator, and ball retained mandibular overdentures. radiographic changes in peri-implant tissue in three groups were evaluated
Twenty compromised post-extraction sockets were managed by VST and IMP. After tooth extraction and IMP, a vestibular incision was cut and a cortical bone shield was stabilized. The jumping gap was then filled with particulate bone graft, which was protected by a healing abutment. After 2 years labial plate thickness was evaluated at 3 levels (crestal, middle and apical) using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Pink esthetic core (PES), and probing depth (PD) were also measured. 2 year following implant placement, the mean differences (µ) and standard deviations (SD) were calculated. Paired t-test was used for detecting significant results at P≤.05.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the peri-implant crestal bone level around implants placed 1.5 mm subcrestally, with a 1 mm or 3 mm definitive abutment height at the time of implant placement after 1 year. Patients were selected from the Department of Periodontology at Universitat Internacional de Catalunya. X-rays were taken at the time of implant placement, 8-12 weeks after placement, after screwing the provisional rehabilitation and at 12 months. An examiner indicated the crestal marginal bone level, the marginal bone level of the implant, and the marginal bone level of the abutment . The examiner, independent to the study, carried out the radiographic analysis using the Image J software on periapical radiographs.
: Assessment of the neurosensory alteration with computer guided inferior alveolar nerve lateralization versus non guided classic technique and measuring stability of implant after placement
Aim: The aim of this study to Assess the healing process of the immediate implant loading with two different provisional techniques (direct and indirect). Materials and methods: 20 implant in the aesthetic zone either in the incisor or in the canine area and excluding the lateral location and then immediate loading is achieved for the 20 implants (10 for direct and 10 for indirect method) Clinical Aspect :color change , healing and bone resorption Esthetic assessment and patient acceptance will be assessed using specific tools. Lab aspect: surface roughness and Marginal fit will be measured to have clue vision.